The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 49 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting
Open accessAbstract
Implementation strategies have unparalleled importance in implementation science, as they constitute the 'how to' component of changing healthcare practice. Yet, implementation researchers and other stakeholders are not able to fully utilize the findings of studies focusing on implementation strategies because they are often inconsistently labelled and poorly described, are rarely justified theoretically, lack operational definitions or manuals to guide their use, and are part of 'packaged' approaches whose specific elements are poorly understood. We address the challenges of specifying and reporting implementation strategies encountered by researchers who design, conduct, and report research on implementation strategies. Specifically, we propose guidelines for naming, defining, and operationalizing implementation strategies in terms of seven dimensions: actor, the action, action targets, temporality, dose, implementation outcomes addressed, and theoretical justification. Ultimately, implementation strategies cannot be used in practice or tested in research without a full description of their components and how they should be used. As with all intervention research, their descriptions must be precise enough to enable measurement and 'reproducibility.' We propose these recommendations to improve the reporting of implementation strategies in research studies and to stimulate further identification of elements pertinent to implementation strategies that should be included in reporting guidelines for implementation strategies.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper argues that implementation strategies are inconsistently labelled and poorly described, limiting replication, meta-analysis, and practice use. It proposes reporting standards for naming, defining, and operationalizing strategies across seven dimensions: actor, action, action targets, temporality, dose, implementation outcomes addressed, and theoretical justification.
Key findings
- Implementation strategies often lack consistent labels, theoretical justification, operational definitions or manuals, and are part of packaged approaches whose specific elements are poorly understood; this impedes searching, meta-analysis, and replication.
- The authors propose seven dimensions for specification: actor, action, action targets, temporality, dose, implementation outcomes affected, and justification (theoretical, empirical, or pragmatic).
- They recommend two standards: all implementation studies should name and define strategies using existing literature/taxonomies, and specify/operationalize them across the seven dimensions, ideally with manuals or protocols.
- Examples cited include Powell et al.’s menu of 68 implementation strategies grouped by six processes, Michie et al.’s taxonomy of 93 behavior change techniques, Eccles et al.’s five modifiable audit-and-feedback elements producing 288 potential forms, and a review of 61 conceptual models finding 98% addressed more than one of five socioecological levels.
Methods
- Design: conceptual/recommendation paper, not an empirical study; the authors synthesize prior literature and existing reporting guidelines such as WIDER, SQUIRE, and the Equator Network.
- Data or sample: no study sample or dataset; illustrative examples and tables are used, including Table 1 prerequisites and Table 2 specification of “clinical supervision” and “clinician implementation team.”
- Main analysis: narrative argument and proposed extension of reporting guidelines; no statistical analysis is reported.
Limitations
- The paper does not report a formal limitations section; the authors acknowledge room for national or international consensus processes to formalize and extend the proposed guidelines.
- Evident from the text: the recommendations are not empirically tested here, and no data are presented on whether adopting them improves reproducibility, meta-analysis, or implementation outcomes.
- Evident from the text: the scope is limited to specification and reporting of implementation strategies, not a comprehensive reporting guideline for all implementation research designs.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
22 Not checked yet · 14 Own interpretation · 2 No basis given · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“are rarely justified theoretically [10,11]”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Davies P, Walker AE, Grimshaw JM: A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implement Sci. 2010, 5: 1-6. 10.1186/1748-5908-5-1. source
- Not checked yetcites [11] Colquhoun HL, Brehaut JC, Sales A, Ivers N, Grimshaw J, Michie S, Carroll K, Cahlifoux M, Eva KW: A systematic review of the use of theory in randomized controlled trials of audit and feedback. Implement Sci. 2013, 8: 1-8. 10.1186/1748-5908-8-1. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“are part of ‘packaged’ approaches whose specific elements are poorly understood [12]”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Alexander JA, Hearld LR: Methods and metrics challenges of delivery-systems research. Implement Sci. 2012, 7: 1-11. 10.1186/1748-5908-7-1. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Hysong [68] has produced a meta-analysis that documents how different features of audit and feedback impact its effectiveness.”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [68] Hysong SJ: Audit and feedback features impact effectiveness on care quality. Med Care. 2009, 47: 1-8. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181808bb5. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As with clinical interventions, assessing the fidelity of implementation strategy delivery enables a clear test of effectiveness by showing whether or not the strategy was delivered as intended.”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The order or sequence of strategy use may be critical in some cases.”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [77] Lyon AR, Wiltsey Stirman S, Kerns SEU, Burns EJ: Developing the mental health workforce: review and application of training approaches from multiple disciplines. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011, 38: 238-253. 10.1007/s10488-010-0331-y. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Accordingly, implementation strategies may vary in appropriateness and effectiveness across such phases.”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Worse yet, the lack of clarity and depth in the description of implementation strategies within the published literature precludes replication in both research and practice.”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Implementation strategies often lack operational definitions or manuals to guide their use.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“however, there is some theoretical and empirical precedent for relying upon individuals who have more credibility with those whose behavior is expected to change (e.g., the literature on opinion leaders [48,72,73]).”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] Atkins MS, Frazier SL, Leathers SJ, Graczyk PA, Talbott E, Jakobsons L, Adil JA, Marinez-Lora A, Demirtas H, Gibbons RB, Bell CC: Teacher key opinion leaders and mental health consultation in low-income urban schools. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008, 76: 905-908. source
- Not checked yetcites [72] Flodgren G, Parmelli E, Doumit G, Gattellari M, O’Brien MA, Grimshaw J, Eccles MP: Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011, Art. No (Issue 8): CD000125-doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000125.pub4
- Not checked yetcites [73] Rogers EM: Diffusion of innovations. 2003, New York: Free Press, 5
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The phased nature of implementation is also highlighted in several theories, conceptual models, and frameworks.”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA, Friedman RM, Wallace F: Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature (No. FMHI publication #231). 2005, Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, National Implementation Research Network
- Not checked yetcites [42] Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC: Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009, 4: 1-15. 10.1186/1748-5908-4-1. source
- Not checked yetcites [78] Aarons GA, Hurlburt M, Horwitz SM: Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011, 38: 4-23. 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yet this is not sufficient for full specification.”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 22
- It may state two separate claims as one. 7
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The selection of implementation strategies may be justified by prospective assessments that identify potential needs, barriers, or facilitators—sometimes termed ‘determinants of practice’ [43,55,85,86].”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [43] Flottorp SA, Oxman AD, Krause J, Musila NR, Wensing M, Godycki-Cwirko M, Baker R, Eccles MP: A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: a systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice. Implement Sci. 2013, 8: 1-11. 10.1186/1748-5908-8-1. source
The Background defines determinants of practice as factors that prevent or enable improvement and says they are also called barriers, facilitators, problems, and needs. It describes tailored implementation strategies as based on assessing those determinants before designing interventions matched to them. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites [55] Wensing M, Oxman A, Baker R, Godycki-Cwirko M, Flottorp S, Szecsenyi J, Grimshaw J, Eccles M: Tailored implementation for chronic diseases (TICD): a project protocol. Implement Sci. 2011, 6: 1-8. 10.1186/1748-5908-6-1. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Background links the lack of successful nursing research-utilization interventions to insufficient systematic identification of factors associated with research use. The Discussion (Methodological implications for future research; page unavailable) says identifying which individual nurse characteristics predict research use is needed to design tailored interventions. It does not specifically describe prospective needs, barriers, or facilitators assessments to justify the selection of implementation strategies across practice settings. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Not checked yetcites [85] Bosch M, van der Weijden T, Wensing M, Grol R: Tailoring quality improvement interventions to identified barriers: a multiple case analysis. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007, 13: 161-168. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00660.x. source
- Not checked yetcites [86] Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, Shaw EJ, Cheater F, Flottorp S, Robertson N:Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010, Art. No (Issue 3): CD005470-doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005470.pub2,
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Supported
In the paper
“Implementation strategies are often inconsistently labelled and poorly described [9]”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] Michie S, Fixsen DL, Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP: Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method. Implement Sci. 2009, 4: 1-6. 10.1186/1748-5908-4-1. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All these factors significantly contribute to the challenge of measuring, testing, and effectively employing implementation strategies in actual healthcare practice.”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some strategies could, arguably, be employed only by certain actors.”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Specifically, it would facilitate meta-analysis and replication (in both research and practice), and would increase the comparability of implementation strategies by allowing them to be described in similar ways.”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Existing reporting guidelines and suggested extensions
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, both naming and defining implementation strategies conceptually makes it possible to distinguish one strategy from another.”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A wide range of stakeholders can fill this function, as implementation strategies may be employed or enacted by payers, administrators, intervention developers, outside consultants, personnel within an organization charged with being ‘implementers,’ providers/clinicians/support staff, clients/patients/consumers, or community stakeholders.”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Proctor et al.[47] proposed a taxonomy of implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration and sustainability).”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] Proctor EK, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons GA, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M: Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2011, 38: 65-76. 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Certain strategies may target one or more these implementation outcomes (or other outcomes not identified in the Proctor et al.[47] taxonomy).”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“which makes it difficult to search for empirical studies of implementation strategies, and to compare the effects of different implementation strategies through meta-analyses [9]”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] Michie S, Fixsen DL, Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP: Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method. Implement Sci. 2009, 4: 1-6. 10.1186/1748-5908-4-1. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Applying such guidelines not only to implementation trials but also to articles that focus on the intervention being tested would pushing detail about implementation processes in treatment effectiveness trials and thus accelerate our understanding of strategies.”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Existing reporting guidelines and suggested extensions
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Implementation strategies are inherently complex social interventions, as they address multifaceted and complicated processes within interpersonal, organizational, and community contexts [12,56-58].”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Alexander JA, Hearld LR: Methods and metrics challenges of delivery-systems research. Implement Sci. 2012, 7: 1-11. 10.1186/1748-5908-7-1. source
- Not checked yetcites [56] Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Mitchie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2008, 337: 979-983. 10.1136/bmj.a979. source
- Not checked yetcites [57] Mittman BS: Implementation science in health care. Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice. Edited by: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. 2012, New York: Oxford University Press, 400-418. source
- Not checked yetcites [58] May C: Towards a general theory of implementation. Implement Sci. 2013, 8: 1-14. 10.1186/1748-5908-8-1. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“The literature on implementation has been characterized as a ‘Tower of Babel’ [13]”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] McKibbon KA, Lokker C, Wilczynski NL, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Davis DA, Haynes RB, Straus S: A cross-sectional study of the number and frequency of terms used to refer to knowledge translation in a body of health literature in 2006: a tower of Babel?. Implement Sci. 2010, 5: 1-11. 10.1186/1748-5908-5-1. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Eccles et al.[67] describe five modifiable elements of audit and feedback that alone produce 288 potential forms of audit and feedback”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [67] The Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG): Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implement Sci. 2006, 1: 1-8. 10.1186/1748-5908-1-1. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The complexity of implementation strategies is also a function of where they are directed or the conceptual ‘targets’ they attempt to impact.”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) suggest that authors provide, among other things, a description of the intervention (in this case implementation strategy) and its component parts in sufficient detail so that others could reproduce it, an indication of the main factors that contributed to the choice of the intervention, and initial plans for how the intervention”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Existing reporting guidelines and suggested extensions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [93] Davidoff F, Batalden P, Stevens D, Ogrinc G, Mooney S: Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008, 17 (Supplement 1): i3-i9. source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Adopting these guidelines would address many of the current problems that make it difficult to interpret and use findings from implementation research, such as inconsistent labelling, poor descriptions, and unclear justification for specific implementation strategies [9-11,13].”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Existing reporting guidelines and suggested extensions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] Michie S, Fixsen DL, Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP: Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method. Implement Sci. 2009, 4: 1-6. 10.1186/1748-5908-4-1. source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Davies P, Walker AE, Grimshaw JM: A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implement Sci. 2010, 5: 1-6. 10.1186/1748-5908-5-1. source
- Not checked yetcites [11] Colquhoun HL, Brehaut JC, Sales A, Ivers N, Grimshaw J, Michie S, Carroll K, Cahlifoux M, Eva KW: A systematic review of the use of theory in randomized controlled trials of audit and feedback. Implement Sci. 2013, 8: 1-8. 10.1186/1748-5908-8-1. source
- Not checked yetcites [13] McKibbon KA, Lokker C, Wilczynski NL, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Davis DA, Haynes RB, Straus S: A cross-sectional study of the number and frequency of terms used to refer to knowledge translation in a body of health literature in 2006: a tower of Babel?. Implement Sci. 2010, 5: 1-11. 10.1186/1748-5908-5-1. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Certainly, these problems are evident within the dissemination and implementation science literature [13,62-64]”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] McKibbon KA, Lokker C, Wilczynski NL, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Davis DA, Haynes RB, Straus S: A cross-sectional study of the number and frequency of terms used to refer to knowledge translation in a body of health literature in 2006: a tower of Babel?. Implement Sci. 2010, 5: 1-11. 10.1186/1748-5908-5-1. source
- Not checked yetcites [62] Rabin BA, Purcell P, Naveed S, Moser RP, Henton MD, Proctor EK, Brownson RC, Glasgow RE: Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures. Implement Sci. 2012, 7: 1-11. 10.1186/1748-5908-7-1. source
- Not checked yetcites [63] Rabin BA, Brownson RC, Joshu-Haire D, Kreuter MW, Weaver NL: A glossary of dissemination and implementation research in health. J Public Health Manag. 2008, 14: 117-123. 10.1097/01.PHH.0000311888.06252.bb. source
- Not checked yetcites [64] Rabin BA, Brownson RC: Developing terminology for dissemination and implementation research. Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice. Edited by: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. 2012, New York: Oxford University Press, 23-51. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This point is underscored by the call for ‘hybrid trials’ that advance knowledge about both the treatment and the implementation [15].”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Existing reporting guidelines and suggested extensions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C: Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012, 50: 217-226. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“However, there is a need for the development of a suite of reporting guidelines for different types of implementation research [3].”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Existing reporting guidelines and suggested extensions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] Eccles MP, Armstrong D, Baker R, Cleary K, Davies H, Davies S, Gasziou P, Ilott I, Kinmonth ALL, Leng G, Logan S, Marteau T, Michie S, Rogers H, Rycroft-Malone J, Sibbald B: An implementation research agenda. Implement Sci. 2009, 4: 1-7. 10.1186/1748-5908-4-1. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Linguistic harmony in implementation science will be advanced if authors label or describe implementation strategies using terms that already appear in a published review article, a strategy compilation or taxonomy, or another primary research article.”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Existing reporting guidelines and suggested extensions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, definitions and descriptions of implementation strategies in the literature often lack the clarity required to interpret study results and build upon the knowledge gained through the replication and extension of the research.”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Definitions and examples of implementation strategies
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Implementation strategies often lack operational definitions or manuals to guide their use.
In the paper
“The Equator Network [94] is a repository of reporting guidelines (e.g., CONSORT and STROBE) that can provide guidance to specific research designs and methodologies utilized in implementation research.”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Existing reporting guidelines and suggested extensions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [94] Equator network. http://www.equator-network.org/ ,
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While these determinants of practice could be identified through formal assessment processes, they could also be identified using theory or conceptual models e.g., [87], research literature e.g., [59,60,88-90], or more informal approaches such as brainstorming e.g., [55].”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [87] McSherry LA, Dombrowski SU, Francis JJ, Murphy J, Martin CM, O’Leary JJ, Sharp L, ATHENS Group: ‘It’s A can of worms’: understanding primary care practitioners’ behaviors in relation to HPV using the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2012, 7: 1-16. 10.1186/1748-5908-7-1. source
- Not checked yetcites [59] Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PACAC, Rubin HR: Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines?. JAMA. 1999, 282: 1458-10.1001/jama.282.15.1458. source
- Not checked yetcites [60] Cook JM, Biyanova T, Coyne JC: Barriers to adoption of new treatments: an internet study of practicing community psychotherapists. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2009, 36: 83-90. 10.1007/s10488-008-0198-3. source
- Not checked yetcites [88] Addis ME, Wade WA, Hatgis C: Barriers to dissemination of evidence-based practices: addressing practitioners’ concerns about manual-based psychotherapies. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 1999, 6: 430-441. 10.1093/clipsy.6.4.430. source
- Not checked yetcites [89] Bartholomew NG, Joe GW, Rowan-Szai GA, Simpson DD: Counselor assessments of training and adoption barriers. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007, 33: 193-199. 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.01.005. source
- Not checked yetcites [90] Shapiro CJ, Prinz RJ, Sanders MR: Facilitators and barriers to implementation of an evidence-based parenting intervention to prevent child maltreatment: the triple p-positive parenting program. Child Maltreat. 2012, 17: 86-95. 10.1177/1077559511424774. source
- Not checked yetcites [55] Wensing M, Oxman A, Baker R, Godycki-Cwirko M, Flottorp S, Szecsenyi J, Grimshaw J, Eccles M: Tailored implementation for chronic diseases (TICD): a project protocol. Implement Sci. 2011, 6: 1-8. 10.1186/1748-5908-6-1. source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It would also help to accelerate our understanding of how, why, when, and where they work, and our translation of those findings to real-world improvements in healthcare.”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Existing reporting guidelines and suggested extensions
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Implementation strategies often lack operational definitions or manuals to guide their use.
“lack operational definitions or manuals to guide their use”
The paper relies on this without support.
Too rarely are the specific targets of implementation strategies clearly stated.
“Yet too rarely are the specific targets of implementation strategies clearly stated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most often a number of implementation strategies are combined to form a multifaceted strategy.
“Most often a number of strategies are combined to form a multifaceted strategy such as training, consultation, and audit and feedback.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Implementation strategies can vary tremendously in dosage or intensity.
“implementation strategies also can vary tremendously in dosage or intensity.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The current study provides foundational support for developing a multifaceted implementation strategy (e.g., combining a number of discrete implementation strategies) specifically for ASD-CBOs (Proctor et al., 2013; Squires et al., 2014).”
From Implementation-as-Usual in Community-Based Organizations Providing Specialized Services to Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Mixed Methods Study (2021) · cites this paper as Proctor et al., 2013
In the citing paper
“Recent reviews of the use and application of implementation frameworks in implementation efforts highlight the limited use of frameworks, despite the value in doing so.”
From Ten recommendations for using implementation frameworks in research and practice (2020) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, as outlined by Proctor et al. [8], implementation strategies should be named, defined, and specified, based on seven components enabling their measurement and replication: actor, action, action targets, temporality (when), dose (duration and how often), outcomes, and theory/justification.”
From Ten recommendations for using implementation frameworks in research and practice (2020) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Even when strategies are reported in study protocols or empirical articles, there are numerous problems with their description, including inconsistent labeling; lack of operational definitions; poor description and absence of manuals to guide their use; and lack of a clear theoretical, empirical, or pragmatic justification for how the strategies were developed and applied (4).”
From Enhancing the Impact of Implementation Strategies in Healthcare: A Research Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“A number of reporting guidelines could be leveraged to improve descriptions of strategies (4, 96–100).”
From Enhancing the Impact of Implementation Strategies in Healthcare: A Research Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Poor reporting clouds the interpretation of results, precludes replication in research and practice, and limits our ability to synthesize findings across studies (4, 92).”
From Enhancing the Impact of Implementation Strategies in Healthcare: A Research Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Another potential limitation comes from the ERIC taxonomy itself—i.e., strategy listings like ERIC are only useful when they are widely adopted and used in conjunction with guidelines for specifying and reporting strategies [1] in protocol and outcome papers.”
From A systematic review of experimentally tested implementation strategies across health and human service settings: evidence from 2010-2022 (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Names and definitions do not adequately differentiate who enacted the strategies or for what purpose, resulting in findings that are not “readily comparable” or amendable to the synthesis needed to build the evidence base for their use [5].”
From Beyond “implementation strategies”: classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice (2017) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“Proctor et al. [5] recommended that authors not only name and define their implementation strategies but also describe how they operationalized the strategy in their study. Specifically, they recommended specifying who enacted the strategy (i.e., the actor), the level and determinants that were targeted (action targets), and the intended implementation outcomes.”
From Beyond “implementation strategies”: classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice (2017) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“Building on Proctor et al.’s [5] reporting guidelines, the proposed classification system adds greater conceptual clarity to these definitions by classifying strategies according to who enacts them (actor) and the levels and determinants they target (action targets).”
From Beyond “implementation strategies”: classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice (2017) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“For example, respective subdomains within the implementation strategy domain of the CICI framework align with the work of Proctor and colleagues [83].”
From Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework (2017) · cites this paper as [83]
In the citing paper
“An overarching synthesis of the empirical evidence [13] identified 83 conditions to be important for successful implementation of interventions and policies promoting a healthy diet, physical activity (PA), and a reduction in sedentary behaviour using the five domains of the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) evaluation framework [14, 15].”
From Barriers, facilitators and capacities for childhood obesity prevention in 12 European nations: results of a policy-maker survey (2018) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
“| 2) Define it | Define the implementation strategy and any discrete components operationally | Abraham & Michie [38] |”
§ Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting > The need for better specification and reporting of implementation strategies > Prerequisites to studying implementation strategies empirically
“A second step is to define the implementation strategy conceptually. This is distinct from the operationalization of the strategy, which will be addressed below.”
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
Valente, T. W. (2003) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000061743.67794.c4 · Cited by 20,559
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 · Cited by 14,496
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 · Cited by 13,697
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a1655 · Cited by 10,995 · cited 1×
“Implementation strategies are inherently complex social interventions, as they address multifaceted and complicated processes within interpersonal, organizational, and community contexts [12,56-58].”
BackgroundProctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7 · Cited by 8,721
Self-citationMichie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., Eccles, M. P., Cane, J., & Wood, C. E. (2013) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6 · Cited by 7,629
Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations
GREENHALGH, T., ROBERT, G., MACFARLANE, F., BATE, P., & KYRIAKIDOU, O. (2004) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.0887-378x.2004.00325.x · Cited by 7,448
Deming, W. E. (1982) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,297
Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?: A Framework for Improvement
Cabana, M. D., Rand, C. S., Powe, N. R., Wu, A. W., Wilson, M. H., Abboud, P.-A. C., & Rubin, H. R. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.15.1458 · Cited by 6,677
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group: Data Collection Checklist. 2002, 1-30. http://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/uploads/datacollectionchecklist.pdf ,
- Institute for Healthcare Improvement: The breakthrough series: IHI’s colaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. 2003, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement
- Massoud MR, Nielsen GA, Nolan K, Nolan T, Schall MW, Sevin CA: A framework for spread: from local improvements to system-wide change. 2006, Institute for Healthcare Improvement: Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Proctor EK, Powell BJ, Feely M: Measurement issues in dissemination and implementation science. Child and adolescent therapy: dissemination and implementation of empirically supported treatments. Edited by: Beidas RS, Kendall PC. New York: Oxford University Press, In Press
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,003
Proactive Referral to Behavioral Smoking Cessation Programs by Healthcare Staff: A Systematic Review
van Westen-Lagerweij, N. A., Walters, B. H., Potyka, F., Croes, E. A., & Willemsen, M. C. (2022) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntac262 · Cited by 31
Classification schemes for knowledge translation interventions: a practical resource for researchers
Slaughter, S. E., Zimmermann, G. L., Nuspl, M., Hanson, H. M., Albrecht, L., Esmail, R., Sauro, K. M., Newton, A. S., Donald, M., Dyson, M. P., et al. (2017) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0441-2 · Cited by 30
Baldwin, L., Fischer, M. A., Powell, J., Holden, E., Tuzzio, L., Fagnan, L. J., Hummel, J., & Parchman, M. L. (2018) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1097/ceh.0000000000000224 · Cited by 30
Effects of Practice Turnover on Primary Care Quality Improvement Implementation
Baron, A. N., Hemler, J. R., Sweeney, S. M., Woodson, T. T., Cuthel, A. M., Crabtree, B. F., & Cohen, D. J. (2019) · American Journal of Medical Quality · doi:10.1177/1062860619844001 · Cited by 30
Fall prevention implementation strategies in use at 60 United States hospitals: a descriptive study
Turner, K. L., Staggs, V. S., Potter, C., Cramer, E., Shorr, R. I., & Mion, L. C. (2020) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010642 · Cited by 30
Rogal, S. S., Yakovchenko, V., Morgan, T. R. M., Bajaj, J. S., Gonzalez, R. I., Park, A., Beste, L. A., Miech, E. J., Lamorte, C., Neely, B., et al. (2020) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-020-01050-7 · Cited by 30
Self-citationPaulsen, M. M., Varsi, C., & Andersen, L. F. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06236-3 · Cited by 30
Implementation strategies in the context of medication reconciliation: a qualitative study
Stolldorf, D. P., Ridner, S. H., Vogus, T. J., Roumie, C. L., Schnipper, J. L., Dietrich, M. S., Schlundt, D. G., & Kripalani, S. B. (2021) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-021-00162-5 · Cited by 30
Albasha, N., Ahern, L., O’Mahony, L., McCullagh, R., Cornally, N., McHugh, S., & Timmons, S. (2023) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-023-03738-z · Cited by 30
White, M. C., Baxter, L. S., Close, K. L., Ravelojaona, V., Rakotoarison, H. N., Bruno, E., Herbert, A., Andean, V., Callahan, J., Andriamanjato, H. H., et al. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191849 · Cited by 30
Paudyal, N., Parajuli, K. R., García-Larsen, V., Adhikari, R. K., Devkota, M. D., Rijal, S., Chitekwe, S., & Torlesse, H. (2021) · Maternal and Child Nutrition · doi:10.1111/mcn.13173 · Cited by 30
Jennings, P. A. (2023) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-022-02062-8 · Cited by 30
Zhang, Z., Yu, Q., Chen, Y., Zou, L., Ludyga, S., Mavilidi, M. F., Lubans, D. R., Li, J., Hillman, C. H., Wang, J., et al. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10049-9 · Cited by 30
DeSisto, C. L., Estrich, C. G., Kroelinger, C. D., Goodman, D. A., Pliska, E. S., Mackie, C. N., Waddell, L. F., & Rankin, K. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0674-9 · Cited by 29
Garner, B. R., Lwin, A. K., Strickler, G. K., Hunter, B. D., & Shepard, D. S. (2018) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0774-1 · Cited by 32
Kroelinger, C. D., Morgan, I. A., DeSisto, C. L., Estrich, C. G., Waddell, L. F., Mackie, C. N., Pliska, E. S., Goodman, D. A., Cox, S. N., Velonis, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Women s Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2018.7083 · Cited by 29
Fidelity of Implementation in the Field of Learning Disabilities
Sanetti, L. M. H., & Luh, H.-J. (2019) · Learning Disability Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0731948719851514 · Cited by 29
Bunger, A. C., Chuang, E., Girth, A. M., Lancaster, K. E., Gadel, F., Himmeger, M., Saldana, L., Powell, B. J., & Aarons, G. A. (2020) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-020-01016-9 · Cited by 30
Self-citationHoudeshell, M., Thomas, K. M., King, A. A., & L’Hotta, A. J. (2021) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.05.021 · Cited by 29
The Mechanisms of Implementation Support - Findings from a Systematic Integrative Review
Albers, B., Metz, A. J. R., Burke, K., Bührmann, L., Bartley, L., Driessen, P., & Varsi, C. (2021) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/10497315211042375 · Cited by 31
Strategies for Implementing Machine Learning Algorithms in the Clinical Practice of Radiology
Chae, A., Yao, M. S., Sagreiya, H., Goldberg, A. D., Chatterjee, N. R., MacLean, M. T., Duda, J., Elahi, A., Borthakur, A., Ritchie, M. D., et al. (2024) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.223170 · Cited by 29
Jäger, C., Steinhäuser, J., Freund, T., Baker, R., Agarwal, S., Godycki-Ćwirko, M., Kowalczyk, A., Aakhus, E., Granlund, I., van Lieshout, J., et al. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0473-8 · Cited by 30
Khadjesari, Z., Vitoratou, S., Sevdalis, N., & Hull, L. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017972 · Cited by 29
Variability in clinician intentions to implement specific cognitive-behavioral therapy components
Wolk, C. B., Becker‐Haimes, E. M., Fishman, J., Affrunti, N. W., Mandell, D. S., & Creed, T. A. (2019) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-019-2394-y · Cited by 29
Lyon, A. R., Liu, F. F., Connors, E. H., King, K. M., Coifman, J. I., Cook, H., McRee, E., Ludwig, K., Law, A., Dorsey, S., et al. (2022) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-022-00325-y · Cited by 28
on behalf of the PVS group, Gonzalo Grandes, O., Sánchez, Á., Cortada, J. M., Pombo, H., Martinez, C., Balagué, L., Corrales, M. H., de la Peña, E., Mugica, J., et al. (2017) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/s13104-017-3040-8 · Cited by 28
van Rooijen, M., Lenzen, S. A., Dalemans, R. J. P., Beurskens, A. J. H. M., & Moser, A. (2020) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13147 · Cited by 28
HIV Care Continuum Interventions for Transgender Women: A Topical Review
Goldhammer, H., Marc, L. G., Psihopaidas, D., Chavis, N. S., Massaquoi, M., Cahill, S., Rebchook, G., Reisner, S. L., Mayer, K. H., Cohen, S. M., et al. (2022) · Public Health Reports · doi:10.1177/00333549211065517 · Cited by 28
Chinese College Students’ Attitudes towards Animal Welfare
Platto, S., Serres, A., & Jingyi, A. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12020156 · Cited by 28
Smith, J. D., Merle, J. L., Webster, K., Cahue, S., Penedo, F. J., & Garcia, S. F. (2022) · Frontiers in Health Services · doi:10.3389/frhs.2022.983217 · Cited by 28
McHugh, S., Riordan, F., Kerins, C., Curran, G. M., Lewis, C. C., Presseau, J., Wolfenden, L., & Powell, B. J. (2023) · HRB Open Research · doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.13675.1 · Cited by 28
Self-citationEffect of ICU care bundles on long-term patient-relevant outcomes: a scoping review
Paul, N., Buse, E. R., Knauthe, A.-C., Nothacker, M., Weiß, B., & Spies, C. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070962 · Cited by 30
Shin, H. D., Durocher, K., Sequeira, L., Zaheer, J., Torous, J. B., & Strudwick, G. (2023) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-023-09254-5 · Cited by 28
Recommendations and Next Steps For Competency-Based Pharmacy Education
Rhoney, D. H., Chen, A. M. H., Churchwell, M. D., Daugherty, K. K., Jarrett, J. B., Kleppinger, E. L., Nawarskas, J. J., Sibicky, S. L., Stowe, C. D., & Meyer, S. M. (2023) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100549 · Cited by 28
Wuchner, S. S., Murray, L. L., McLennon, S. M., & Bakas, T. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience Nursing · doi:10.1097/jnn.0000000000000237 · Cited by 28
Campbell, C. B., HENDRY, P. J., Delva, D., Danilovich, N., & Kitto, S. C. (2020) · Family Medicine · doi:10.22454/fammed.2020.594402 · Cited by 28
Yakovchenko, V., Morgan, T. R., Chinman, M. J., Powell, B. J., Gonzalez, R., Park, A., Malone, P. S., Chartier, M., Ross, D., & Rogal, S. S. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-07312-4 · Cited by 27
Self-citationDopp, A. R., Hunter, S. B., Godley, M. D., Pham, C., Han, B., Smart, R., Cantor, J., Kilmer, B., Hindmarch, G., González, I. E., et al. (2022) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-022-00298-y · Cited by 28
Reporting on Interventions: Issues and Guidelines for Rehabilitation Researchers
Dijkers, M. P. J. M. (2015) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.017 · Cited by 27
Implementation Strategies for Gender-Sensitive Public Health Practice: A European Workshop
Oertelt‐Prigione, S., Dalibert, L., Verdonk, P., Stutz, E. Z., & Klinge, I. I. (2017) · Journal of Women s Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2017.6592 · Cited by 27
Appelhof, B., Bakker, C., den IJssel, J. C. L. V. D., Zwijsen, S. A., Smalbrugge, M., Verhey, F. R. J., de Vugt, M. E., Zuidema, S. U., & Koopmans, R. T. C. M. (2018) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2018.02.013 · Cited by 27
Adapting Translational Research Methods to Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene
Setty, K., Cronk, R., George, S., Anderson, D. M., O’Flaherty, G., & Bartram, J. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16204049 · Cited by 30
McMaster, K. L., Baker, K., Donegan, R. E., Hugh, M. L., & Sargent, K. (2020) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/0741932520934099 · Cited by 27
Naslund, J. A., Kalha, J., Restivo, J. L., Amarreh, I., Callands, T. A., Chen, H., Gómez–Restrepo, C., Hamoda, H. M., Kapoor, A., Levkoff, S. E., et al. (2021) · Asian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102557 · Cited by 27
Strategies to Integrate Genomic Medicine into Clinical Care: Evidence from the IGNITE Network
Sperber, N. R., Dong, O. M., Roberts, M. C., Dexter, P. R., Elsey, A. R., Ginsburg, G. S., Horowitz, C. R., Johnson, J. A., Levy, K. D., Ong, H. H., et al. (2021) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm11070647 · Cited by 27
Valentine, S. E., Fuchs, C. H., Carlson, M., & Elwy, A. R. (2021) · Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy · doi:10.1037/tra0001145 · Cited by 27
Akiba, C. F., Powell, B. J., Pence, B. W., Muessig, K. E., Golin, C. E., & Go, V. F.-L. (2022) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-022-00365-4 · Cited by 27
Self-citationLyon, A. R., Lewis, C. C., Melvin, A., Boyd, M. R., Nicodimos, S., Liu, F. F., & Jungbluth, N. J. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0495-2 · Cited by 28
Barriers to the Implementation of Strategic Decisions: Evidence from Hotels in a Developing Country
Köseoğlu, M. A., Yazıcı, S., & Okumuş, F. (2017) · Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management · doi:10.1080/19368623.2018.1402723 · Cited by 27
Garner, B. R., Zehner, M. E., Roosa, M. R., Martino, S., Gotham, H. J., Ball, E. L., Stilen, P., Speck, K. J., Vandersloot, D., Rieckmann, T. R., et al. (2017) · Addiction Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1186/s13722-017-0096-7 · Cited by 27
Westgard, C. M., & Fleming, W. O. (2020) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00411 · Cited by 27
Wright, N. J., Langer, M., Norman, I., Akhbari, M., Wafford, Q. E., Ade‐Ajayi, N., Davies, J. I., Poenaru, D., Sevdalis, N., & Leather, A. (2018) · BMJ Paediatrics Open · doi:10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000392 · Cited by 26
Gold, R. B., Bunce, A., Cowburn, S., Davis, J. V., Nelson, J. C., Nelson, C. A., Hicks, E. M., Cohen, D. J., Horberg, M. A., Melgar, G., et al. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0948-5 · Cited by 26
Quanbeck, A., Almirall, D., Jacobson, N. A., Brown, R., Landeck, J., Madden, L. M., Cohen, A., Deyo, B. M. F., Robinson, J., Johnson, R. A., et al. (2020) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-020-00990-4 · Cited by 29
Ibekwe, L. N., Walker, T. J., Ebunlomo, E. O., Ricks, K. A. B., Prasad, S., Savas, L. S., & Fernández, M. E. (2020) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839920957979 · Cited by 26
Swindle, T., McBride, N. M., Selig, J. P., Johnson, S. L., Whiteside-Mansell, L., Martin, J., Staley, A., & Curran, G. M. (2021) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-021-01119-x · Cited by 26
Chinman, M., Acosta, J., Ebener, P. A., & Shearer, A. L. (2021) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-021-01286-9 · Cited by 26
Amano, T., Hooley, C., Strong, J., & Inoue, M. (2021) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.5641 · Cited by 26
Barnes, C., Yoong, S. L., Nathan, N., Wolfenden, L., Wedesweiler, T., Kerr, J., Ward, D. S., & Grady, A. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/25902 · Cited by 26
Hagedorn, H., Gustavson, A. M., Ackland, P. E., Bangerter, A. K., Bounthavong, M., Clothier, B. A., Harris, A. H. S., Kenny, M. E., Noorbaloochi, S., Salameh, H. A., et al. (2022) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-021-07274-7 · Cited by 26
Dekker, M., Jongerden, I. P., de Bruijne, M. C., Jelsma, J. G. M., Vandenbroucke‐Grauls, C. M. J. E., & van Mansfeld, R. (2022) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2022.07.005 · Cited by 26
McGinty, E. E., Seewald, N. J., Bandara, S. N., Cerdá, M., Daumit, G. L., Eisenberg, M. D., Griffin, B. A., Igusa, T., Jackson, J. W., Kennedy‐Hendricks, A., et al. (2022) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-022-01427-8 · Cited by 26
Harnessing the strength of families to prevent social problems and promote adolescent well-being
Lippold, M. A., & Jensen, T. M. (2017) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.066 · Cited by 29
Peck, G., & Hanna, J. (2018) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2018.87 · Cited by 26
Ndlovu, J. N., Lind, J., Patlán, A. B., Upadhaya, N., Leku, M. R., Akellot, J., Skovdal, M., Augustinavicius, J., & Tol, W. A. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-11704-7 · Cited by 27
Piper, K. N., Haardörfer, R., Escoffery, C., Sheth, A. N., & Sales, J. M. (2021) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-021-00148-3 · Cited by 25
Ament, S. M. C., van den Broek, L. M., Everdingen, M. H. J. V. D. B.-V., Boyne, J. J., Maessen, J. M. C., Bekkers, S. C. A. M., Bellersen, L., Rocca, H. B., Engels, Y., & Janssen, D. J. A. (2022) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-021-00896-y · Cited by 25
Roche, S. D., Barnabee, G., Omollo, V. O., Mogaka, F. O., Odoyo, J. B., Bukusi, E. A., Morton, J. F., Johnson, R. E., Celum, C., Baeten, J. M., et al. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-07742-8 · Cited by 25
Crable, E. L., Grogan, C. M., Purtle, J., Roesch, S. C., & Aarons, G. A. (2023) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-023-00396-5 · Cited by 25
The Pursuit of Quality for Social Work Practice: Three Generations and Counting
Proctor, E. K. (2017) · Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research · doi:10.1086/693431 · Cited by 32
Self-citationCash‐Gibson, L., Tigova, O., Alonso, A., Binkley, G., & Rosenmöller, M. (2019) · International Journal of Integrated Care · doi:10.5334/ijic.4178 · Cited by 25
Austin, E. J., LeRouge, C., Hartzler, A. L., Chung, A. E., Segal, C. D., & Lavallee, D. C. (2019) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz042 · Cited by 25
Nelson‐Brantley, H. V., Buller, C., Befort, C. A., Ellerbeck, E. F., Shifter, A., & Ellis, S. D. (2019) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/jnu.12513 · Cited by 25
Christie, H. L., Boots, L. M. M., Peetoom, K. K. B., Tange, H. J., Verhey, F. R. J., & de Vugt, M. E. (2020) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/18624 · Cited by 25
Nwaozuru, U., Murphy, P., Richard, A., Obiezu‐Umeh, C., Shato, T., Obionu, I. M., Gbaja-Biamila, T. A., Oladele, D. A., Mason, S., Takenaka, B. P., et al. (2025) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-025-00716-x · Cited by 27
Tabak, R. G., Kandula, N. R., Angell, S. Y., Brewer, L. C., Grandner, M. A., Hayman, L. L., Ing, C. T., Joseph, J. J., Moise, N., Nelson, S. E., et al. (2025) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001349 · Cited by 24
Garcia-Quintero, X., Parra‐Lara, L. G., Claros-Hulbert, A., Suarez, M. I. C., Garcia, W. C. G., Desbrandes, F., & Arias-Casais, N. (2020) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-020-00674-2 · Cited by 24
Damush, T. M., Miech, E. J., Rattray, N. A., Homoya, B. J., Penney, L., Cheatham, A. J., Baird, S. A., Myers, J. L., Austin, C., Myers, L. J., et al. (2020) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-020-06100-w · Cited by 24
Specifying and reporting implementation strategies used in a school-based prevention efficacy trial
Moore, S. A., Arnold, K. T., Beidas, R. S., & Mendelson, T. (2021) · Implementation Research and Practice · doi:10.1177/26334895211047841 · Cited by 24
Core implementation strategies for improving cirrhosis care in the Veterans Health Administration
Yakovchenko, V., Morgan, T. R. M., Miech, E. J., Neely, B., Lamorte, C., Gibson, S. P., Beste, L. A., McCurdy, H. M., Scott, D., Gonzalez, R. I., et al. (2022) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.32395 · Cited by 24
Self-citationWalker, T. J., Szeszulski, J., Robertson, M. C., Cuccaro, P. M., & Fernández, M. E. (2022) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102051 · Cited by 24
Kang, E., & Foster, E. R. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.834473 · Cited by 24
Implementing PrEP Services in Diverse Health Care Settings
Faro, E. Z., Mantell, J. E., Gonzalez-Argoti, T., Hoffman, S., Edelstein, Z. R., Tsoi, B. W., & Bauman, L. J. (2022) · JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes · doi:10.1097/qai.0000000000002971 · Cited by 24
Michaud, T. L., Pereira, E. L., Porter, G. C., Golden, C. A., Hill, J. L., Kim, J., Wang, H., Schmidt, C., & Estabrooks, P. A. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060785 · Cited by 29
Fridberg, H., Wallin, L., & Tistad, M. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08516-y · Cited by 24
Kamran, R., Jackman, L., Laws, A., Stepney, M., Harrison, C. J., Jain, A., & Rodrigues, J. N. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0301922 · Cited by 24
Co-design of harm reduction materials for people who inject drugs to implement research findings
Hussey, D., Trinder-Widdess, Z., Dee, C., Bagnall, D. M., Bojangles, T., & Kesten, J. M. (2019) · Harm Reduction Journal · doi:10.1186/s12954-019-0300-z · Cited by 24
Kelly, N. K., Maokola, W. M., Mudasiru, O., & McCoy, S. I. (2019) · Current HIV/AIDS Reports · doi:10.1007/s11904-019-00451-8 · Cited by 24
Nettlefold, L., Naylor, P., MACDONALD, H. M., & McKay, H. A. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18105182 · Cited by 24
Reuter, K., Genao, K., Callanan, E. M., Cannone, D. E., Giardina, E. V., Rollman, B. L., Singer, J. R., Slutzky, A. R., Ye, S., Duran, A. T., et al. (2022) · Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.122.009338 · Cited by 24
Wensing, M., Sales, A., Wilson, P., Armstrong, R., Kislov, R., Rankin, N. M., Ramaswamy, R., & Xu, D. (2021) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-021-01175-3 · Cited by 23
Drahota, A., Meza, R. D., Bustos, T. E., Sridhar, A., Martinez, J. I., Brikho, B., Stahmer, A. C., & Aarons, G. A. (2021) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-020-01084-5 · Cited by 24
Fontaine, G., Poitras, M.-È., Sasseville, M., Pomey, M., Ouellet, J., Brahim, L. O., Wasserman, S., Bergeron, F., & Lambert, S. (2024) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-024-02512-5 · Cited by 23
Bouckley, T., Peiris, D., Nambiar, D., Mishra, S., Sood, T., Purwar, P., Elshaug, A. G., Landon, B. E., Pearson, S., Schneider, C. H., et al. (2025) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/s12939-025-02436-z · Cited by 24
Jones, L. A., Gordon, E. J., Hogan, T. P., Fiandaca, C. A., Smith, B. M., Stroupe, K. T., & Fischer, M. J. (2021) · Kidney360 · doi:10.34067/kid.0000642021 · Cited by 23
Long, J. C., Sarkies, M., Francis‐Auton, E., Nguyen, H. M., Pomare, C., Hardwick, R., & Braithwaite, J. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058158 · Cited by 24
Schroeck, F. R., Ismail, A. A. O., Haggstrom, D. A., Sanchez, S. L., Walker, D. R., & Zubkoff, L. (2022) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-022-01231-6 · Cited by 23
Gimbel, S., Ásbjörnsdóttir, K., Banek, K., Borges, M., Crocker, J., Coutinho, J., Cumbe, V., Dinis, A., Eastment, M. C., Gaitho, D., et al. (2023) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-023-00390-x · Cited by 26
Xu, H. G., Keogh, S. J., Ullman, A. J., Marsh, N. M., Tobiano, G., Rickard, C. M., Clark, J. M., & Griffin, B. R. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.16671 · Cited by 23
Nommsen‐Rivers, L. A., Black, M. M., Christian, P. S., Groh‐Wargo, S. L., Heinig, M. J., Israel-Ballard, K. A., Obbagy, J., Palmquist, A. E. L., Stuebe, A. M., Barr, S. M., et al. (2023) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.01.020 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Proctor, E. K., Powell, B. J., & McMillen, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Proctor, Enola K
- Venue
- Implementation Science
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-139
- ISSN
- 1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3882890
- OpenAlex
- W2126340581
- Semantic Scholar
- 68bffe0075c14ccf625a666aea2891c63262f1b3
- Cited by
- 2,585
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2026: 258 · 2025: 328 · 2024: 464 · 2023: 330 · 2022: 318 · 2021: 277 · 2020: 219 · 2019: 140 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 15
- FWCI
- 53.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Washington University in St. Louis
- Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000448, TL1TR000449, 5p30mh068579-05)
- National Institute of Mental Health (P30-MH-068579, F31MH098478, R25MH080916, T32MH019960)
- National Cancer Institute (U54CA155496)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092950)
- National Center for Research Resources (RR-024992, UL1RR024992)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Keywords
- implementation strategies, reporting guidelines, operationalization, theoretical justification, implementation outcomes, reproducibility, intervention research
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Diffusion of Innovation, Research, Program Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
