Cited by 215Biofuel production and bioconversionAlgal biology and biofuel productionMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Cyanobacterial biomass as carbohydrate and nutrient feedstock for bioethanol production by yeast fermentation

Open access
Möllers, K Benedikt, Cannella, David, Jørgensen, Henning, Frigaard, Niels-Ulrik·2014·Biotechnology for Biofuels

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microbial bioconversion of photosynthetic biomass is a promising approach to the generation of biofuels and other bioproducts. However, rapid, high-yield, and simple processes are essential for successful applications. Here, biomass from the rapidly growing photosynthetic marine cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 was fermented using yeast into bioethanol. RESULTS: The cyanobacterium accumulated a total carbohydrate content of about 60% of cell dry weight when cultivated under nitrate limitation. The cyanobacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation and subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis using lysozyme and two alpha-glucanases. This enzymatic hydrolysate was fermented into ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae without further treatment. All enzyme treatments and fermentations were carried out in the residual growth medium of the cyanobacteria with the only modification being that pH was adjusted to the optimal value. The highest ethanol yield and concentration obtained was 0.27 g ethanol per g cell dry weight and 30 g ethanol L(-1), respectively. About 90% of the glucose in the biomass was converted to ethanol. The cyanobacterial hydrolysate was rapidly fermented (up to 20 g ethanol L(-1) day(-1)) even in the absence of any other nutrient additions to the fermentation medium. CONCLUSIONS: Cyanobacterial biomass was hydrolyzed using a simple enzymatic treatment and fermented into ethanol more rapidly and to higher concentrations than previously reported for similar approaches using cyanobacteria or microalgae. Importantly, as well as fermentable carbohydrates, the cyanobacterial hydrolysate contained additional nutrients that promoted fermentation. This hydrolysate is therefore a promising substitute for the relatively expensive nutrient additives (such as yeast extract) commonly used for Saccharomyces fermentations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1754-6834-7-64

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Glycogen is similar in structure to amylopectin, and therefore hydrolysis of glycogen requires the same amylolytic enzymes used to break down starch.

    “Glycogen is similar in structure to amylopectin, and therefore the hydrolysis of glycogen requires the same amylolytic enzymes, which are used to breakdown starch.”
  • Two reports found that only two enzymes, α-amylase and glucoamylase, are sufficient to partially hydrolyze glycogen and allow subsequent fermentation to ethanol.

    “In fact, two reports found that only two enzymes, i.e., α-amylase and glucoamylase, are sufficient to partially hydrolyze glycogen and allow subsequent fermentation to ethanol.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Graham J Wilcox L Graham L Algae 2009 2 San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings (Pearson)
  2. Schlegel HG General Microbiology 1993 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Möllers, K. B., Cannella, D., Jørgensen, H., & Frigaard, N.-U.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Frigaard, Niels-Ulrik
Venue
Biotechnology for Biofuels
Published
2014-04-17
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
64-64
ISSN
1754-6834 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151060130
Cited by
215
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 2
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nordic Energy Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
cyanobacterial biomass, Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002, bioethanol production, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, enzymatic hydrolysis, lysozyme, nitrate limitation, ethanol yield, yeast extract replacement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review