Cited by 60Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural MechanismsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

d-Cycloserine as an augmentation strategy for cognitive behavioral therapy of anxiety disorders

Open access
Hofmann, Stefan G, Wu, Jade Q, Boettcher, Hannah·2013·Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

The goal of this review is to examine the clinical studies on d-cycloserine, a partial glutamatergic N-methyl-D-aspartate agonist, as an augmentation strategy for exposure procedures during cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders. Although cognitive behavioral therapy and anxiolytic medications are more effective than placebo for treating anxiety disorders, there is still considerable room for further improvement. Traditional combination strategies typically yield disappointing results. However, recent studies based on translational research have shown promise to augment the neural circuitry underlying fear extinction with pharmacological means. We discuss the current state of the literature, including inconsistencies of findings and issues concerning the drug mechanism, dosing, and dose timing. D-cycloserine is a promising combination strategy for cognitive behavioral therapy of anxiety disorders by augmenting extinction learning. However, there is also evidence to suggest that d-cycloserine can facilitate reconsolidation of fear memory when exposure procedures are unsuccessful.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/2045-5380-3-11

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pavlov IP Conditioned reflexes 1927 London, UK: Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hofmann, S. G., Wu, J. Q., & Boettcher, H.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Hofmann, Stefan G
Venue
Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders
Published
2013-06-15
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
11-11
ISSN
2045-5380 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158204953
Cited by
59
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6
FWCI
14.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • OpenBU (Boston University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
D-cycloserine, cognitive behavioral therapy, anxiety disorders, augmentation therapy, NMDA receptor agonist, fear extinction, exposure therapy, fear memory reconsolidation, drug augmentation, timing of drug administration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review