Cited by 727Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric AcidInflammasome and immune disordersAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research

A pilot study of IL-1 inhibition by anakinra in acute gout

Open access
So, Alexander, De Smedt, Thibaut, Revaz, Sylvie, Tschopp, Jürg·2007·Arthritis Research & Therapy

Abstract

Monosodium urate crystals stimulate monocytes and macrophages to release IL-1β through the NALP3 component of the inflammasome. The effectiveness of IL-1 inhibition in hereditary autoinflammatory syndromes with mutations in the NALP3 protein suggested that IL-1 inhibition might also be effective in relieving the inflammatory manifestations of acute gout. The effectiveness of IL-1 inhibition was first evaluated in a mouse model of monosodium urate crystal-induced inflammation. IL-1 inhibition prevented peritoneal neutrophil accumulation but TNF blockade had no effect. Based on these findings, we performed a pilot, open-labeled study (trial registration number ISRCTN10862635) in 10 patients with gout who could not tolerate or had failed standard antiinflammatory therapies. All patients received 100 mg anakinra daily for 3 days. All 10 patients with acute gout responded rapidly to anakinra. No adverse effects were observed. IL-1 blockade appears to be an effective therapy for acute gouty arthritis. The clinical findings need to be confirmed in a controlled study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/ar2143

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist, is used effectively to treat autoinflammatory syndromes and gout in patients.

    “Since Anakinra (IL-1ra) is efficiently used in the clinical treatment of autoinflammatory syndromes (26) as well as gout patients (27), the present study suggests a potential use of Anakinra in order to slow down progression of asbestosis, silicosis and possibly other inflammatory lung diseases.”
  • Anakinra was shown to be highly effective in the treatment of patients with gout who could not tolerate or did not respond to previous therapy.

    “Anakinra was shown to be highly effective in the treatment of patients with gout who could not tolerate or did not respond to previous therapy108.”

    From Sterile inflammation: sensing and reacting to damage (2010) · cites this paper as [108]

  • In a clinical study of ten patients with gout, all ten patients treated with anakinra had significant relief from symptoms.

    “Although the clinical study was small, with only ten patients evaluated, all ten patients treated with anakinra had significant relief from symptoms108.”

    From Sterile inflammation: sensing and reacting to damage (2010) · cites this paper as [108]

  • The clinical study of anakinra in gout was small, with only ten patients evaluated.

    “Although the clinical study was small, with only ten patients evaluated, all ten patients treated with anakinra had significant relief from symptoms108.”

    From Sterile inflammation: sensing and reacting to damage (2010) · cites this paper as [108]

  • IL-1 has a crucial role in sterile inflammatory responses.

    “Given the crucial role for IL-1 in sterile inflammatory responses, blockade of IL-1R has been tested as a therapeutic target for sterile inflammatory disorders in humans.”

    From Sterile inflammation: sensing and reacting to damage (2010) · cites this paper as [108]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
So, A., De Smedt, T., Revaz, S., & Tschopp, J.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • University of Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
So, Alexander
Venue
Arthritis Research & Therapy
Published
2007-03-12
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
R28-R28
ISSN
1478-6354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100379211
Cited by
727
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 70
FWCI
45.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Arthritis Research & Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Inflammasome and immune disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
Keywords
anakinra, gout flares, IL-1 inhibition, monosodium urate crystals, NLRP3 inflammasome, IL-1β, neutrophil accumulation, anti-TNF therapy, gout, anti-inflammatory therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Animals, Chemotaxis, Leukocyte, Female, Humans, Interleukin-1, Male, Middle Aged, Peritonitis, Pilot Projects, Uric Acid, Arthritis, Gouty, Mice, Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review