Cited by 39Acute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCircadian rhythm and melatoninCardiac Health and Mental Health

Are daylight saving time transitions associated with changes in myocardial infarction incidence? Results from the German MONICA/KORA Myocardial Infarction Registry

Open access
Kirchberger, Inge, Wolf, Kathrin, Heier, Margit, Kuch, Bernhard, von Scheidt, Wolfgang, Peters, Annette, Meisinger, Christa·2015·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some studies suggest that transitions to and from daylight saving time (DST) have an influence on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) incidence. However, the available publications have a number of limitations e.g. regarding sample size, exclusion of fatal AMI cases, precise assessment of AMI onset, and consideration of possible confounders, and they were conducted in countries with different geographical location. The objective of this study was to examine the association of DST transitions with AMI incidence recorded in the population-based German MONICA/KORA Myocardial Infarction Registry. METHODS: The study sample consisted of 25,499 coronary deaths and non-fatal AMI cases aged 25-74 years. We used Poisson regression with indicator variables for the 3 days or the week after the spring and the autumn transition and adjusted for potential confounders to model the association between DST transitions and AMI incidence. In addition, we built an excess model by calculating observed over expected events per day. RESULTS: Overall, no significant changes of AMI risk during the first 3 days or 1 week after the transition to and from DST were found. However, subgroup analyses on the spring transition revealed significantly increased risks for men in the first 3 days after transition (RR 1.155, 95 % CI 1.000-1.334) and for persons who took angiotensine converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors prior to the AMI (3 days: RR 1.489, 95 % CI 1.151-1.927; 1 week: RR 1.297, 95 % CI 1.063-1.582). After the clock shift in autumn, patients with a prior infarction had an increased risk to have a re-infarction (3 days: RR 1.319, 95 % CI 1.029-1.691; 1 week: RR 1.270, 95 % CI 1.048-1.539). CONCLUSIONS: Specific subgroups such as men and persons with a history of AMI or prior treatment with ACE inhibitors, may have a higher risk for AMI during DST. Further studies which include data on chronotype and sleep duration are needed in order to confirm these results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-015-2124-4

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data from the German MONICA/KORA Myocardial Infarction Registry indicated that specific high-risk subgroups, particularly men, experience a higher risk of acute myocardial infarction during transitions to and from daylight saving time.

    “For instance, data from the German MONICA/KORA Myocardial Infarction Registry indicated that specific high-risk subgroups of the population, particularly men, experience a higher risk of acute myocardial infarction during transitions to and from daylight saving time (114).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirchberger, I., Wolf, K., Heier, M., Kuch, B., von Scheidt, W., Peters, A., & Meisinger, C.
Affiliations
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
  • University Hospital Augsburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Kirchberger, Inge
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2015-08-14
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
778-778
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166854310
Cited by
39
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Gesundheit
  • Helmholtz Zentrum München
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
daylight saving time, time zone transitions, myocardial infarction, acute coronary events, ACE inhibitors, reinfarction, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Registries, Risk Factors, Seasons, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review