Cited by 198Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Discontinuities and cognitive changes in an exposure-based cognitive therapy for depression

Open access
Hayes, Adele M., Feldman, Greg C., Beevers, Christopher G., Laurenceau, Jean-Philippe, Cardaciotto, LeeAnn, Lewis-Smith, Jamie·2007·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Significant shifts or discontinuities in symptom course can mark points of transition and reveal important change processes. The authors investigated 2 patterns of change in depression-the rapid early response and a transient period of apparent worsening that the authors call a depression spike. Participants were 29 patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder who enrolled in an open trial of an exposure-based cognitive therapy. Hierarchical linear modeling revealed an overall cubic shape of symptom change and that both the rapid response and spike patterns predicted lower posttreatment depression. Patients wrote weekly narratives about their depression. Early narratives of rapid responders were coded as having more hope than those of nonrapid responders. The narratives of patients with a depression spike had more cognitive-emotional processing during this period of arousal than those without a spike. Findings are discussed in the context of cognitive-emotional processing theories in depression and anxiety disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.75.3.409

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 108 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayes, A. M., Feldman, G. C., Beevers, C. G., Laurenceau, J.-P., Cardaciotto, L., & Lewis-Smith, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Delaware (US)
  • Simmons University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2007-06
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
409-421
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2118653600
Cited by
198
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
13.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R21-MH62662)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
major depressive disorder, hope, patient narratives
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Cognition Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review