Cited by 145Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and related disordersNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Chronotype differences in timing of energy and macronutrient intakes: A population-based study in adults

Open access
Maukonen, Mirkka, Kanerva, Noora, Partonen, Timo, Kronholm, Erkki, Tapanainen, Heli, Kontto, Jukka, Männistö, Satu·2017·Obesity

Abstract

Objective: To examine the association between chronotype and timing of energy and macronutrient intakes in adults. Methods: The study sample included 1,854 participants from the National FINRISK 2007 and FINDIET 2007 studies, aged 25 to 74 years. Diet was assessed with 48‐hour dietary recalls. Chronotype was assessed with a shortened version of Horne and Östberg's Morningness–eveningness Questionnaire. Associations between chronotype and intakes of energy and macronutrients in the morning (by 10 am ) and in the evening (after 8 pm ) were analyzed with linear regression and ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test. Results: In the morning, evening types had lower energy and macronutrient intakes (except for sucrose of which they had a higher intake) than morning types ( P < 0.05), while in the evening, evening types had higher intakes of energy, sucrose, fat, and saturated fatty acids than morning types ( P < 0.05). On the weekend, chronotype differences in evening intakes of energy, sucrose, and fat intake were more pronounced, and evening types had more eating occasions and more irregular meal times than morning types. Conclusions: Postponed energy and macronutrient intake timing of evening types with unfavorable dietary patterns may put them at higher risk of obesity and metabolic disturbances in the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.21747

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Late chronotypes have a higher frequency of meals with the largest intake at 19:00 to 21:00 compared to early chronotypes, who have their calories more equally distributed over the day.

    “late chronotypes also have a higher frequency of meals with the largest intake at 19:00 to 21:00 compared to early chronotypes, who have their calories more equally distributed over the day (161).”

    From Meal timing and its role in obesity and associated diseases (2024) · cites this paper as [161]

    The Results (page unavailable) report that, on weekends, evening types had their highest energy-intake peak at 7 PM, while morning types had three peaks of approximately equal height at different times of day. This supports the broad contrast in intake timing, but the paper does not establish a higher frequency of meals with the largest intake throughout 19:00–21:00 or an equal distribution of calories across the day for morning types. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In that Finnish study, differences were more pronounced on weekends and evening types reported eating more frequently and irregularly than morning types.

    “These differences were more pronounced in the weekends and evening types reported eating more frequently and irregularly than morning types (72).”
  • In the evening, evening types reported higher intakes of energy, sucrose, fat, and saturated fatty acids than morning types.

    “By contrast, in the evening, evening types reported higher intakes of energy, sucrose, fat, and saturated fatty acids than did morning types.”
  • In a recent Finnish study, evening types reported lower energy and macronutrient intakes in the morning compared with morning types.

    “a recent study in Finland investigating the relation between chronotype and chrono-nutrition found that evening types reported lower energy and macronutrient intakes in the morning compared with morning types according to data collected through the use of 48-h food recalls (72).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maukonen, M., Kanerva, N., Partonen, T., Kronholm, E., Tapanainen, H., Kontto, J., & Männistö, S.
Affiliations
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
Corresponding author
Maukonen, Mirkka
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-23
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
608-615
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2590669223
Cited by
145
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Academy of Finland (136895 and 263836)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
chronotype, meal timing, energy intake, macronutrient intake, sucrose intake, dietary fat intake, saturated fatty acids, obesity risk, metabolic disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Energy Intake, Circadian Rhythm, Diet, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review