Cited by 562Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesInflammasome and immune disorders

Immune phenotypes of microglia in human neurodegenerative disease: challenges to detecting microglial polarization in human brains

Open access
Walker, Douglas G., Lue, Lih-Fen·2015·Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

Abstract

Inflammatory responses in the brain, which can be demonstrated by changes in properties of microglia, the brain-resident macrophages, are a common feature of human neurodegenerative diseases. Different monocyte/macrophage phenotypes have been defined by changes in expression of cytokines, receptors and other markers as a response to different classes of stimuli. Monocytes, macrophages and microglia can have a range of phenotypes with associated properties depending on their microenvironment. Macrophage/microglia polarization states have been defined as classical activation (M1), alternative activation (M2a), type II alternative activation (M2b) or acquired deactivation (M2c). Available markers for identifying microglial phenotypes in human brains are still limited; those available provide incomplete information on the functions or polarization states of microglia observed in tissues from diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis. The most widely used marker to describe activated microglia in human brains, particularly diseased brains, has been HLA-DR, the major histocompatibility complex II protein. HLA-DR-positive microglia can have a wide range of activation morphologies that are affected not only by disease pathology, but also by their differentiation states and brain regions. Two other widely used markers to identify microglia in human brains are ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule-1 and CD68. Although their expression changes in diseased brains, these markers do not show specificity for different phenotypes. Over the years there have been studies with additional markers that attempt to further define microglial properties, particularly in Alzheimer’s disease brains. Most studies have employed immunohistochemical techniques to identify microglia in tissue sections, but recent advances in this field have allowed gene expression profiling of microglia upon immediate isolation from brains. We will review which markers might better define different activation phenotypes of microglia in human brains and whether they fit into current microglial polarization schemes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13195-015-0139-9

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Associating single markers to a distinct microglial phenotype is difficult, since most markers are expressed in several or even all microglial functional states.

    “However, as we will describe in this review, associating single markers to a distinct phenotype is difficult, since most markers are expressed in several or even all microglial functional states (Figure 1, [2]).”

    From Beyond Activation: Characterizing Microglial Functional Phenotypes (2021) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Abstract says that widely used microglial markers do not distinguish different phenotypes, and the CD68 section says that both M1- and M2-polarized cells can express CD68. These passages support the difficulty of assigning a phenotype from a single marker, but do not establish that most markers are expressed in several or all functional states. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Ten studies identified increases in Iba1 cell counts, staining intensity or expression in Alzheimer's disease compared with control samples in at least one brain region.

    “Ten studies identified increases in Iba1 cell counts, staining intensity or expression in AD compared with control samples in at least one brain region,20, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68”

    From Markers of microglia in post-mortem brain samples from patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review (2018) · cites this paper as [60]

    The “Microglia in human brains” section says IBA-1 expression can increase in activated microglia, but it does not report an increase in IBA-1 cell counts, staining, or expression in Alzheimer’s disease samples compared with non-AD controls. Its reported case comparison concerns immunized and control AD cases and found no overall difference in IBA-1 reactivity; the section has no page number in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Approximately twice the volume of Aβ is engulfed within CD68 in 5xFAD microglia compared with 5xFAD SykΔMG microglia.

    “Similarly, approximately twice the volume of Aβ was engulfed within CD68, a well-described marker of microglial phagolysosomes (Walker and Lue, 2015), in 5xFAD microglia compared with 5xFAD SykΔMG microglia (Figures 5C and 5D).”

    From SYK coordinates neuroprotective microglial responses in neurodegenerative disease (2022) · cites this paper as Walker and Lue, 2015

  • IBA1 cannot be used to distinguish between functional microglial phenotypes.

    “Even though IBA1 is often characterized as a typical microglial activation marker [8,9,10], it cannot be used to distinguish between functional microglial phenotypes [2].”
  • CD68 is indicative of phagocytic activity and is upregulated in cell culture after treatment with pro-inflammatory cytokines, lipopolysaccharide and IFNγ.

    “It is indicative of phagocytic activity [2], and is upregulated in cell culture experiments after treatment with pro-inflammatory cytokines, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and IFNγ [98].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. [1]McGeer PL Itagaki S McGeer EG Expression of the histocompatibility glycoprotein HLA-DR in neurological disease Acta Neuropathol. 1988 76 550 557 10.1007/BF00689592 2974227 · DOI
  2. [2]Akiyama H Barger S Barnum S Bradt B Bauer J Cole GM Cooper NR Eikelenboom P Emmerling M Fiebich BL Finch CE Frautschy S Griffin WS Hampel H Hull M Landreth G Lue L Mrak R Mackenzie IR McGeer PL O'Banion MK Pachter J Pasinetti G Plata-Salaman C Rogers J Rydel R Shen Y Streit W Strohmeyer R Tooyoma I Van Muiswinkel FL Veerhuis R Walker D Webster S Wegrzyniak B Wenk G Wyss-Coray T Inflammation and Alzheimer's disease Neurobiol Aging. 2000 21 383 421 10.1016/S0197-4580(00)00124-X 10858586 PMC3887148 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [4]Perry VH Nicoll JA Holmes C Microglia in neurodegenerative disease Nat Rev Neurol. 2010 6 193 201 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.17 20234358 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [5]Waller R Woodroofe MN Francese S Heath PR Wharton SB Ince PG Sharrack B Simpson JE Isolation of enriched glial populations from post-mortem human CNS material by immuno-laser capture microdissection J Neurosci Methods. 2012 208 108 113 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.04.014 22609336 · DOI
  5. [6]Melief J Koning N Schuurman KG Van De Garde MD Smolders J Hoek RM Van EM Hamann J Huitinga I Phenotyping primary human microglia: tight regulation of LPS responsiveness Glia. 2012 60 1506 1517 10.1002/glia.22370 22740309 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [8]Cuzner ML Hayes GM Newcombe J Woodroofe MN The nature of inflammatory components during demyelination in multiple sclerosis J Neuroimmunol. 1988 20 203 209 10.1016/0165-5728(88)90161-0 3058743 · DOI
  7. [9]Mackenzie IR Activated microglia in dementia with Lewy bodies Neurology. 2000 55 132 134 10.1212/WNL.55.1.132 10891923 · DOI
  8. [10]Martinez FO Gordon S The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment F1000Prime Rep 2014 6 13 10.12703/P6-13 24669294 PMC3944738 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [11]Martinez FO Helming L Milde R Varin A Melgert BN Draijer C Thomas B Fabbri M Crawshaw A Ho LP Ten Hacken NH Cobos JV Kootstra NA Hamann J Greaves DR Locati M Mantovani A Gordon S Genetic programs expressed in resting and IL-4 alternatively activated mouse and human macrophages: similarities and differences Blood 2013 121 e57 e69 10.1182/blood-2012-06-436212 23293084 · DOI
  10. [12]Martinez FO Gordon S Locati M Mantovani A Transcriptional profiling of the human monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation and polarization: new molecules and patterns of gene expression J Immunol. 2006 177 7303 7311 10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.7303 17082649 · DOI
  11. [13]Peress NS Fleit HB Perillo E Kuljis R Pezzullo C Identification of Fc gamma RI, II and III on normal human brain ramified microglia and on microglia in senile plaques in Alzheimer's disease J Neuroimmunol. 1993 48 71 79 10.1016/0165-5728(93)90060-C 8227309 · DOI
  12. [14]Wilcock DM Neuroinflammatory phenotypes and their roles in Alzheimer's disease Neurodegener Dis. 2014 13 183 185 10.1159/000354228 24021538 · DOI
  13. [15]Letiembre M Liu Y Walter S Hao W Pfander T Wrede A Schulz-Schaeffer W Fassbender K Screening of innate immune receptors in neurodegenerative diseases: a similar pattern Neurobiol Aging. 2009 30 759 768 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.08.018 17905482 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [16]Liu Y Walter S Stagi M Cherny D Letiembre M Schulz-Schaeffer W Heine H Penke B Neumann H Fassbender K LPS receptor (CD14): a receptor for phagocytosis of Alzheimer's amyloid peptide Brain. 2005 128 1778 1789 10.1093/brain/awh531 15857927 · DOI
  15. [17]Togo T Akiyama H Kondo H Ikeda K Kato M Iseki E Kosaka K Expression of CD40 in the brain of Alzheimer's disease and other neurological diseases Brain Res. 2000 885 117 121 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02984-X 11121537 · DOI
  16. [19]Christie RH Freeman M Hyman BT Expression of the macrophage scavenger receptor, a multifunctional lipoprotein receptor, in microglia associated with senile plaques in Alzheimer's disease Am J Pathol. 1996 148 399 403 8579103 PMC1861668
  17. [20]Zotova E Bharambe V Cheaveau M Morgan W Holmes C Harris S Neal JW Love S Nicoll JA Boche D Inflammatory components in human Alzheimer's disease and after active amyloid-beta42 immunization Brain. 2013 136 2677 2696 10.1093/brain/awt210 23943781 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [23]Akiyama H Nishimura T Kondo H Ikeda K Hayashi Y McGeer PL Expression of the receptor for macrophage colony stimulating factor by brain microglia and its upregulation in brains of patients with Alzheimer's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Brain Res. 1994 639 171 174 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91779-5 7514086 · DOI
  19. [25]Wilcock DM A changing perspective on the role of neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2012 2012 495243 22844636 PMC3403314
  20. [26]Sudduth TL Schmitt FA Nelson PT Wilcock DM Neuroinflammatory phenotype in early Alzheimer's disease Neurobiol Aging. 2013 34 1051 1059 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.09.012 23062700 PMC3579221 · DOI
  21. [28]Doorn KJ Moors T Drukarch B van de Berg W Lucassen PJ van Dam AM Microglial phenotypes and toll-like receptor 2 in the substantia nigra and hippocampus of incidental Lewy body disease cases and Parkinson inverted question marks disease patients Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2014 2 90 25099483 PMC4224021
  22. [29]Zotova E Holmes C Johnston D Neal JW Nicoll JA Boche D Microglial alterations in human Alzheimer's disease following Abeta42 immunization Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2011 37 513 524 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2010.01156.x 21166690 · DOI
  23. [30]Melief J Schuurman KG Van De Garde MD Smolders J Van EM Hamann J Huitinga I Microglia in normal appearing white matter of multiple sclerosis are alerted but immunosuppressed Glia. 2013 61 1848 1861 24014207
  24. [31]Becher B Antel JP Comparison of phenotypic and functional properties of immediately ex vivo and cultured human adult microglia Glia. 1996 18 1 10 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199609)18:1<1::AID-GLIA1>3.0.CO;2-6 8891687 · DOI
  25. [32]Durafourt BA Moore CS Zammit DA Johnson TA Zaguia F Guiot MC Bar-Or A Antel JP Comparison of polarization properties of human adult microglia and blood-derived macrophages Glia. 2012 60 717 727 10.1002/glia.22298 22290798 · DOI
  26. [33]Walker DG Link J Lue LF Dalsing-Hernandez JE Boyes BE Gene expression changes by amyloid beta peptide-stimulated human postmortem brain microglia identify activation of multiple inflammatory processes J Leukoc Biol. 2006 79 596 610 10.1189/jlb.0705377 16365156 · DOI
  27. [34]Colton CA Mott RT Sharpe H Xu Q Van Nostrand WE Vitek MP Expression profiles for macrophage alternative activation genes in AD and in mouse models of AD J Neuroinflammation. 2006 3 27 10.1186/1742-2094-3-27 17005052 PMC1609108 · DOI · Paper page
  28. [35]Walker DG Dalsing-Hernandez JE Campbell NA Lue LF Decreased expression of CD200 and CD200 receptor in Alzheimer's disease: a potential mechanism leading to chronic inflammation Exp Neurol. 2009 215 5 19 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.09.003 18938162 PMC2765462 · DOI
  29. [36]Koning N Swaab DF Hoek RM Huitinga I Distribution of the immune inhibitory molecules CD200 and CD200R in the normal central nervous system and multiple sclerosis lesions suggests neuron–glia and glia–glia interactions J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2009 68 159 167 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181964113 19151626 · DOI
  30. [37]Koning N Van EM Pouwels W Brouwer MS Voehringer D Huitinga I Hoek RM Raes G Hamann J Expression of the inhibitory CD200 receptor is associated with alternative macrophage activation J Innate Immun. 2010 2 195 200 10.1159/000252803 20375636 · DOI
  31. [38]McGeer PL Kawamata T Walker DG Akiyama H Tooyama I McGeer EG Microglia in degenerative neurological disease Glia. 1993 7 84 92 10.1002/glia.440070114 8423066 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [40]Akiyama H Ikeda K Katoh M McGeer EG McGeer PL Expression of MRP14, 27E10, interferon-alpha and leukocyte common antigen by reactive microglia in postmortem human brain tissue J Neuroimmunol. 1994 50 195 201 10.1016/0165-5728(94)90046-9 8120141 · DOI
  33. [41]Kaneko Y Kitamoto T Tateishi J Yamaguchi K Ferritin immunohistochemistry as a marker for microglia Acta Neuropathol. 1989 79 129 136 10.1007/BF00294369 2596262 · DOI
  34. [42]Lopes KO Sparks DL Streit WJ Microglial dystrophy in the aged and Alzheimer's disease brain is associated with ferritin immunoreactivity Glia. 2008 56 1048 1060 10.1002/glia.20678 18442088 · DOI · Paper page
  35. [43]Hoozemans JJ Rozemuller AJ Janssen I De Groot CJ Veerhuis R Eikelenboom P Cyclooxygenase expression in microglia and neurons in Alzheimer's disease and control brain Acta Neuropathol. 2001 101 2 8 11194936
  36. [44]Griciuc A Serrano-Pozo A Parrado AR Lesinski AN Asselin CN Mullin K Hooli B Choi SH Hyman BT Tanzi RE Alzheimer's disease risk gene CD33 inhibits microglial uptake of amyloid beta Neuron. 2013 78 631 643 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.04.014 23623698 PMC3706457 · DOI · Paper page
  37. [45]Walker DG Whetzel AM Serrano G Sue LI Beach TG Lue LF Association of CD33 polymorphism rs3865444 with Alzheimer's disease pathology and CD33 expression in human cerebral cortex Neurobiol Aging. 2015 36 571 582 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.09.023 25448602 PMC4315751 · DOI · Paper page
  38. [47]Nakamichi Y Udagawa N Takahashi N IL-34 and CSF-1: similarities and differences J Bone Miner Metab. 2013 31 486 495 10.1007/s00774-013-0476-3 23740288 · DOI
  39. [48]De I Nikodemova M Steffen MD Sokn E Maklakova VI Watters JJ Collier LS CSF1 overexpression has pleiotropic effects on microglia in vivo Glia. 2014 62 1955 1967 10.1002/glia.22717 25042473 PMC4205273 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walker, D. G., & Lue, L.-F.
Affiliations
Banner Sun Health Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Walker, Douglas G.
Venue
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Published
2015-08-19
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
56-56
ISSN
1758-9193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1667616536
Cited by
562
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 19
FWCI
19.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s Research & Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research (U24 NS072026, 05-901, 211002)
  • Alzheimer's Association
  • Sun Health Foundation (211002, 05-901, U24 NS072026)
  • Arizona Department of Health Services (U24 NS072026, 05-901, 211002, Contract 211002)
  • Arizona Biomedical Research Commission (05–901, Contracts 4001, 0011, 05‐901 and 1001, U24 NS072026, 4001, 0011, 05-901, and 1001, 211002)
  • National Institutes of Health (U24NS07-2026, 05-901, 211002, R21AG044068-1)
  • National Institute on Aging (R21AG034409, R21AG034409-A1, R21AG044068-1, R21AG044068)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS072026, 211002, U24NS072026, 05-901)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Inflammasome and immune disorders
Keywords
microglia, microglial polarization, neurodegenerative diseases, HLA-DR, Iba1, CD68, microglial markers, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, neuroinflammation
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Macrophages, Phenotype, Biomarkers, Microglia, Neurodegenerative Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review