Cited by 228Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsImmune Response and InflammationAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Screening of innate immune receptors in neurodegenerative diseases: A similar pattern

Open access
Letiembre, Maryse, Liu, Yang, Walter, Silke, Hao, Wenlin, Pfander, Tatjana, Wrede, Arne, Schulz-Schaeffer, Walter, Fassbender, Klaus·2009·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

In Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), neuroinflammatory responses are considered to contribute to neuronal injury. Recently, the innate immune receptors, toll-like receptors (TLRs) and the LPS receptor (CD14) have been related to neurodegeneration. In this study, we systematically assessed the expression of most TLRs and CD14 in AD, PD/DLB and ALS using murine models of these diseases and human post-mortem brain tissues. A common upregulation of TLR2 and CD14 was found in all three animal models. While these two receptors could also be detected in AD patient tissues, they were absent from DLB and ALS tissues. This uniform pattern of innate immune response in animal models of neurodegenerative diseases clearly indicates that this response is part of a non-specific neuroinflammatory effector phase rather than a disease-specific event. The less dynamic disease progression in humans and the location (extracellular versus intracellular) of the aggregated proteins deposits might explain the divergent results seen between animal models and human tissues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.08.018

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Letiembre, M., Liu, Y., Walter, S., Hao, W., Pfander, T., Wrede, A., Schulz-Schaeffer, W., & Fassbender, K.
Affiliations
  • Saarland University (DE)
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Fassbender, Klaus
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
759-768
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139463652
Cited by
228
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
innate immune receptors, Toll-like receptors, CD14, neuroinflammation, neurodegenerative diseases, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, TLR2, murine disease models, postmortem brain, protein aggregates
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Animals, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Encephalitis, Female, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Parkinson Disease, Species Specificity, Biomarkers, Up-Regulation, Lipopolysaccharide Receptors, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Lewy Body Disease, Extracellular Fluid, Toll-Like Receptors, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review