Cited by 61Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessNursing care and research

Clinical effectiveness of the START (STrAtegies for RelaTives) psychological intervention for family carers and the effects on the cost of care for people with dementia: 6-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial

Open access
Livingston, Gill, Manela, Monica, O'Keeffe, Aidan, Rapaport, Penny, Cooper, Claudia, Knapp, Martin, King, Derek, Romeo, Renee +4 more·2020·The British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: The START (STrAtegies for RelaTives) intervention reduced depressive and anxiety symptoms of family carers of relatives with dementia at home over 2 years and was cost-effective. Aims: To assess the clinical effectiveness over 6 years and the impact on costs and care home admission. Method: We conducted a randomised, parallel group, superiority trial recruiting from 4 November 2009 to 8 June 2011 with 6-year follow-up (trial registration: ISCTRN 70017938). A total of 260 self-identified family carers of people with dementia were randomised 2:1 to START, an eight-session manual-based coping intervention delivered by supervised psychology graduates, or to treatment as usual (TAU). The primary outcome was affective symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, total score (HADS-T)). Secondary outcomes included patient and carer service costs and care home admission. Results: In total, 222 (85.4%) of 173 carers randomised to START and 87 to TAU were included in the 6-year clinical efficacy analysis. Over 72 months, compared with TAU, the intervention group had improved scores on HADS-T (adjusted mean difference −2.00 points, 95% CI −3.38 to −0.63). Patient-related costs (START versus TAU, respectively: median £5759 v. £16 964 in the final year; P = 0.07) and carer-related costs (median £377 v. £274 in the final year) were not significantly different between groups nor were group differences in time until care home (intensity ratio START:TAU was 0.88, 95% CI 0.58–1.35). Conclusions: START is clinically effective and this effect lasts for 6 years without increasing costs. This is the first intervention with such a long-term clinical and possible economic benefit and has potential to make a difference to individual carers. Declarations of interest: G.L., Z.W. and C.C. are supported by the UCLH National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre. G.L. and P.R. were in part supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) North Thames at Bart's Health NHS Trust. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. Z.W. reports during the conduct of the study; personal fees from GE Healthcare, grants from GE Healthcare, grants from Lundbeck, other from GE Healthcare, outside the submitted work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.2019.160

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study in care homes observed that engagement increased during activities in those who attended the groups.

    “A study in care homes observed engagement increased during activities in those who attended the groups.228”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission (2020) · cites this paper as [228]

    The Intervention and delivery section describes individual therapy for family carers, not group activities in care homes. The Primary outcome section reports carers’ anxiety and depressive symptoms; it does not report increased engagement during activities. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Multicomponent carer interventions reduce family carer depression, burden, or stress and are cost-effective and cost saving.

    “They reduce family carer depression, depression, burden, or stress and are cost-effective and cost saving.”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission (2024) · cites this paper as [486]

    The Abstract describes START as a multicomponent intervention and reports reduced depressive symptoms and cost-effectiveness for family carers of people with dementia. The Main findings report sustained depression benefits, but say START “might actually be cost-saving”; the cost comparison was underpowered. The source therefore does not establish the unqualified claim that these interventions are cost saving. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is evidence that some multicomponent carer interventions are effective in the short and long term; they usually include information about medical and community-based resources, skills training, stress reduction and coping techniques, emotional support, and future planning.

    “There is evidence that some multicomponent carer interventions are effective in the short and long-term; and these usually include information about medical and community-based resources, skills training, stress reduction and coping techniques, providing emotional support and future planning. (2, 482-486)”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission (2024) · cites this paper as [486]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [8]8. Knapp M, King D, Romeo R, Schehl B, Barber J, Griffin M, et al. Cost effective- ness of a manual based coping strategy programme in promoting the mental health of family carers of people with dementia (the START (STrAtegies for RelaTives) study): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 2013; 347: f6342.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Livingston, G., Manela, M., O'Keeffe, A., Rapaport, P., Cooper, C., Knapp, M., King, D., Romeo, R., Walker, Z., Hoe, J., Mummery, C., & Barber, J.
Affiliations
  • St Pancras Hospital (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Corresponding author
Livingston, Gill
Venue
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2019-07-12
Volume
216
Issue
1
Pages
35-42
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2948477228
Cited by
61
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • UWL Repository (University of West London) (acceptedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • London School of Economics and Political Science
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (08/14/06, 08/14/99)
  • King's College London
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
family caregivers, dementia, caregiver depression, anxiety, coping interventions, cost of care, nursing home admission, cost-effectiveness, home care, follow-up care, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, carer support services, long-term care costs
MeSH terms
Psychosocial Intervention, Adaptation, Psychological, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Dementia, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review