Cited by 219Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentPsychiatric care and mental health servicesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Treatment in a specialised out-patient mood disorder clinic v. standard out-patient treatment in the early course of bipolar disorder: randomised clinical trial

Open access
Kessing, Lars Vedel, Hansen, Hanne Vibe, Hvenegaard, Anne, Christensen, Ellen Margrethe, Dam, Henrik, Gluud, Christian, Wetterslev, Jørn, The Early Intervention Affective Disorders (EIA) Trial Group·2013·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Little is known about whether treatment in a specialised out-patient mood disorder clinic improves long-term prognosis for patients discharged from initial psychiatric hospital admissions for bipolar disorder. Aims: To assess the effect of treatment in a specialised out-patient mood disorder clinic v. standard decentralised psychiatric treatment among patients discharged from one of their first three psychiatric hospital admissions for bipolar disorder. Method: Patients discharged from their first, second or third hospital admission with a single manic episode or bipolar disorder were randomised to treatment in a specialised out-patient mood disorder clinic or standard care (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00253071). The primary outcome measure was readmission to hospital, which was obtained from the Danish Psychiatric Central Register. Results: A total of 158 patients with mania/bipolar disorder were included. The rate of readmission to hospital was significantly decreased for patients treated in the mood disorder clinic compared with standard treatment (unadjusted hazard ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.37–0.97, P =0.034). Patients treated in the mood disorder clinic more often used a mood stabiliser or an antipsychotic and satisfaction with treatment was more prevalent than among patients who received standard care. Conclusions: Treatment in a specialised mood disorder clinic early in the course of bipolar disorder substantially reduces readmission to a psychiatric hospital and increases satisfaction with care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.113548

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [36]36. Munk-Jorgensen P, Mortensen PB. The Danish Psychiatric Central Register. Dan Med Bull 1997; 44: 82-4.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kessing, L. V., Hansen, H. V., Hvenegaard, A., Christensen, E. M., Dam, H., Gluud, C., Wetterslev, J., & The Early Intervention Affective Disorders (EIA) Trial Group
Affiliations
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • Capital Region of Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Kessing, Lars Vedel
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2013-03
Volume
202
Issue
3
Pages
212-219
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2120389926
Cited by
219
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10
FWCI
16.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Lundbeckfonden (R44-2009-4195)
  • Rigshospitalet
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
bipolar disorder, hospital readmission, manic episodes, psychiatric hospital discharge, mood stabilizers, antipsychotic drugs, treatment satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Bipolar Disorder, Denmark, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Discharge, Patient Education as Topic, Psychotherapy, Group, Recurrence, Antipsychotic Agents, Health Care Costs, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Antimanic Agents, Young Adult, Time-to-Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review