Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of ANGPTL4 function in macrophages and adipocytes using Angptl4-knockout and Angptl4-hypomorphic mice

Oteng, Antwi-Boasiako, Ruppert, PhilipM.M., Boutens, Lily, Dijk, Wieneke, van Dierendonck, XantheA.M.H., Olivecrona, Gunilla, Stienstra, Rinke, Kersten, Sander·2019·Journal of Lipid Research

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1194/jlr.m094128

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Angptl4 expression is induced in primary macrophages by lipid stimulation or PPAR agonists. A: Angptl4 expression in peritoneal macrophages treated with 0.5 mM oleic acid for 6 h. B: Angptl4 expression in peritoneal macrophages (left) and BMDMs (right) treated for 6 h with 0.5 mM intralipid. C: Heat map of top 10 most upregulated and top 10 most downregulated genes in BMDMs treated for 5 h with 250 uM oleic acid or BSA (vehicle control). Data are from a previously published dataset (GSE77104) (43). D: Angptl4 expression in BMDMs treated for 6 h with 1  M of PPAR agonists, Wy14643 (PPAR  ), GW501516 (PPAR  ), L165041 (PPAR  ), and rosiglitazone (PPAR  ), or vehicle (DMSO). mRNA expression was normalized to 36b4. Data are mean ± SD from three biological replicates; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 relative to vehicle control.
Fig. 1 Angptl4 expression is induced in primary macrophages by lipid stimulation or PPAR agonists. A: Angptl4 expression in peritoneal macrophages treated with 0.5 mM oleic acid for 6 h. B: Angptl4 expression in peritoneal macrophages (left) and BMDMs (right) treated for 6 h with 0.5 mM intralipid. C: Heat map of top 10 most upregulated and top 10 most downregulated genes in BMDMs treated for 5 h with 250 uM oleic acid or BSA (vehicle control). Data are from a previously published dataset (GSE77104) (43). D: Angptl4 expression in BMDMs treated for 6 h with 1  M of PPAR agonists, Wy14643 (PPAR  ), GW501516 (PPAR  ), L165041 (PPAR  ), and rosiglitazone (PPAR  ), or vehicle (DMSO). mRNA expression was normalized to 36b4. Data are mean ± SD from three biological replicates; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 relative to vehicle control.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 2 ANGPTL4 deficiency promotes macrophage lipid uptake and magnifies the induction of lipid-sensitive genes. A: Oil Red O staining of lipid droplets in RAW264.7 macrophages treated with 0.5 mM intralipid for 6 h in the presence or absence of 0.5  g/ml recombinant ANGPTL4. B: Oil Red O staining of lipid droplets in peritoneal macrophages treated for 6 h with lymph (final triglyceride concentration of 2 mM) in the presence or absence of 0.5  g/ml recombinant ANGPTL4. C: Microarray heat map showing expression profile of lipid-sensitive genes in peritoneal macrophages treated for 6 h with 0.5 mM intralipid in the presence or absence of recombinant ANGPTL4. D: Bodipy staining of Angptl4 +/+ and Angptl4  /  BMDMs cultured with regular culture medium (Cntl) or for 6 h with 0.5 mM intralipid with or without orlistat. E, F: mRNA expression of lipid-sensitive genes in Angptl4 +/+ and Angptl4  /  BMDMs treated for 6 h with 0.5 mM intralipid (E) or peritoneal macrophages treated for 6 h with lymph (final triglyceride concentration of 2 mM) (F). mRNA expression was normalized to 36b4. Data are mean ± SD from three biological replicates; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 relative to untreated WT; and # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, and ### P < 0.001 relative to WT + intralipid/lymph.
Fig. 2 ANGPTL4 deficiency promotes macrophage lipid uptake and magnifies the induction of lipid-sensitive genes. A: Oil Red O staining of lipid droplets in RAW264.7 macrophages treated with 0.5 mM intralipid for 6 h in the presence or absence of 0.5  g/ml recombinant ANGPTL4. B: Oil Red O staining of lipid droplets in peritoneal macrophages treated for 6 h with lymph (final triglyceride concentration of 2 mM) in the presence or absence of 0.5  g/ml recombinant ANGPTL4. C: Microarray heat map showing expression profile of lipid-sensitive genes in peritoneal macrophages treated for 6 h with 0.5 mM intralipid in the presence or absence of recombinant ANGPTL4. D: Bodipy staining of Angptl4 +/+ and Angptl4  /  BMDMs cultured with regular culture medium (Cntl) or for 6 h with 0.5 mM intralipid with or without orlistat. E, F: mRNA expression of lipid-sensitive genes in Angptl4 +/+ and Angptl4  /  BMDMs treated for 6 h with 0.5 mM intralipid (E) or peritoneal macrophages treated for 6 h with lymph (final triglyceride concentration of 2 mM) (F). mRNA expression was normalized to 36b4. Data are mean ± SD from three biological replicates; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 relative to untreated WT; and # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, and ### P < 0.001 relative to WT + intralipid/lymph.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 3 ANGPTL4 deficiency increases respiration in BMDMs but does not influence LPL abundance. A: Real-time changes in OCR in BMDMs from Angptl4 +/+ and Angptl4  /  mice in the presence or absence of recombinant ANGPTL4, treated with 0.5 mM intralipid for 6 h, and assessed in unbuffered medium during sequential injections with oligomycin, FCCP, and antimycin A + rotenone. B: Basal (left) and maximal (right) OCR in BMDMs from Angptl4 +/+ and Angptl4  /  mice in the presence or absence of recombinant ANGPTL4 (0.5  g/ml) incubated with 0.5 mM intralipid for 6 h. Measurements were done in quintuplicates in unbuffered medium. Data are mean ± SD; *** P < 0.001. C: Immunoblot of LPL in Angptl4 +/+ and Angptl4  /  BMDMs treated for 6 h with or without 0.5 mM intralipid in the presence or absence of endonuclease-H. D: Immunoblot of LPL from culture medium of Angptl4 +/+ and Angptl4  /  BMDMs treated with or without heparin. E: Immunoblot of LPL in Angptl4 +/+ and Angptl4  /  BMDMs treated with or without ER to Golgi transport inhibitors monensin (Mon; 10  M for 3 h) and Brefeldin A (BFA; 5  g/ml for 4 h), proteasomal degradation inhibitor MG132 (40  M for 4 h), and lysosomal degradation inhibitors, e64d (20  M for 24 h) and leupeptin (Leup; 5  M for 16 h). HSP90 or Coomassie staining serve as loading control.
Fig. 3 ANGPTL4 deficiency increases respiration in BMDMs but does not influence LPL abundance. A: Real-time changes in OCR in BMDMs from Angptl4 +/+ and Angptl4  /  mice in the presence or absence of recombinant ANGPTL4, treated with 0.5 mM intralipid for 6 h, and assessed in unbuffered medium during sequential injections with oligomycin, FCCP, and antimycin A + rotenone. B: Basal (left) and maximal (right) OCR in BMDMs from Angptl4 +/+ and Angptl4  /  mice in the presence or absence of recombinant ANGPTL4 (0.5  g/ml) incubated with 0.5 mM intralipid for 6 h. Measurements were done in quintuplicates in unbuffered medium. Data are mean ± SD; *** P < 0.001. C: Immunoblot of LPL in Angptl4 +/+ and Angptl4  /  BMDMs treated for 6 h with or without 0.5 mM intralipid in the presence or absence of endonuclease-H. D: Immunoblot of LPL from culture medium of Angptl4 +/+ and Angptl4  /  BMDMs treated with or without heparin. E: Immunoblot of LPL in Angptl4 +/+ and Angptl4  /  BMDMs treated with or without ER to Golgi transport inhibitors monensin (Mon; 10  M for 3 h) and Brefeldin A (BFA; 5  g/ml for 4 h), proteasomal degradation inhibitor MG132 (40  M for 4 h), and lysosomal degradation inhibitors, e64d (20  M for 24 h) and leupeptin (Leup; 5  M for 16 h). HSP90 or Coomassie staining serve as loading control.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 4 Hypomorphic ANGPTL4 mice show reduced ANGPTL4 expression and reduced regulation on LPL. A: Schematic map of the Angptl4 locus by knockout first-allele strategy. B: Full ANGPTL4 protein (upper scheme) and predicted sequence of truncated ANGPTL4 (lower scheme) based on sequence analysis of the knockout first-allele mice. mRNA expression of all seven exons of Angptl4 in epididymal adipose tissue (C) and primary adipocytes (D) of Angptl4  /  and Angptl4 hyp mice relative to WT mice. Western blot showing full-length and N-terminal ANGPTL4, and LPL in adipose tissue (E) and primary adipocytes (F) of the Angptl4  /  , Angptl4 hyp , and WT mice. mRNA expression was normalized to 36b4. Data are mean ± SEM. N = 7-11 mice per group. s.e., short exposure; l.e., long exposure.
Fig. 4 Hypomorphic ANGPTL4 mice show reduced ANGPTL4 expression and reduced regulation on LPL. A: Schematic map of the Angptl4 locus by knockout first-allele strategy. B: Full ANGPTL4 protein (upper scheme) and predicted sequence of truncated ANGPTL4 (lower scheme) based on sequence analysis of the knockout first-allele mice. mRNA expression of all seven exons of Angptl4 in epididymal adipose tissue (C) and primary adipocytes (D) of Angptl4  /  and Angptl4 hyp mice relative to WT mice. Western blot showing full-length and N-terminal ANGPTL4, and LPL in adipose tissue (E) and primary adipocytes (F) of the Angptl4  /  , Angptl4 hyp , and WT mice. mRNA expression was normalized to 36b4. Data are mean ± SEM. N = 7-11 mice per group. s.e., short exposure; l.e., long exposure.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 5 Similar regulation on plasma metabolites and LPL between Angptl4 hyp and Angptl4  /  mice after 24 h fast. A: Plasma levels of triglycerides, glucose, cholesterol, NEFAs, and  -hydroxybutyrate in fed (closed bars) and fasted (opened bars) mice. B: mRNA expression from N-terminal (left column) and C-terminal (right column) regions of Angptl4 in epididymal adipose tissues of fed (closed bars) and fasted (opened) mice. C: Western blot of LPL and ANGPTL4 in epididymal adipose tissues from the three groups of mice in fed and fasted state. mRNA expression was normalized to 36b4. Data are mean ± SEM. N = 7-11 mice per group. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 represent significance in fasted group relative to WT fasted mice; # P < 0.05 represents significance in fed group relative to WT fed mice; and §§ P < 0.01 relative to WT fed mice. s.e., short exposure; l.e., long exposure.
Fig. 5 Similar regulation on plasma metabolites and LPL between Angptl4 hyp and Angptl4  /  mice after 24 h fast. A: Plasma levels of triglycerides, glucose, cholesterol, NEFAs, and  -hydroxybutyrate in fed (closed bars) and fasted (opened bars) mice. B: mRNA expression from N-terminal (left column) and C-terminal (right column) regions of Angptl4 in epididymal adipose tissues of fed (closed bars) and fasted (opened) mice. C: Western blot of LPL and ANGPTL4 in epididymal adipose tissues from the three groups of mice in fed and fasted state. mRNA expression was normalized to 36b4. Data are mean ± SEM. N = 7-11 mice per group. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 represent significance in fasted group relative to WT fasted mice; # P < 0.05 represents significance in fed group relative to WT fed mice; and §§ P < 0.01 relative to WT fed mice. s.e., short exposure; l.e., long exposure.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 6 Angptl4 hyp mice have less severe pathological phenotypes in response to 20 weeks of high fat diet compared with Angptl4  /  mice. A: Plasma levels of SAA after 2, 4, and 20 weeks of high fat diet. B: Relative hepatic expression of pro-inflammatory markers in three groups of mice. C: Pictures showing levels of ascites formation in the peritoneum of Angptl4 hyp mice. Arrows pointing toward ascites. D: H&E staining depicting mesenteric panniculitis in Angptl4 hyp mice. E: Images showing Touton giant cells in the mesenteric lymph nodes of Angptl4 hyp and Angptl4  /  mice but not WT mice. Images are 200× magnification; insert is 400× magnification. mRNA expression was normalized to 36b4. Data are mean ± SEM. N = 7-11 mice per group. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 relative to WT.
Fig. 6 Angptl4 hyp mice have less severe pathological phenotypes in response to 20 weeks of high fat diet compared with Angptl4  /  mice. A: Plasma levels of SAA after 2, 4, and 20 weeks of high fat diet. B: Relative hepatic expression of pro-inflammatory markers in three groups of mice. C: Pictures showing levels of ascites formation in the peritoneum of Angptl4 hyp mice. Arrows pointing toward ascites. D: H&E staining depicting mesenteric panniculitis in Angptl4 hyp mice. E: Images showing Touton giant cells in the mesenteric lymph nodes of Angptl4 hyp and Angptl4  /  mice but not WT mice. Images are 200× magnification; insert is 400× magnification. mRNA expression was normalized to 36b4. Data are mean ± SEM. N = 7-11 mice per group. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 relative to WT.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 7 Increased LPL activity and improved glucose tolerance in Angptl4 hyp mice after 20 weeks of high fat diet. A: LPL activity in epididymal adipose tissue of Angptl4 hyp , Angptl4  /  , and WT mice. B: Plasma concentrations of triglycerides, cholesterol, glycerol, and NEFAs in the three groups of mice. Plasma glucose levels (C) and glucose tolerance test (D) in the three groups of mice. Data are mean ± SEM. N = 7-11 mice per group. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 relative to WT. No statistical analysis could be done on glucose tolerance in Angptl4  /  mice due to the use of different time points.
Fig. 7 Increased LPL activity and improved glucose tolerance in Angptl4 hyp mice after 20 weeks of high fat diet. A: LPL activity in epididymal adipose tissue of Angptl4 hyp , Angptl4  /  , and WT mice. B: Plasma concentrations of triglycerides, cholesterol, glycerol, and NEFAs in the three groups of mice. Plasma glucose levels (C) and glucose tolerance test (D) in the three groups of mice. Data are mean ± SEM. N = 7-11 mice per group. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 relative to WT. No statistical analysis could be done on glucose tolerance in Angptl4  /  mice due to the use of different time points.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Hokanson, 1996, Plasma triglyceride level is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease independent of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level: a meta-analysis of population-based prospective studies, J. Cardiovasc. Risk., 3, 213, 10.1097/00043798-199604000-00014 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Onat, 2006, Plasma triglycerides, an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease in men: A prospective study based on a population with prevalent metabolic syndrome, Int. J. Cardiol., 108, 89, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.06.056 · DOI
  3. Goldberg, 2011, Triglycerides and heart disease: still a hypothesis?, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., 31, 1716, 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.226100 · DOI
  4. Kersten, 2014, Physiological regulation of lipoprotein lipase, Biochim. Biophys. Acta., 1841, 919, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.03.013 · DOI
  5. Davies, 2010, GPIHBP1 is responsible for the entry of lipoprotein lipase into capillaries, Cell Metab., 12, 42, 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.04.016 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Beigneux, 2017, Autoantibodies against GPIHBP1 as a cause of hypertriglyceridemia, N. Engl. J. Med., 376, 1647, 10.1056/NEJMoa1611930 · DOI
  7. Goulbourne, 2014, The GPIHBP1-LPL complex is responsible for the margination of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in capillaries, Cell Metab., 19, 849, 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.01.017 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Kim, 2000, Hepatic expression, synthesis and secretion of a novel fibrinogen/angiopoietin-related protein that prevents endothelial-cell apoptosis, Biochem. J., 346, 603, 10.1042/bj3460603 · DOI
  9. Kersten, 2000, Characterization of the fasting-induced adipose factor FIAF, a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor target gene, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 28488, 10.1074/jbc.M004029200 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Yoon, 2000, Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma target gene encoding a novel angiopoietin-related protein associated with adipose differentiation, Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 5343, 10.1128/MCB.20.14.5343-5349.2000 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Zhang, 2012, Lipasin, a novel nutritionally-regulated liver-enriched factor that regulates serum triglyceride levels, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 424, 786, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.07.038 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Quagliarini, 2012, Atypical angiopoietin-like protein that regulates ANGPTL3, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 109, 19751, 10.1073/pnas.1217552109 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Ren, 2012, Identification of RIFL, a novel adipocyte-enriched insulin target gene with a role in lipid metabolism, Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab., 303, E334, 10.1152/ajpendo.00084.2012 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Chi, 2017, ANGPTL8 promotes the ability of ANGPTL3 to bind and inhibit lipoprotein lipase, Mol. Metab., 6, 1137, 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.06.014 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Haller, 2017, ANGPTL8 requires ANGPTL3 to inhibit lipoprotein lipase and plasma triglyceride clearance, J. Lipid Res., 58, 1166, 10.1194/jlr.M075689 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Lichtenstein, 2007, Angptl4 upregulates cholesterol synthesis in liver via inhibition of LPL- and HL-dependent hepatic cholesterol uptake, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., 27, 2420, 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.151894 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Abid, 2016, ANGPTL4 variants E40K and T266M are associated with lower fasting triglyceride levels and predicts cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetic Tunisian population, Lipids Health Dis., 15, 63, 10.1186/s12944-016-0231-6 · DOI
  18. Mandard, 2006, The fasting-induced adipose factor/angiopoietin-like protein 4 is physically associated with lipoproteins and governs plasma lipid levels and adiposity, J. Biol. Chem., 281, 934, 10.1074/jbc.M506519200 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Dijk, 2016, Regulation of lipid metabolism by angiopoietin-like proteins, Curr. Opin. Lipidol., 27, 249, 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000290 · DOI
  20. Mysling, 2016, The angiopoietin-like protein angptl4 catalyzes unfolding of the hydrolase domain in lipoprotein lipase and the endothelial membrane protein gpihbp1 counteracts this unfolding, eLife., 5, e20958, 10.7554/eLife.20958 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Sukonina, 2006, Angiopoietin-like protein 4 converts lipoprotein lipase to inactive monomers and modulates lipase activity in adipose tissue, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 103, 17450, 10.1073/pnas.0604026103 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Dijk, 2018, Angiopoietin-like 4 promotes the intracellular cleavage of lipoprotein lipase by PCSK3/furin in adipocytes, J. Biol. Chem., 293, 14134, 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002426 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Dijk, 2016, Angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4) promotes intracellular degradation of lipoprotein lipase in adipocytes, J. Lipid Res., 57, 1670, 10.1194/jlr.M067363 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Desai, 2007, Lipid-lowering effects of anti-angiopoietin-like 4 antibody recapitulate the lipid phenotype found in angiopoietin-like 4 knockout mice, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 104, 11766, 10.1073/pnas.0705041104 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Lichtenstein, 2010, Angptl4 protects against severe proinflammatory effects of saturated fat by inhibiting fatty acid uptake into mesenteric lymph node macrophages, Cell Metab., 12, 580, 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Oteng, 2017, Feeding Angptl4- / - mice trans fat promotes foam cell formation in mesenteric lymph nodes without leading to ascites, J. Lipid Res., 58, 1100, 10.1194/jlr.M074278 · DOI
  27. Dijk, 2015, ANGPTL4 mediates shuttling of lipid fuel to brown adipose tissue during sustained cold exposure, eLife., 4, 1, 10.7554/eLife.08428 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Singh, 2018, Brown adipose tissue derived ANGPTL4 controls glucose and lipid metabolism and regulates thermogenesis, Mol. Metab., 11, 59, 10.1016/j.molmet.2018.03.011 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Aryal, 2018, Absence of ANGPTL4 in adipose tissue improves glucose tolerance and attenuates atherogenesis, JCI Insight., 3, 97918, 10.1172/jci.insight.97918 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Kroupa, 2012, Linking nutritional regulation of Angptl4, Gpihbp1, and Lmf1 to lipoprotein lipase activity in rodent adipose tissue, BMC Physiol., 12, 13, 10.1186/1472-6793-12-13 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Markwell, 1978, A modification of the Lowry procedure to simplify protein determination in membrane and lipoprotein samples, Anal. Biochem., 87, 206, 10.1016/0003-2697(78)90586-9 · DOI
  32. Bolstad, 2003, A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias, Bioinformatics., 19, 185, 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.185 · DOI
  33. Irizarry, 2003, Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data, Biostatistics., 4, 249, 10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Dai, 2005, Evolving gene/transcript definitions significantly alter the interpretation of GeneChip data, Nucleic Acids Res., 33, e175, 10.1093/nar/gni179 · DOI
  35. Robblee, 2016, Saturated fatty acids engage an IRE1α-dependent pathway to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome in myeloid cells, Cell Reports., 14, 2611, 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.02.053 · DOI
  36. Weinstein, 2008, Abnormal patterns of lipoprotein lipase release into the plasma in GPIHBP1-deficient mice, J. Biol. Chem., 283, 34511, 10.1074/jbc.M806067200 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Mandard, 2004, The direct peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor target fasting-induced adipose factor (FIAF/PGAR/ANGPTL4) is present in blood plasma as a truncated protein that is increased by fenofibrate treatment, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 34411, 10.1074/jbc.M403058200 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Doolittle, 1990, The response of lipoprotein lipase to feeding and fasting, J. Biol. Chem., 265, 4570, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)39601-2 · DOI
  39. Yoshida, 2002, Angiopoietin-like protein 4 is a potent hyperlipidemia-inducing factor in mice and inhibitor of lipoprotein lipase, J. Lipid Res., 43, 1770, 10.1194/jlr.C200010-JLR200 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Georgiadi, 2013, Overexpression of angiopoietin-like protein 4 protects against atherosclerosis development, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., 33, 1529, 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.301698 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Aryal, 2016, ANGPTL4 deficiency in haematopoietic cells promotes monocyte expansion and atherosclerosis progression, Nat. Commun., 7, 12313, 10.1038/ncomms12313 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Cupp, 1987, Heparin decreases the degradation rate of lipoprotein lipase in adipocytes, J. Biol. Chem., 262, 6383, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)45581-0 · DOI
  43. He, 2018, Lipoprotein lipase: biosynthesis, regulatory factors, and its role in atherosclerosis and other diseases, Clin. Chim. Acta., 480, 126, 10.1016/j.cca.2018.02.006 · DOI
  44. Koliwad, 2009, Angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4, fasting-induced adipose factor) is a direct glucocorticoid receptor target and participates in glucocorticoid-regulated triglyceride metabolism, J. Biol. Chem., 284, 25593, 10.1074/jbc.M109.025452 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Davies, 2018, Can targeting ANGPTL proteins improve glucose tolerance?, Diabetologia., 61, 1277, 10.1007/s00125-018-4604-4 · DOI
  46. Gusarova, 2018, Genetic inactivation of ANGPTL4 improves glucose homeostasis and is associated with reduced risk of diabetes, Nat. Commun., 9, 2252, 10.1038/s41467-018-04611-z · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 46

Metadata

Authors
Oteng, A.-B., Ruppert, P. M., Boutens, L., Dijk, W., van Dierendonck, X. M. H., Olivecrona, G., Stienstra, R., & Kersten, S.
Venue
Journal of Lipid Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
60
Issue
10
Pages
1741-1754
ISSN
0022-2275
Cited by
46
References
7
Language
en
Funders
  • Graduate School Voeding
  • Levensmiddelentechnologie
  • Agro-Biotechnologie en Gezondheid
  • CVON ENERGISE (CVON2014-02)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review