Cited by 844Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesStress Responses and CortisolAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Measuring Fecal Glucocorticoid Metabolites in Mammals and Birds: The Importance of Validation

Open access
TOUMA, CHADI, PALME, RUPERT·2005·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

In recent years, the noninvasive monitoring of steroid hormone metabolites in feces of mammals and droppings of birds has become an increasingly popular technique. It offers several advantages and has been applied to a variety of species under various settings. However, using this technique to reliably assess an animal's adrenocortical activity is not that simple and straightforward to apply. Because clear differences regarding the metabolism and excretion of glucocorticoid metabolites (GCMs) exist, a careful validation for each species and sex investigated is obligatory. In this review, general analytical issues regarding sample storage, extraction procedures, and immunoassays are briefly discussed, but the main focus lies on experiments and recommendations addressing the validation of fecal GCM measurements in mammals and birds. The crucial importance of scrutinizing the physiological and biological validity of fecal GCM analyses in a given species is stressed. In particular, the relevance of the technique to detect biologically meaningful alterations in adrenocortical activity must be shown. Furthermore, significant effects of the animals' sex, the time of day, season, and different life history stages are discussed, bringing about the necessity to seriously consider possible sex differences as well as diurnal and seasonal variations. Thus, comprehensive information on the animals' biology and stress physiology should be carefully taken into account. Together with an exten…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1196/annals.1343.006

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
TOUMA, C., & PALME, R.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (DE)
  • University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT)
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-06
Volume
1046
Issue
1
Pages
54-74
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2072631898
Cited by
844
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 48
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • WBI Studies Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Science Foundation
  • HORIZON EUROPE Excellent Science
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
fecal glucocorticoid metabolites, non-invasive hormone measurement, adrenocortical function, analytical method validation, immunoassay, sample storage, sample extraction, sex differences, diurnal variation, seasonal variation, life stages, stress physiology, mammals, birds
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, Circadian Rhythm, Feces, Glucocorticoids, Mammals, Seasons, Sex Factors, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review