Cited by 317Preterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsReproductive tract infections research

Bacteria and inflammatory cells in fetal membranes do not always cause preterm labor

Open access
Steel, Jennifer H, Malatos, Sotiris, Kennea, Nigel, Edwards, A David, Miles, Lynda, Duggan, Philip, Reynolds, Peter R, Feldman, Robert G +1 more·2005·Pediatric Research

Abstract

Intrauterine infection has been frequently linked with preterm labor before 30 wk of human pregnancy. Many different species of organisms have been detected, leading to the suggestion that infection-induced preterm labor is a generic inflammatory response to organisms rather than a specific response to a limited number of pathogens. The detection of organisms by microbiological culture is a laborious and unreliable process, so the aim of this study was to harness modern molecular techniques to detect organisms in tissues from human pregnancy. A DNA probe specific for conserved regions of bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA sequence was designed and labeled with fluorescein for fluorescence in situ hybridization. Organisms were detected in the great majority (>80%) of fetal membranes after prolonged premature rupture of the fetal membranes and after preterm labor, which was consistent with previous data. Organisms were also detected in fetal membranes after preterm delivery without labor and in term deliveries (with or without labour). Inflammatory cells were found frequently in the amnion or chorion of preterm fetal membranes but not in term tissues. Our primary finding is that fluorescence in situ hybridization is an appropriate method to detect organisms in human fetal membranes. In addition, our data show that bacteria may be present in fetal membranes without necessarily causing an inflammatory response, so the mere presence of bacteria may not be sufficient to cause preterm labor.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1203/01.pdr.0000153869.96337.90

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fluorescence in-situ hybridisation with a DNA probe detected bacteria in the membranes of up to 70% of women undergoing elective caesarean section at term.

    “Fluorescence in-situ hybridisation with a DNA probe specific for conserved regions of bacterial DNA (the 16S ribosomal RNA) has detected bacteria in the membranes of up to 70% of women undergoing elective caesarean section at term.85”

    From Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth (2008) · cites this paper as [85]

  • The presence of bacteria in the chorioamnion alone cannot be sufficient to cause an inflammatory response, preterm labour, and preterm birth.

    “These findings suggest that the presence of bacteria in the chorioamnion alone cannot be sufficient to cause an inflammatory response, preterm labour, and preterm birth.85”

    From Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth (2008) · cites this paper as [85]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steel, J. H., Malatos, S., Kennea, N., Edwards, A. D., Miles, L., Duggan, P., Reynolds, P. R., Feldman, R. G., & Sullivan, M. H. F.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Sullivan, Mark H F
Venue
Pediatric Research
Published
2005-03
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
404-411
ISSN
  • 0031-3998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0447
OpenAlex
W2025568822
Cited by
317
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pediatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
preterm labor, fetal membranes, intrauterine infection, bacterial 16S rRNA, fluorescence in situ hybridization, bacterial detection, inflammatory cells, amniotic membrane, chorion, premature rupture of membranes, preterm birth, term pregnancy
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Female, Extraembryonic Membranes, Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture, Premature Rupture of Fetal Membranes, Gestational Age, Humans, Immune System, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Pregnancy, RNA, Bacterial, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Nucleic Acid Probes, Antigens, CD, In Situ Hybridization, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review