Cited by 164Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchPreterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisGestational Diabetes Research and Management

The oral microbiome and adverse pregnancy outcomes

Open access
Cobb, Charles, Kelly, Patricia, Williams, Karen, Babbar, Shilpa, Angolkar, Mubashir, Derman, Richard·2017·International Journal of Women's Health

Abstract

Abstract: Significant evidence supports an association between periodontal pathogenic bacteria and preterm birth and preeclampsia. The virulence properties assigned to specific oral pathogenic bacteria, for example, Fusobacterium nucleatum , Porphyromonas gingivalis , Filifactor alocis , Campylobacter rectus , and others, render them as potential collaborators in adverse outcomes of pregnancy. Several pathways have been suggested for this association: 1) hematogenous spread (bacteremia) of periodontal pathogens; 2) hematogenous spread of multiple mediators of inflammation that are generated by the host and/or fetal immune response to pathogenic bacteria; and 3) the possibility of oral microbial pathogen transmission, with subsequent colonization, in the vaginal microbiome resulting from sexual practices. As periodontal disease is, for the most part, preventable, the medical and dental public health communities can address intervention strategies to control oral inflammatory disease, lessen the systemic inflammatory burden, and ultimately reduce the potential for adverse pregnancy outcomes. This article reviews the oral, vaginal, and placental microbiomes, considers their potential impact on preterm labor, and the future research needed to confirm or refute this relationship. Keywords: periodontal disease, preterm labor, oral microbiome, vaginal microbiome, bacteria, pregnancy, infant, premature birth, low birth weight

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ijwh.s142730

Cites

162 of 162 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pathogenic bacteria from the oral cavity found at various sites within the uterus are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm delivery and preeclampsia.

    “Pathogenic bacteria from the oral cavity found at various sites within the uterus are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm delivery and preeclampsia.113, 114, 115”
  • Studies investigating the placental microbiome to understand its role in preterm pregnancies have identified bacteria associated with periodontal disease, suggesting a relationship between the oral and placental microbiomes.

    “Studies investigating the placental microbiome to understand its role in preterm pregnancies have identified bacteria associated with periodontal disease, suggesting a relationship between the oral and placental microbiomes.113, 114, 115, 116”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [128]Li Y Guo H Wang X Coinfection with Fusobacterium nucleatum can enhance the attachment and invasion of Porphyromonas gingivalis or Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans to human gingival epithelial cells Arch Oral Biol 2015 60 9 1387 1393 26143497

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cobb, C., Kelly, P., Williams, K., Babbar, S., Angolkar, M., & Derman, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
  • Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College (IN)
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Patricia
Venue
International Journal of Women's Health
Published
2017-08
Volume
Volume 9
Pages
551-559
ISSN
1179-1411 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2742755441
Cited by
164
References
162
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Women s Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Medicine Forum (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Keywords
oral microbiota, periodontal disease, preterm birth, preeclampsia, adverse pregnancy outcomes, vaginal microbiota, placental microbiome, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Filifactor alocis, Campylobacter rectus, bacteremia, systemic inflammation, low birth weight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review