Cited by 277Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Why Instructional Explanations Often Do Not Work: A Framework for Understanding the Effectiveness of Instructional Explanations

Wittwer, Jörg, Renkl, Alexander·2008·Educational Psychologist

Abstract

Although explanations are a common means of instruction, research shows that they often do not contribute to learning. To unravel the factors giving rise to the ineffectiveness of instructional explanations, we propose a framework that brings together empirical work on instructional explanations from a variety of research fields, including classroom instruction, tutoring, cooperative learning, cognitive skill acquisition, learning from texts, computer-supported learning, and multimedia learning. In our framework, we identify the distinctive characteristics of instructional explanations, present general guidelines for designing instructional explanations, and describe factors influencing both the generation and use of instructional explanations. It is argued that future research should uncover in more detail the interrelations between the different aspects of providing and using instructional explanations and their specific effects on learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00461520701756420

Cites

176 of 176 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wittwer, J., & Renkl, A.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Venue
Educational Psychologist
Published
2008-01-28
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
49-64
ISSN
  • 0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6985
OpenAlex
W2084299944
Cited by
277
References
176
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of California, Santa Cruz
  • Université Laval
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
instructional explanations, explanation design, learning from explanations, tutoring, cooperative learning, cognitive skill acquisition, learning from text, computer-supported learning, multimedia learning, classroom teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review