The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing for Multigroup Invariance Using AMOS Graphics: A Road Less Traveled
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to illustrate the steps involved in testing for multigroup invariance using Amos Graphics. Based on analysis of covariance (ANCOV) structures, 2 applications are demonstrated, each of which represents a different set of circumstances. Application 1 focuses on the equivalence of a measuring instrument and tests for its invariance across 3 teacher panels, given baseline models that are identical across groups. Application 2 centers on the equivalence of a postulated theoretical structure across adolescent boys and girls in light of baseline models that are differentially specified across groups. Taken together, these illustrated examples should be of substantial assistance to researchers interested in testing for multigroup invariance using the Amos program.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Simultaneous Factor Analysis in Several Populations
Jöreskog, K. G. (1971) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291366 · Cited by 2,051
Cited by
Development and validation of the job crafting scale
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2012) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.009 · Cited by 2,060
Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M., & Joseph, S. (2008) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.55.3.385 · Cited by 1,237
The development and initial validation of the cognitive fusion questionnaire
Gillanders, D. T., Bolderston, H., Bond, F. W., Dempster, M., Flaxman, P. E., Campbell, L., Kerr, S., Tansey, L., Noel, P., Ferenbach, C., et al. (2014) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2013.09.001 · Cited by 837
Increasingly certain about uncertainty: Intolerance of uncertainty across anxiety and depression
Carleton, R. N., Mulvogue, M. K., Thibodeau, M. A., McCabe, R. E., Antony, M. M., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2012) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.01.011 · Cited by 775
Kautish, P., Paul, J., & Sharma, R. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.389 · Cited by 476
Testing an integrated destination image model across residents and tourists
Stylidis, D., Shani, A., & Belhassen, Y. (2017) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2016.10.014 · Cited by 440
De Bruijn, G.-J., Kremers, S. P. J., De Vet, E., De Nooijer, J., Van Mechelen, W., & Brug, J. (2007) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/14768320601176113 · Cited by 182
Carleton, R. N., Collimore, K. C., McCabe, R. E., & Antony, M. M. (2011) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.04.002 · Cited by 177
Getting better with age: the relationship between age, acceptance, and negative affect
Shallcross, A. J., Ford, B. Q., Floerke, V. A., & Mauss, I. B. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031180 · Cited by 153
Frost, D. M., Fine, M., Torre, M. E., & Cabana, A. (2019) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/ajcp.12326 · Cited by 129
Lee, M., & Lee, H.-H. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106579 · Cited by 108
Is less more? Confirmatory factor analysis of the Attachment Style Questionnaires
Karantzas, G. C., Feeney, J. A., & Wilkinson, R. (2010) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407510373756 · Cited by 98
Parental catastrophizing about their child's chronic pain: are mothers and fathers different?
Hechler, T., Vervoort, T., Hamann, M., Tietze, A., Vocks, S., Goubert, L., Hermann, C., Wager, J., Blankenburg, M., Schroeder, S., et al. (2011) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.09.015 · Cited by 96
Kocovski, N. L., Fleming, J. E., Hawley, L. L., Ho, M.-H. R., & Antony, M. M. (2015) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2015.04.005 · Cited by 78
Santos, S., Crespo, C., Canavarro, M. C., & Kazak, A. E. (2015) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsv013 · Cited by 68
Techno-stressors, distress and strain: the roles of leadership and competitive climates
Turel, O., & Gaudioso, F. (2018) · Cognition, Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-018-0461-7 · Cited by 72
Measurement Invariance of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale Across Adult Attachment Style
Cordon, S. L., & Finney, S. J. (2008) · Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development · doi:10.1080/07481756.2008.11909817 · Cited by 71
Wollast, R., Aelenei, C., Chevalère, J., Van der Linden, N., Galand, B., Azzi, A., Frenay, M., & Klein, O. (2023) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2023.2172151 · Cited by 68
Pai, A. L. H., Mullins, L. L., Drotar, D., Burant, C., Wagner, J., & Chaney, J. M. (2006) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsl021 · Cited by 64
Fekih-Romdhane, F., Fawaz, M., Hallit, R., Sawma, T., Obeid, S., & Hallit, S. (2023) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-023-04937-z · Cited by 62
Manipulating user resistance to large-scale information systems through influence tactics
Ilie, V., & Turel, O. (2020) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2019.103178 · Cited by 52
Choosing an Endorser for a Women’s Sporting Event: The Interaction of Attractiveness and Expertise
Cunningham, G. B., Fink, J. S., & Kenix, L. J. (2008) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9340-z · Cited by 51
Assessing psychological flexibility: Validation of the Open and Engaged State Questionnaire
Benoy, C., Knitter, B., Knellwolf, L., Doering, S., Klotsche, J., & Gloster, A. T. (2019) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.08.005 · Cited by 48
Kristjansson, A. L., Sigfusdottir, I. D., Karlsson, T., & Allegrante, J. P. (2011) · Child Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s12187-010-9095-x · Cited by 25
Song, Y., Malhotra, S., Broekhuizen, M., Wang, Y., Chen, B.-B., & Dubas, J. S. (2021) · The Journal of Genetic Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221325.2021.1891857 · Cited by 20
Retreating to safety: testing the social risk hypothesis model of depression
Dunn, J. C., Whelton, W. J., & Sharpe, D. (2012) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.06.002 · Cited by 17
Mason, M. C., Zamparo, G., Saleem, S., & Umar, R. M. (2025) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-12-2023-6441 · Cited by 14
Lam, A. H. Y., Cheung, Y. T. D., Wong, K. H., Leung, S. F., & Chien, W. T. (2022) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s338133 · Cited by 13
“Alternative models were compared to test the model’s robustness and the hypothesised interpretation of the direction of the identified paths.62 Goodness of fit was assessed using the standard fit indices of chi square (χ2), CFI, TLI, SRMR and RMSEA.63,64 The chi-square/dfratio should be less than 5 when the sample siz…”
MethodInfluentialPanno, A., Pellegrini, V., De Cristofaro, V., & Donati, M. A. (2023) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12338 · Cited by 11
Tilikidou, I., & Delistavrou, A. (2023) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs13060518 · Cited by 6
Tiringer, I., Simon, A., Németh, K., Bánki, C., Molnár, E., Szamosi, E., Thaly, E., Kerekes, Z., Mangel, L., & Veress, G. (2011) · Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle · doi:10.1556/mpszle.66.2011.4.4 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Byrne, B. M.
- Venue
- Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 272-300
- ISSN
- 1070-5511 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-8007
- OpenAlex
- W2024370570
- Cited by
- 1,045
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
