Cited by 223Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsCircadian rhythm and melatonin

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 376 of the 379 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Motivations and Methods for Analyzing Pulsatile Hormone Secretion

Open access

Abstract

Endocrine glands communicate with remote target cells via a mixture of continuous and intermittent signal exchange. Continuous signaling allows slowly varying control, whereas intermittency permits large rapid adjustments. The control systems that mediate such homeostatic corrections operate in a species-, gender-, age-, and context-selective fashion. Significant progress has been made in understanding mechanisms of adaptive interglandular signaling in vivo. Principal goals are to understand the physiological origins, significance, and mechanisms of pulsatile hormone secretion. Key analytical issues are: 1) to quantify the number, size, shape, and uniformity of pulses, nonpulsatile (basal) secretion, and elimination kinetics; 2) to evaluate regulation of the axis as a whole; and 3) to reconstruct dose-response interactions without disrupting hormone connections. This review will focus on the motivations driving and the methodologies used for such analyses.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/er.2008-0005

Cites

376 of 376 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 379 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Wu, 1996, Patterns of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion from childhood to adulthood in the human male: a study using deconvolution analysis and an ultrasensitive immunofluorometric assay., J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 81, 1798
  2. Akaike, 1976, An information criterion (AIC)., Math Sci, 14, 5

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Veldhuis, J. D., Keenan, D. M., & Pincus, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Independent Statistician (S.M.P.), Guilford, Connecticut 06437
Venue
Endocrine Reviews
Published
2008-12-01
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
823-864
ISSN
  • 0163-769X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7189
OpenAlex
W2098329444
Cited by
223
References
379
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Endocrine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R21AG023777, AG-23133, R21 AG 29215, AG-29362, R01AG029362, R01AG023133, R01 NIA AG019695, AG23777, R01AG019695, R21AG029215, R37AG019695)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK73148, R01DK073148)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01-RR00 585, M01RR000585)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
pulsatile hormone secretion, pulse analysis, basal secretion, elimination kinetics, dose-response interaction, homeostatic regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Endocrine Glands, Hormones, Humans, Pulsatile Flow, Secretory Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review