Cited by 161Hormonal and reproductive studiesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

Level of sex hormone-binding globulin is positively correlated with insulin sensitivity in men with type 2 diabetes

Birkeland, K I, Hanssen, K F, Torjesen, P A, Vaaler, S·1993·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

The level of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) is associated with glucose metabolism in nondiabetic women and men, and the finding of low SHBG levels is suggested to be a predictor of the development of type 2 (noninsulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. To further assess the relationship between SHBG levels and glucose metabolism, we measured serum concentrations of sex hormones and SHBG in 23 well characterized diabetic men, and studied the relationship between these variables and parameters of glucose and lipid metabolism. Insulin sensitivity was estimated using the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic glucose clamp technique. There was a strong positive correlation between the level of SHBG and the sensitivity to insulin in these individuals (r = 0.74; P < 0.001), which was independent of obesity and abdominal fat accumulation. Controlling for the effect of fasting C-peptide and insulin levels did not change the correlation coefficient significantly. SHBG levels did not correlate with levels of free testosterone (F-T), free estradiol (F-E2), or F-T/F-E2 ratio. F-E2 was positively correlated with levels of diastolic blood pressure and triglycerides (r = 0.44; P < 0.05 and r = 0.62; P < 0.001, respectively). These findings support earlier observations that associate insulin resistance with levels of SHBG, and for the first time demonstrate a direct correlation between sensitivity to insulin and SHBG levels in men with type 2 diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jcem.76.2.8432768

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Birkeland, K. I., Hanssen, K. F., Torjesen, P. A., & Vaaler, S.
Affiliations
Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
1993-02
Volume
76
Issue
2
Pages
275-278
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2155219543
Cited by
161
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
sex hormone-binding globulin, insulin sensitivity, type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance, glucose metabolism, free estradiol, free testosterone, sex hormones, triglycerides, diastolic blood pressure, men
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Aged, Body Composition, C-Peptide, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Estradiol, Humans, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Testosterone, Glucose Clamp Technique, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review