Cited by 220Regulation of Appetite and ObesityAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Weekly Subcutaneous Pegylated Recombinant Native Human Leptin (PEG-OB) Administration in Obese Men

Open access
Hukshorn, Chris J., Saris, Wim H. M., Westerterp-Plantenga, Margriet S., Farid, Adrienne R., Smith, Francoise J., Campfield, L. Arthur·2000·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

To assess the biological activity and tolerability of pegylated recombinant native human leptin (PEG-OB), 30 obese men (mean body mass index, 33.9 kg/m2) were randomized to a double-blind treatment with weekly sc injections of 20 mg PEG-OB or placebo for 12 weeks, in addition to a hypocaloric diet (deficit, 2 MJ/day). Body composition, energy expenditure, and metabolic parameters were measured before and after treatment. PEG-OB was generally well tolerated based on adverse event reports, lab values, and vital signs. Weekly sc PEG-OB led to sustained serum concentrations of PEG-OB and leptin throughout treatment. No significant differences in the delta or percent weight loss, percent body fat, sleeping metabolic rate, or respiratory quotient were observed between the PEG-OB and placebo groups. Percent change in serum triglycerides from baseline was significantly correlated with body weight loss in the PEG-OB group, but not in the placebo group. Although larger reductions in serum triglycerides were observed in the PEG-OB group compared with the placebo group, these differences were not statistically significant. We concluded that weekly injection of PEG-OB leads to sustained serum concentration of PEG-OB and leptin throughout the 12-week treatment period and is generally well tolerated. The trends observed in serum triglycerides suggest that a weekly 20-mg sc treatment with PEG-OB may have biological effects in obese men.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jcem.85.11.6955

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent relatively small, randomized, double-blind clinical trial demonstrated that administration of high, pharmacologic doses of pegylated r-metHuLeptin in addition to a hypocaloric diet produced significant suppression of appetite as measured by eating/hunger questionnaires.

    “a recent relatively small, randomized, double-blind clinical trial demonstrated that administration of high, pharmacologic doses of pegylated r-metHuLeptin in addition to a hypocaloric diet produced significant suppression of appetite as measured by eating/hunger questionnaires (54)”

    From The role of falling leptin levels in the neuroendocrine and metabolic adaptation to short-term starvation in healthy men (2003) · cites this paper as [54]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Leptin therapy alone has failed to induce significant weight loss or insulin sensitization.

    “Indeed, leptin therapy alone has failed to induce significant weight loss or insulin sensitization 149, 150.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hukshorn, C. J., Saris, W. H. M., Westerterp-Plantenga, M. S., Farid, A. R., Smith, F. J., & Campfield, L. A.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Colorado State University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2000-11
Volume
85
Issue
11
Pages
4003-4009
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2057919982
Cited by
220
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche
  • Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
leptin therapy, obesity, subcutaneous injection, weight loss, hypocaloric diet, serum triglycerides, body composition, energy expenditure, respiratory quotient, drug tolerability, obese men
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Body Composition, Double-Blind Method, Energy Metabolism, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Placebos, Recombinant Proteins, Safety, Time Factors, Triglycerides, Leptin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review