Cited by 282Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Apolipoprotein E ε4 allele, AD pathology, and the clinical expression of Alzheimer’s disease

Bennett, D.A., Wilson, R.S., Schneider, J.A., Evans, D.A., Aggarwal, N.T., Arnold, S.E., Cochran, E.J., Berry-Kravis, E., Bienias, J.L.·2003·Neurology

Abstract

Objective To test the hypothesis that the APOE epsilon4 allele is associated with the clinical manifestations of AD through an association with the pathologic hallmarks of disease. Methods Participants were older Catholic nuns, priests, and brothers who agreed to annual neurologic and neuropsychological evaluation for AD and other common neurologic conditions and brain autopsy at the time of death. There were 77 persons without dementia and 51 with probable AD; 38 participants had one or more epsilon4 alleles. Results In logistic regression analyses, controlling for age, sex, and education, the epsilon4 allele was strongly associated with the likelihood of clinical AD (odds = 3.46, 95% CI = 1.44 to 8.33). However, controlling for the effect of AD pathology, the association of the epsilon allele with clinical AD was reduced by >50% and was no longer significant (odds = 1.58, 95% CI = 0.56 to 4.43). Similarly, in linear regression analyses, controlling for age, sex, and education, the epsilon4 allele was strongly associated with level of cognitive function proximate to death (regression coefficient = -0.477, p = 0.005). However, after controlling for the effect of AD pathology, the association of the epsilon4 allele with level of cognition was reduced by >80% and was no longer significant (regression coefficient = -0.093). Similar results were found in analyses using separate measures of neuritic plaques, diffuse plaques, and neurofibrillary tangles, and in analyses of five dif…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000042478.08543.f7

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Craik F. A functional account of age differences in memory. In: Klix Hagendorf H eds. Human memory and cognitive capabilities: mechanisms and performances. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV 1986:409–422.
  2. Benton AL Sivan AB Hamsher K Varney NR Spreen O. Contributions to neuropsychological assessment 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press 1994.
  3. Raven JC Court JH Raven J. Standard progressive matrices. Raven manual section 3. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press 1992.
  4. Rosenthal R Rosnow RL. Essentials of behavioral research: methods and data analysis 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill 1991.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 282

Metadata

Authors
Bennett, D. A., Wilson, R. S., Schneider, J. A., Evans, D. A., Aggarwal, N. T., Arnold, S. E., Cochran, E. J., Berry-Kravis, E., & Bienias, J. L.
Affiliations
From the Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center and Rush Institute for Healthy Aging (Drs. Bennett, Wilson, Schneider, Evans, Aggarwal, and Bienias); Department of Neurological Sciences (Drs. Bennett, Wilson, Schneider, Evans, Aggarwal, Cochran, and Berry-Kravis); Department of Psychology (Dr. Wilson); Department of Pathology (Drs. Schneider and Cochran); Department of Internal Medicine (Drs. Evans and Bienias), Department of Pediatrics (Dr. Berry-Kravis), Rush Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center,...
Venue
Neurology
Published
2003-01-28
Volume
60
Issue
2
Pages
246-252
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2005578478
Cited by
282
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
FWCI
12.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG-15819, AG 10161, P30AG010161)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
APOE ε4, Alzheimer's disease, neuropathology, neuritic plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, cognitive function, episodic memory, semantic memory, working memory, perceptual speed, visuospatial ability, women religious, brain autopsy
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Brain, Cognition Disorders, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Memory Disorders, Neuropsychological Tests, Risk Factors, Linear Models, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Disease Progression, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review