Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 380

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Part X. Neuropathology Confirmation of the Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease

Gearing, M., Mirra, S. S., Hedreen, J. C., Sumi, S. M., Hansen, L. A., Heyman, A.·1995·Neurology

Abstract

This report summarizes the neuropathologic findings in the first 106 autopsies of CERAD (Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease) dementia patients diagnosed clinically as having Alzheimer's disease (AD). In 92 (87%) of the 106 cases, neuropathologists confirmed Alzheimer's disease (AD) as the primary dementing illness. Coexistent Parkinson's disease (PD) changes were present in 19 (21%) and vascular lesions of varying nature and size in 26 (28%) of these 92 AD cases. The 14 cases in which AD was not interpreted as the primary dementing illness can be divided into four major subgroups based on their neuropathology findings: PD and related pathology (n = 5), hippocampal sclerosis (n = 3), miscellaneous neurodegenerative and other disorders (n = 3), and no significant changes (n = 3). Despite the relatively high level of clinical diagnostic accuracy, further refinement of assessment batteries may facilitate distinction of non-AD dementias from AD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.45.3.461

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gearing, M., Mirra, S. S., Hedreen, J. C., Sumi, S. M., Hansen, L. A., & Heyman, A.
Venue
Neurology
Published
1995-03
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
461-466
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2151197773
Cited by
380
References
7
FWCI
18.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.