The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction
Abstract
This paper reports on a technique for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Starting with the literature and using the critical incident interview technique, 39 factors affecting satisfaction were identified. Adapting the semantic differential scaling technique, a questionnaire for measuring satisfaction was then created. Finally, the instrument was pilot tested to prove its validity and reliability. The results of this effort and suggested uses of the questionnaire are reported here.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement
Swanson, E. B. (1974) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.21.2.178 · Cited by 529
Cited by
The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update
(2003) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 · Cited by 11,791
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249689 · Cited by 6,006
Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers
Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099 · Cited by 4,672
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance
Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0042 · Cited by 2,835
Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379202900303 · Cited by 1,901
AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment
Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B. K., & Wang, R. Y. (2002) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(02)00043-5 · Cited by 1,611
Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis
Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96 · Cited by 1,611
Factors affecting trust in market research relationships
Moorman, C., Deshpandé, R., & Zaltman, G. (1993) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299305700106 · Cited by 3,659
Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model
Roca, J. C., Chiu, C.-M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003 · Cited by 1,399
Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004 · Cited by 1,350
Informational influence in organizations: An integrated approach to knowledge adoption
Sussman, S. W., & Siegal, W. S. (2003) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.14.1.47.14767 · Cited by 1,250
Erkan, I., & Evans, C. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.003 · Cited by 1,188
Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources
Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W. W. (2001) · ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/506724.506730 · Cited by 1,099
Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Gawankar, S. A. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.05.022 · Cited by 1,015
NELSON, R. R., TODD, P. A., & WIXOM, B. H. (2005) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2005.11045823 · Cited by 998
Filieri, R. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.006 · Cited by 1,083
Identifying key factors affecting consumer purchase behavior in an online shopping context
Park, C., & Kim, Y. (2003) · International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management · doi:10.1108/09590550310457818 · Cited by 914
Antecedents of supply chain visibility in retail supply chains: A resource‐based theory perspective
Barratt, M., & Oke, A. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.003 · Cited by 702
Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants
Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A., & Chowa, C. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0583 · Cited by 685
Perceived information quality in data exchanges: Effects on risk, trust, and intention to use
Nicolaou, A. I., & McKnight, D. H. (2006) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0103 · Cited by 682
Al-Gahtani, S. S., & King, M. (1999) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/014492999119020 · Cited by 519
Data Quality in Internet of Things: A state-of-the-art survey
Karkouch, A., Mousannif, H., Al Moatassime, H., & Noel, T. (2016) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2016.08.002 · Cited by 378
Kim, T. G., Lee, J. H., & Law, R. (2008) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.016 · Cited by 369
Ganguli, S., & Roy, S. K. (2011) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/02652321111107648 · Cited by 357
eWOM source credibility, perceived risk and food product customer’s information adoption
Hussain, S., Ahmed, W., Jafar, R. M. S., Rabnawaz, A., & Jianzhou, Y. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.034 · Cited by 337
Raghunathan, S. (1999) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/s0167-9236(99)00060-3 · Cited by 222
Wu, J.-H., & Wang, Y.-M. (2007) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.07.005 · Cited by 203
Understanding consumers internet purchase intention in Malaysia
(2011) · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT · doi:10.5897/ajbm10.1266 · Cited by 139
Social interaction and continuance intention in online auctions: A social capital perspective
Wang, J.-C., & Chiang, M.-J. (2009) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2009.04.013 · Cited by 133
Data science in education: big data and learning analytics.
Klašnja‐Milićević, A., Ivanović, M., & Budimac, Z. (2017) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.21844 · Cited by 121
Najmul Islam, A. K. M. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.010 · Cited by 107
(2012) · Cited by 100
Kao, T.-W. (., & Lin, W. T. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.006 · Cited by 87
Perceived system performance: a test of an extended technology acceptance model
Liu, L., & Ma, Q. (2006) · ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/1161345.1161354 · Cited by 80
Evaluating an mHealth App for Health and Well-Being at Work: Mixed-Method Qualitative Study
de Korte, E. M., Wiezer, N., Janssen, J. H., Vink, P., & Kraaij, W. (2018) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.6335 · Cited by 54
Ubiquitous learning: Determinants impacting learners’ satisfaction and performance with smartphones
Jung, H.-J. (2014) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44386 · Cited by 62
The impact of service level on the acceptance of application service oriented medical records
Liu, L., & Ma, Q. (2005) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.12.004 · Cited by 59
The impact of user‐perceived e‐procurement quality on system and contract compliance
Brandon‐Jones, A., & Carey, S. (2011) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443571111111928 · Cited by 58
Identifying issues in customer relationship management at merck-medco
Torkzadeh, G., Chang, J. C.-J., & Hansen, G. W. (2006) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.10.003 · Cited by 56
Jin, X.-L., Chen, X., & Zhou, Z. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102428 · Cited by 54
Influence of social software features on the reuse of Business Intelligence reports
Alpar, P., Engler, T. H., & Schulz, M. (2015) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2015.01.004 · Cited by 36
Understanding Data Quality in a Data-Driven Industry Context: Insights from the Fundamentals
Fu, Q., Nicholson, G. L., & Easton, J. M. (2024) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2024.100729 · Cited by 17
Upadhyay, P., & Dan, P. K. (2009) · Communications in Computer and Information Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00405-6_22 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1983-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 530-545
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2096878712
- Cited by
- 2,542
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 76.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
