Cited by 354Primate Behavior and EcologyChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentFace Recognition and Perception

Neonatal imitation in Rhesus Macaques

Open access
Ferrari, Pier F, Visalberghi, Elisabetta, Paukner, Annika, Fogassi, Leonardo, Ruggiero, Angela, Suomi, Stephen J·2006·PLoS Biology

Abstract

The emergence of social behaviors early in life is likely crucial for the development of mother-infant relationships. Some of these behaviors, such as the capacity of neonates to imitate adult facial movements, were previously thought to be limited to humans and perhaps the ape lineage. Here we report the behavioral responses of infant rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) to the following human facial and hand gestures: lip smacking, tongue protrusion, mouth opening, hand opening, and opening and closing of eyes (control condition). In the third day of life, infant macaques imitate lip smacking and tongue protrusion. On the first day of life, the model's mouth openings elicited a similar matched behavior (lip smacking) in the infants. These imitative responses are present at an early stage of development, but they are apparently confined to a narrow temporal window. Because lip smacking is a core gesture in face-to-face interactions in macaques, neonatal imitation may serve to tune infants' affiliative responses to the social world. Our findings provide a quantitative description of neonatal imitation in a nonhuman primate species and suggest that these imitative capacities, contrary to what was previously thought, are not unique to the ape and human lineage. We suggest that their evolutionary origins may be traced to affiliative gestures with communicative functions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040302

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rhesus macaques display basic aspects of complex social behaviors typically considered uniquely human, including social imitation, prosocial behaviors, and understanding others' perceptions.

    “Critically, rhesus macaques display basic aspects of complex social behaviors that are typically considered ‘uniquely human’ (Frith and Frith, 2007; Saxe, 2006). These include social imitation (Ferrari et al., 2006; Subiaul, 2004), prosocial behaviors (Chang et al., 2011; Masserman et al., 1964), as well as understanding others’ perceptions (Flombaum and Santos, 2005; Santos et al., 2006).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Anisfeld M 1991 Neonatal imitation: Review Developmental Rev 11 60 97
  2. Kugiumutzakis G 1999 Genesis and development of early infant mimesis to facial and vodal models Nadel J Butterworth G Imitation in infancy Cambridge Cambridge University Press 36 59

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferrari, P. F., Visalberghi, E., Paukner, A., Fogassi, L., Ruggiero, A., & Suomi, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Parma (IT)
  • National Research Council (IT)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Ferrari, Pier F
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2006-09-05
Volume
4
Issue
9
Pages
e302
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2132307087
Cited by
354
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 20
FWCI
35.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • NHLBI Division of Intramural Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
neonatal imitation, rhesus monkeys, facial gestures, tongue protrusion, mother-infant relationship, affiliative behavior, social behavior development
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Behavior, Animal, Facial Expression, Female, Imitative Behavior, Macaca mulatta, Male, Maternal Behavior, Mouth, Nonverbal Communication, Social Behavior, Time Factors, Tongue

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review