Cited by 89Action Observation and SynchronizationPrimate Behavior and EcologyMotor Control and Adaptation

Evolution of mirror systems: a simple mechanism for complex cognitive functions

Open access
Bonini, Luca, Ferrari, Pier Francesco·2011·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Mirror neurons (MNs) were first discovered in monkeys and subsequently in humans and birds. While MNs are deemed to play a number of high‐level cognitive functions, here we propose that they serve a unitary form of sensorimotor recognition of others’ behavior. We caution that this basic function should not be confounded with the higher order functions that stem from the wider cortical systems in which MNs are embedded. Depending on the species, MNs function at different levels of motor event recognition, from motor goals to fine grained movements, thus contributing to social learning and imitative phenomena. Recent studies show that MNs coding has a prospective nature, suggesting that MNs also play a role in anticipating and predicting the behavior of others during social interactions. The presence of mirroring mechanisms in subcortical structures related to visceromotor reactions and the large diffusion of imitative phenomena among animals suggest that MN systems may be more ancient and widespread than previously thought.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06002.x

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a shared hypothalamic cell population that is sensitive to both watching and performing retrieval, reminiscent of mirror or 'social' cells in other brain structures.

    “Thus, there is a shared hypothalamic cell population that is sensitive to both watching and performing retrieval, reminiscent of mirror or ‘social’ cells in other brain structures19,20.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonini, L., & Ferrari, P. F.
Affiliations
University of Parma (IT)
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04
Volume
1225
Issue
1
Pages
166-175
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2010118636
Cited by
89
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01HD064653)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
mirror neurons, mirror system, imitation, social learning, social cognition, prediction of others' behavior, animal imitation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cognition, Biological Evolution, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Interpersonal Relations, Models, Biological, Motor Activity, Nerve Net, Phylogeny

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review