Cited by 294Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsBiofield Effects and BiophysicsStress Responses and Cortisol

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 106 of the 106 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effects of Mind-Body Therapies on the Immune System: Meta-Analysis

Open access

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Psychological and health-restorative benefits of mind-body therapies have been investigated, but their impact on the immune system remain less defined. OBJECTIVE: To conduct the first comprehensive review of available controlled trial evidence to evaluate the effects of mind-body therapies on the immune system, focusing on markers of inflammation and anti-viral related immune responses. METHODS: Data sources included MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and PsycINFO through September 1, 2013. Randomized controlled trials published in English evaluating at least four weeks of Tai Chi, Qi Gong, meditation, or Yoga that reported immune outcome measures were selected. Studies were synthesized separately by inflammatory (n = 18), anti-viral related immunity (n = 7), and enumerative (n = 14) outcomes measures. We performed random-effects meta-analyses using standardized mean difference when appropriate. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies published in 39 articles (total 2, 219 participants) met inclusion criteria. For inflammatory measures, after 7 to 16 weeks of mind-body intervention, there was a moderate effect on reduction of C-reactive protein (effect size [ES], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 1.12), a small but not statistically significant reduction of interleukin-6 (ES, 0.35; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.75), and negligible effect on tumor necrosis factor-α (ES, 0.21; 95% CI, -0.15 to 0.58). For anti-viral related immune and enumerative measures, there were negligible effects on CD4 counts (ES, 0.15; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.34) and natural killer cell counts (ES, 0.12, 95% CI -0.21 to 0.45). Some evidence indicated mind-body therapies increase immune responses to vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Mind-body therapies reduce markers of inflammation and influence virus-specific immune responses to vaccination despite minimal evidence suggesting effects on resting anti-viral or enumerative measures. These immunomodulatory effects, albeit incomplete, warrant further methodologically rigorous studies to determine the clinical implications of these findings for inflammatory and infectious disease outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0100903

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Literature Search and Study Selection. Legends: CD4 = cluster of differentiation 4 protein; CRP = c-reactive protein; IL-6 = interleukin-6; INF-γ = Interferon-gamma; NK count = natural killer cell count; TNF-α = Tumor necrosis factor. aThe studies were conducted in 9 countries (United States, China, India, Australia, Spain, Germany, Iran, Norway, and the United Kingdom). bThe sum of study number exceeds the total number of studies included due to some studies reported multiple outcomes across categories.
Figure 1 Literature Search and Study Selection. Legends: CD4 = cluster of differentiation 4 protein; CRP = c-reactive protein; IL-6 = interleukin-6; INF-γ = Interferon-gamma; NK count = natural killer cell count; TNF-α = Tumor necrosis factor. aThe studies were conducted in 9 countries (United States, China, India, Australia, Spain, Germany, Iran, Norway, and the United Kingdom). bThe sum of study number exceeds the total number of studies included due to some studies reported multiple outcomes across categories.CC0 · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Meta-analysis of RCTs comparing the effect of mind-body therapies with control interventions on inflammatory markers: CRP (panel a), IL-6 (panel b), and TNF-α (panel c). Legends: CRP = c-reactive protein; IL-6 = interleukin 6; Med = meditation; QG = Qi Gong; TC = Tai Chi; TNF-α = Tumor necrosis factor; Tx = treatment; RA = rheumatoid arthritis; SMD = standardized mean difference. Risk of bias: L = low; M = medium; H = high (see Table S2 for details). Zautra 2008 reported only subgroup results (grp 1 = RA patients with depression; grp 2 = RA patients without depression) and data from each subgroup were entered in the meta-analysis separately. P-values adjacent to I-squared results are p-values for heterogeneity testing (P<0.05 indicates significant heterogeneity), and p-values adjacent to meta-analysis pooled results (diamonds) are p-values for the pooled effect sizes.
Figure 2 Meta-analysis of RCTs comparing the effect of mind-body therapies with control interventions on inflammatory markers: CRP (panel a), IL-6 (panel b), and TNF-α (panel c). Legends: CRP = c-reactive protein; IL-6 = interleukin 6; Med = meditation; QG = Qi Gong; TC = Tai Chi; TNF-α = Tumor necrosis factor; Tx = treatment; RA = rheumatoid arthritis; SMD = standardized mean difference. Risk of bias: L = low; M = medium; H = high (see Table S2 for details). Zautra 2008 reported only subgroup results (grp 1 = RA patients with depression; grp 2 = RA patients without depression) and data from each subgroup were entered in the meta-analysis separately. P-values adjacent to I-squared results are p-values for heterogeneity testing (P<0.05 indicates significant heterogeneity), and p-values adjacent to meta-analysis pooled results (diamonds) are p-values for the pooled effect sizes.CC0 · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Subgroup meta-analysis of RCTs comparing the effect of mind-body therapies with control interventions on CRP and IL-6 by clinical populations (panels a and b), by MBT types (panels c and d), and by control types (panels e and f). Legends: SMD = standardized mean difference. MBT = mind-body therapies. P-values adjacent to I-squared results are p-values for heterogeneity testing (P<0.05 indicates significant heterogeneity and “I-squared = n/a” indicates that there was only 1 study in the subgroup so heterogeneity was not applicable), and p-values adjacent to meta-analysis pooled results (diamonds) are p-values for the pooled effect sizes.
Figure 3 Subgroup meta-analysis of RCTs comparing the effect of mind-body therapies with control interventions on CRP and IL-6 by clinical populations (panels a and b), by MBT types (panels c and d), and by control types (panels e and f). Legends: SMD = standardized mean difference. MBT = mind-body therapies. P-values adjacent to I-squared results are p-values for heterogeneity testing (P<0.05 indicates significant heterogeneity and “I-squared = n/a” indicates that there was only 1 study in the subgroup so heterogeneity was not applicable), and p-values adjacent to meta-analysis pooled results (diamonds) are p-values for the pooled effect sizes.CC0 · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Meta-analysis of RCTs comparing the effect of mind-body therapies with control interventions on enumerative markers: CD4 count (panel a) and NK count (panel b). Legends: CD4 = cluster of differentiation 4 protein; Med = meditation; NK count = natural killer cell count; Tx = treatment; SMD = standardized mean.
Figure 4 Meta-analysis of RCTs comparing the effect of mind-body therapies with control interventions on enumerative markers: CD4 count (panel a) and NK count (panel b). Legends: CD4 = cluster of differentiation 4 protein; Med = meditation; NK count = natural killer cell count; Tx = treatment; SMD = standardized mean.CC0 · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Morgan, N., Irwin, M. R., Chung, M., & Wang, C.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Chenchen
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-07-02
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
e100903
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971901983
Cited by
294
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 3
FWCI
20.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000124, CTSI UL1TR000124, AG028748)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG026364, R01AG034588, P30AG028748)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL095799)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA032922)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA160245, R01CA119159)
  • National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT006367, K24AT007323, R01AT005521)
  • Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of California, Los Angeles (UL1TR000124)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Biofield Effects and Biophysics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
mind-body interventions, immune system, inflammation, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, TNF-α, antiviral immunity, CD4 count, natural killer cells, Tai Chi, qigong, meditation, yoga, vaccine response, immunomodulation
MeSH terms
C-Reactive Protein, Humans, Inflammation, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Virus Diseases, Interleukin-6, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, MEDLINE, CD4 Lymphocyte Count, Tai Ji

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review