Cited by 173Sperm and Testicular FunctionGut microbiota and healthHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

The Gut Microbiota and Developmental Programming of the Testis in Mice

Open access
Al-Asmakh, Maha, Stukenborg, Jan-Bernd, Reda, Ahmed, Anuar, Farhana, Strand, Mona-Lisa, Hedin, Lars, Pettersson, Sven, Söder, Olle·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Nutrients and environmental chemicals, including endocrine disruptors, have been incriminated in the current increase in male reproductive dysfunction, but the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. The gastrointestinal tract represents the largest surface area exposed to our environment and thereby plays a key role in connection with exposure of internal organs to exogenous factors. In this context the gut microbiome (all bacteria and their metabolites) have been shown to be important contributors to body physiology including metabolism, cognitive functions and immunity. Pivotal to male reproduction is a proper development of the testis, including the formation of the blood-testis barrier (BTB) that encapsulates and protects germ cells from stress induced environmental cues, e.g. pathogenic organisms and xenobiotics. Here we used specific pathogen free (SPF) mice and germ-free (GF) mice to explore whether gut microbiota and/or their metabolites can influence testis development and regulation of BTB. Lumen formation in the seminiferous tubules, which coincides with the development of the BTB was delayed in the testes of GF mice at 16 days postpartum. In addition, perfusion experiments (Evans blue) demonstrated increased BTB permeability in these same mice. Reduced expressions of occludin, ZO-2 and E-cadherin in GF testis suggested that the microbiota modulated BTB permeability by regulation of cell-cell adhesion. Interestingly, exposure of GF mice to Clostridium Tyrobutyricum (CBUT), which secrete high levels of butyrate, restored the integrity of the BTB and normalized the levels of cell adhesion proteins. Moreover, the GF mice exhibited lower serum levels of gonadotropins (LH and FSH) than the SPF group. In addition, the intratesticular content of testosterone was lower in GF compared to SPF or CBUT animals. Thus, the gut microbiome can modulate the permeability of the BTB and might play a role in the regulation of endocrine functions of the testis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0103809

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In mice, the microbiota can regulate testicular development and function, and androgen deficiency substantially alters the microbiome.

    “In mice, the microbiota can regulate testicular development and function [251], while androgen deficiency has substantially altered the microbiome [252].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Asmakh, M., Stukenborg, J.-B., Reda, A., Anuar, F., Strand, M.-L., Hedin, L., Pettersson, S., & Söder, O.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Sidra Medical and Research Center (QA)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
Söder, Olle
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-08-13
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
e103809
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112346304
Cited by
173
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research
  • Qatar University
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Barncancerfonden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
gut microbiota, testicular development, blood-testis barrier, germ-free mice, butyrate, cell-cell adhesion, occludin, ZO-2, E-cadherin, gonadotropins, testosterone, male reproductive disorders, endocrine disruptors, postpartum period
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood-Testis Barrier, Cell Adhesion, Fertility, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred Strains, Permeability, Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms, Testis, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review