Cited by 107Gut microbiota and healthProbiotics and Fermented FoodsInfant Nutrition and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fecal Microbiota in Healthy Subjects Following Omnivore, Vegetarian and Vegan Diets: Culturable Populations and rRNA DGGE Profiling

Open access

Abstract

In this study, the fecal microbiota of 153 healthy volunteers, recruited from four different locations in Italy, has been studied by coupling viable counts, on different microbiological media, with ribosomal RNA Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (rRNA-DGGE). The volunteers followed three different diets, namely omnivore, ovo-lacto-vegetarian and vegan. The results obtained from culture-dependent and -independent methods have underlined a high level of similarity of the viable fecal microbiota for the three investigated diets. The rRNA DGGE profiles were very complex and comprised a total number of bands that varied from 67 to 64 for the V3 and V9 regions of the 16S rRNA gene, respectively. Only a few bands were specific in/of all three diets, and the presence of common taxa associated with the dietary habits was found. As far as the viable counts are concerned, the high similarity of the fecal microbiota was once again confirmed, with only a few of the investigated groups showing significant differences. Interestingly, the samples grouped differently, according to the recruitment site, thus highlighting a higher impact of the food consumed by the volunteers in the specific geographical locations than that of the type of diet. Lastly, it should be mentioned that the fecal microbiota DGGE profiles obtained from the DNA were clearly separated from those produced using RNA, thus underlining a difference between the total and viable populations in the fecal samples.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0128669

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig 1 Distribution of the viable counts of the three diets according to the different culture media. Box plot interpretation: the central line indicates the median, upper and lower box lines of the first and third quartiles (Q1 and Q3), respectively, and the bars at the end of the whiskers represent the distribution extremities, while the dots indicate outliers. Plot A, all the media considered together; Plot B, GSP medium at 25°C; Plot C, Chromocult Coliform Agar at 37°C; Plot D, Bifidumbacterium Agar at 37°C; Plot E, MRS at 25°C; Plot F, MRS at 37°C; Plot G, Wilkins-Chalgren Anaerobe Agar + GN Supplement; Plot H, Bacteroides Bile Esculine Agar. For specifications on the counted microbial groups, reference can be made to Table 1.
Fig 1 Distribution of the viable counts of the three diets according to the different culture media. Box plot interpretation: the central line indicates the median, upper and lower box lines of the first and third quartiles (Q1 and Q3), respectively, and the bars at the end of the whiskers represent the distribution extremities, while the dots indicate outliers. Plot A, all the media considered together; Plot B, GSP medium at 25°C; Plot C, Chromocult Coliform Agar at 37°C; Plot D, Bifidumbacterium Agar at 37°C; Plot E, MRS at 25°C; Plot F, MRS at 37°C; Plot G, Wilkins-Chalgren Anaerobe Agar + GN Supplement; Plot H, Bacteroides Bile Esculine Agar. For specifications on the counted microbial groups, reference can be made to Table 1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 2 PLS-DA models based on the similarity distance matrix of DGGE built as a function of the nucleic acids. Data from DNA (blue) and RNA (yellow).
Fig 2 PLS-DA models based on the similarity distance matrix of DGGE built as a function of the nucleic acids. Data from DNA (blue) and RNA (yellow).CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 3 PLS-DA models based on the RNA-DGGE similarity distance matrix as a function of the diet. Data from omnivore (red), ovo-lacto-vegetarian (green) and vegan (blue) individuals.
Fig 3 PLS-DA models based on the RNA-DGGE similarity distance matrix as a function of the diet. Data from omnivore (red), ovo-lacto-vegetarian (green) and vegan (blue) individuals.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 4 PLS-DA models based on the RNA-DGGE similarity distance matrix as a function of the geographical site. The plot is color coded as a function of the city: Bari (silver), Bologna (gold), Parma (blue), Torino (maroon).
Fig 4 PLS-DA models based on the RNA-DGGE similarity distance matrix as a function of the geographical site. The plot is color coded as a function of the city: Bari (silver), Bologna (gold), Parma (blue), Torino (maroon).CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 5 PLS-DA models based on the RNA-DGGE similarity distance matrix from each diet group using the geographical site as the discriminating factor. Plot A, omnivore individuals; Plot B, ovo-lacto-vegetarian individuals; Plot C, vegan individuals. The samples are color coded according to the geographical site (Bari: silver; Bologna: gold; Parma: blue; Torino: maroon).
Fig 5 PLS-DA models based on the RNA-DGGE similarity distance matrix from each diet group using the geographical site as the discriminating factor. Plot A, omnivore individuals; Plot B, ovo-lacto-vegetarian individuals; Plot C, vegan individuals. The samples are color coded according to the geographical site (Bari: silver; Bologna: gold; Parma: blue; Torino: maroon).CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 6 RNA-DGGE band distribution. Plot A and Plot B, Venn diagrams of the unique and overlapping bands present in the RNA-DGGE profile of the omnivore (red), ovo-lacto-vegetarian (green) and vegan (blue) individuals for the V3 and V9 regions, respectively; Plot C, RNA-DGGE fingerprints of the V3 amplicons, where the letters indicate the dietary groups: the omnivore (O), ovo-lacto-vegetarian (VG) and vegan (V) band identifications are reported in Table 2; Plot D, RNA-DGGE fingerprints of the V9 amplicons; the band identifications are reported in Table 3.
Fig 6 RNA-DGGE band distribution. Plot A and Plot B, Venn diagrams of the unique and overlapping bands present in the RNA-DGGE profile of the omnivore (red), ovo-lacto-vegetarian (green) and vegan (blue) individuals for the V3 and V9 regions, respectively; Plot C, RNA-DGGE fingerprints of the V3 amplicons, where the letters indicate the dietary groups: the omnivore (O), ovo-lacto-vegetarian (VG) and vegan (V) band identifications are reported in Table 2; Plot D, RNA-DGGE fingerprints of the V9 amplicons; the band identifications are reported in Table 3.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. L Vauterin, 1992, Computer-aided objective comparison of electrophoresis patterns for grouping and identification of microorganisms, Eur. J. Clin.Microbiol, 37

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 107

Metadata

Authors
Ferrocino, I., Di Cagno, R., De Angelis, M., Turroni, S., Vannini, L., Bancalari, E., Rantsiou, K., Cardinali, G., Neviani, E., & Cocolin, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • University of Parma (IT)
  • University of Perugia (IT)
Corresponding author
Cocolin, Luca
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-06-02
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
e0128669
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W563597376
Cited by
107
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 6
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (PRIN 2010-2011 “, 2010-2011, (PRIN 2010))
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
fecal microbiota, diet, omnivorous diet, vegetarian diet, vegan diet, 16S rRNA gene, viable cell count, culturable microorganisms, regional variation
MeSH terms
Diet, Vegan, Adolescent, Adult, Diet, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Diet, Vegetarian, Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review