Cited by 343Gut microbiota and healthInfant Nutrition and HealthClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research

Distal gut microbiota of adolescent children is different from that of adults: Gut microbiota of adolescents differs from that of adults

Open access
Agans, Richard, Rigsbee, Laura, Kenche, Harshavardhan, Michail, Sonia, Khamis, Harry J., Paliy, Oleg·2011·FEMS Microbiology Ecology

Abstract

Human intestinal microbiota plays a number of important roles in human health and is also implicated in several gastrointestinal disorders. Although the diversity of human gut microbiota in adults and in young children has been examined, few reports of microbiota composition are available for adolescents. In this work, we used Microbiota Array for high-throughput analysis of distal gut microbiota in adolescent children 11-18 years of age. Samples obtained from healthy adults were used for comparison. Adolescent and adult groups could be separated in the principal components analysis space based on the relative species abundance of their distal gut microbiota. All samples were dominated by class Clostridia. A core microbiome of 46 species that were detected in all examined samples was established; members of genera Ruminococcus, Faecalibacterium, and Roseburia were well represented among core species. Comparison of intestinal microbiota composition between adolescents and adults revealed a statistically significantly higher abundance of genera Bifidobacterium and Clostridium among adolescent samples. The number of detected species was similar between sample groups, indicating that it was the relative abundances of the genera and not the presence or absence of a specific genus that differentiated adolescent and adult samples. In summary, contrary to the current belief, this study suggests that the gut microbiome of adolescent children is different from that of adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01120.x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The gut microbiota may undergo a more prolonged development than previously suspected, continuing past early childhood.

    “The gut microbiota, however, may undergo a more prolonged development than previously suspected, with other evidence to indicate that it continues to develop past early childhood [82,83].”
  • At genus level, adolescents had higher relative abundances of Bifidobacterium and Clostridium, but lower relative abundances of Prevotella and Sutterella.

    “At the genus level, adolescents had higher relative abundances of Bifidobacterium and Clostridium, but lower relative abundances of Prevotella and Sutterella.”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Agans et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agans, R., Rigsbee, L., Kenche, H., Michail, S., Khamis, H. J., & Paliy, O.
Affiliations
Wright State University (US)
Corresponding author
Paliy, Oleg
Venue
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
Published
2011-06-01
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
404-412
ISSN
0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1921871707
Cited by
343
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • FEMS Microbiology Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Journal of Bioresource Management (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R21AT003423, AT003423)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD065575, R03HD065575)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Keywords
gut microbiota, adolescents, age differences, core microbiome, Clostridia, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, Ruminococcus, Faecalibacterium, Roseburia, species abundance, healthy adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Bacteria, Child, DNA, Bacterial, Female, Humans, Intestines, Male, Middle Aged, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Genome, Bacterial, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Principal Component Analysis, Metagenome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review