Cited by 214Physical Activity and HealthDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Neurocognitive aging and cardiovascular fitness: recent findings and future directions

Colcombe, Stan J., Kramer, Arthur F., McAuley, Edward, Erickson, Kirk I., Scalf, Paige·2004·Journal of Molecular Neuroscience

Abstract

In the first century, ce, the Roman satirist Juneval famously observed Orandum est, ut sit mens sana in corpore sano, or "A sound mind in a sound body is something to be prayed for." This implicit link between mental and physical health, also paralleled by Eastern philosophies and practices such as tai chi, has survived the millennia since Juneval and his contemporaries. More recently, controlled examinations of the effects of physical fitness on cognitive performance have shown that improving cardiovascular fitness (CVF) can help to reduce the deleterious effects of age on cognition and brain structure. Thus, as we age, it may well be the case that a sound mind is a natural concomitant of a sound body. Numerous cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have examined the effects of aerobic exercise on cognitive performance in aging humans since earlier studies, which found that physically fit older adults performed better on simple cognitive tasks than their less-fit counterparts. This base of knowledge recently has been furthered through examinations of cortical structure (Colcombe et al., 2003) and neurocognitive function in aging humans via functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging techniques. In this manuscript, we will briefly review some of our recent research on the effects of CVF on brain function, structure, and behavior in older adults. We will then outline some of our current and future directions in this area.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1385/jmn:24:1:009

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colcombe, S. J., Kramer, A. F., McAuley, E., Erickson, K. I., & Scalf, P.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Kramer, Arthur F.
Venue
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
Published
2004
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
009-014
ISSN
0895-8696 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100316611
Cited by
214
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG-18008, R01AG018008, R37AG025667)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
neurocognitive aging, cardiorespiratory fitness, aerobic exercise, older adults, cognitive performance, brain structure, cortical structure, mind-body problem, physical fitness and cognition
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory Disorders, Neuronal Plasticity, Physical Fitness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review