Cited by 148Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural MechanismsStress Responses and Cortisol

Reduced amygdalar and hippocampal size in adults with generalized social phobia

Open access
Irle, Eva, Ruhleder, Mirjana, Lange, Claudia, Seidler-Brandler, Ulrich, Salzer, Simone, Dechent, Peter, Weniger, Godehard, Leibing, Eric +1 more·2010·Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Structural and functional brain imaging studies suggest abnormalities of the amygdala and hippocampus in posttraumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder. However, structural brain imaging studies in social phobia are lacking. METHODS: In total, 24 patients with generalized social phobia (GSP) and 24 healthy controls underwent 3-dimensional structural magnetic resonance imaging of the amygdala and hippocampus and a clinical investigation. RESULTS: Compared with controls, GSP patients had significantly reduced amygdalar (13%) and hippocampal (8%) size. The reduction in the size of the amygdala was statistically significant for men but not women. Smaller right-sided hippocampal volumes of GSP patients were significantly related to stronger disorder severity. LIMITATIONS: Our sample included only patients with the generalized subtype of social phobia. Because we excluded patients with comorbid depression, our sample may not be representative. CONCLUSION: We report for the first time volumetric results in patients with GSP. Future assessment of these patients will clarify whether these changes are reversed after successful treatment and whether they predict treatment response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1503/jpn.090041

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The neural systems implicated in anxiety by rodent studies are consistent with those identified in human patients.

    “This contrast notwithstanding, the neural systems implicated in anxiety by rodent studies are consistent with those identified in human patients26-34, underscoring the utility and translatability of these rodent studies.”

    From Resolving the neural circuits of anxiety (2015) · cites this paper as [30]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Brown TA, di Nardo P, Barlow DH. Anxiety disorders interview schedule adult version. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 1994.
  2. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, et al. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, research version, patient edition. (SCID-I/P) New York (NY): Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute; 2002.
  3. Liebowitz MR. Social phobia. Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry 1987; 22:141-73.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Irle, E., Ruhleder, M., Lange, C., Seidler-Brandler, U., Salzer, S., Dechent, P., Weniger, G., Leibing, E., & Leichsenring, F.
Affiliations
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
Venue
Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
Published
2010-03
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
126-131
ISSN
1180-4882 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031889293
Cited by
148
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
FWCI
11.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01GV0607)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
generalized social phobia, amygdala volume, hippocampal volume, structural brain abnormalities, sex differences, disorder severity, right hippocampus, treatment response prediction
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Brain, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Organ Size, Personality Disorders, Phobic Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Characteristics, Comorbidity, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review