Cited by 881Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaTraumatic Brain Injury Research

A meta-analysis of structural brain abnormalities in PTSD

KARL, A, SCHAEFER, M, MALTA, L, DORFEL, D, ROHLEDER, N, WERNER, A·2006·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

This series of meta-analyses examined structural abnormalities of the hippocampus and other brain regions in persons with PTSD compared to trauma-exposed and non-exposed control groups. The findings were significantly smaller hippocampal volumes in persons with PTSD compared to controls with and without trauma exposure, but group differences were moderated by MRI methodology, PTSD severity, medication, age and gender. Trauma-exposed persons without PTSD also showed significantly smaller bilateral hippocampal compared to non-exposed controls. Meta-analyses also found significantly smaller left amygdala volumes in adults with PTSD compared to both healthy and trauma-exposed controls, and significantly smaller anterior cingulate cortex compared to trauma-exposed controls. Pediatric samples with PTSD exhibited significantly smaller corpus callosum and frontal lobe volumes compared to controls, but there were no group differences in hippocampal volume. The overall findings suggested a dimensional, developmental psychopathology systems model in which: (1) hippocampal volumetric differences covary with PTSD severity; (2) hippocampal volumetric differences do not become apparent until adulthood; and (3) PTSD is associated with abnormalities in multiple frontal-limbic system structures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.03.004

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KARL, A., SCHAEFER, M., MALTA, L., DORFEL, D., ROHLEDER, N., & WERNER, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE)
Corresponding author
  • KARL, A
  • WERNER, A
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006
Volume
30
Issue
7
Pages
1004-1031
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994547251
Cited by
881
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 47
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, structural brain abnormalities, hippocampal volume, amygdala volume, anterior cingulate cortex, corpus callosum, frontal lobe volume, trauma exposure, PTSD symptom severity, developmental psychopathology, pediatric PTSD
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Brain, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review