Cited by 122Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyHistory, Medicine, and Leadership

Narcissistic Personality Disorder in DSM-V—In Support of Retaining a Significant Diagnosis

Ronningstam, Elsa·2011·Journal of Personality Disorders

Abstract

Narcissistic personality disorder, NPD, has been excluded as a diagnostic category and independent personality disorder type in the Personality and Personality Disorder Work Group's recent proposal for DSM-5 Personality and Personality Disorders. The aim of this paper is to present supporting evidence in favor of keeping NPD as a personality type with a set of separate diagnostic criteria in DSM-5. These include: the prevalence rate, extensive clinical and empirical reports and facts, its psychiatric, social and societal significance especially when associated to functional vocational and interpersonal impairment, social and moral adaptation, and acute suicidality. Proposals for a clinically relevant and empirically based definition of narcissism, a description of the narcissistic personality disorder type, and a set of diagnostic criteria for NPD are outlined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.2.248

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most narcissistic patients present with some degree of fluctuation between grandiose and vulnerable self-esteem states.

    “There is however growing consensus, that most narcissistic patients present with some degree of fluctuation between grandiose and vulnerable self-esteem states [23, 35, 66, 35, 73].”
  • Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism may reflect both sides of a narcissistic 'coin' that may be regularly oscillating, inter-related and state dependent.

    “While the differences in presentation between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism appear manifest, it has been argued that they reflect both sides of a narcissistic ‘coin’ [9] that may be regularly oscillating, inter-related and state dependent [6, 18–22].”

    From Living with pathological narcissism: a qualitative study (2020) · cites this paper as [18]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ronningstam, E.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Ronningstam, Elsa
Venue
Journal of Personality Disorders
Published
2011-04
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
248-259
ISSN
0885-579X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108349403
Cited by
122
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 18
FWCI
16.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › History, Medicine, and Leadership
Keywords
narcissistic personality disorder, DSM-5, personality disorder classification, diagnostic criteria, prevalence, functional disability, suicidality
MeSH terms
Humans, Narcissism, Personality, Personality Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review