Cited by 108Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

A psychometric investigation of the suicide status form II with a psychiatric inpatient sample

Conrad, Amy K., Jacoby, Aaron M., Jobes, David A., Lineberry, Timothy W., Shea, Catherine E., Arnold Ewing, Theresa D., Schmid, Phyllis J., Ellenbecker, Susan M. +5 more·2009·Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

Abstract

We investigated the psychometric validity and reliability of the Suicide Status Form-II (SSF-II) developed by Jobes, Jacoby, Cimbolic, and Hustead (1997). Participants were 149 psychiatric inpatients (108 suicidal; 41 nonsuicidal) at the Mayo Clinic. Each participant completed assessment measures within 24 hours of admission and 48-72 hours later. Factor analyses of the SSF core assessment produced a robust two-factor solution reflecting chronic and acute response styles. The SSF core assessment had good to excellent convergent and criterion validity; pre-post SSF ratings also demonstrated moderate test-retest reliability. The results replicated previous research and show that the SSF-II is psychometrically sound with a high-risk suicidal inpatient sample.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/suli.2009.39.3.307

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conrad, A. K., Jacoby, A. M., Jobes, D. A., Lineberry, T. W., Shea, C. E., Arnold Ewing, T. D., Schmid, P. J., Ellenbecker, S. M., Lee, J. L., Fritsche, K., Grenell, J. A., Gehin, J. M., & Kung, S.
Affiliations
  • Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (US)
  • VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (US)
  • Catholic University of America (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-06
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
307-320
ISSN
  • 0363-0234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-278X
OpenAlex
W2033209995
Cited by
108
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
suicide risk assessment, psychiatric inpatients, psychometric validity, reliability statistics, factor structure, convergent validity, test-retest reliability, suicidal ideation
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Admission, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, Reproducibility of Results, Risk Assessment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review