Cited by 606Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

Structural covariance in the human cortex

Open access
Mechelli, Andrea, Friston, Karl J., Frackowiak, Richard S., Price, Cathy J.·2005·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The morphology of the human cortex varies remarkably across individuals, regardless of overall brain size. It is currently unclear whether related cortical regions covary in gray matter density, as a result of mutually trophic influences or common experience-related plasticity. We acquired a structural magnetic resonance imaging scan from 172 subjects and extracted the regional gray matter densities from 12 readily identifiable regions of interest involved in sensorimotor or higher-order cognitive functions. We then used these values to predict regional densities in the remaining areas of the cortex, using voxel-based morphometry. This revealed patterns of positive and negative covariance that provide insight into the topographical organization of multiple cortical regions. We report that the gray matter density of a region is a good predictor of the density of the homotopic region in the contralateral hemisphere, with the striking exception of primary visual cortex. Whereas some regions express patterns of regional covariance that are mirror symmetrical relative to the interhemispheric fissure, other regions express asymmetric patterns of regional covariance. Finally, patterns of covariance are remarkably consistent between males and females, with the exception of the left amygdala, which is positively associated with the left and right anterior inferior temporal cortex in males and with the right angular gyrus in females. Our study establishes that the density of different cortical regions is coordinated within an individual. The coordinated variations we report are likely to be determined by both genetic and environmental factors and may be the basis for differences in individual behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0357-05.2005

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Correlation patterns showed high correlations between contralateral homologous regions and neighboring ipsilateral regions.

    “High correlations were observed between contralateral homologous regions and neighboring ipsilateral regions”

    From Developmental Changes in Organization of Structural Brain Networks (2013) · cites this paper as Mechelli et al. 2005

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Burda H, Burns V, Muller M (1990) Sensory adaptations in subterrean mammals. In: Evolution of subterrean mammals at the organismal and molecular levels (Nevo E, Reig OA, eds), pp 269 -293. New York: Wiley.
  2. Purves, D, White LE, Zheng D, Andrews TJ, Riddle DR (1996) Brain size, behavior and the allocation of neural space. In: Individual development over the lifespan: biological and psychosocial perspectives (Magnusson D, ed), pp 162-178. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mechelli, A., Friston, K. J., Frackowiak, R. S., & Price, C. J.
Affiliations
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2005-09-07
Volume
25
Issue
36
Pages
8303-8310
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2011484875
Cited by
606
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 31
FWCI
8.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (051067)
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
structural covariance, gray matter density, human cortex, contralateral hemisphere, primary visual cortex, sex differences, amygdala, angular gyrus, inferior temporal cortex, voxel-based morphometry
MeSH terms
Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Periaqueductal Gray

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review