Cited by 1,138Face Recognition and PerceptionMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fear and the human amygdala

Open access
Adolphs, R, Tranel, D, Damasio, H, Damasio, AR·1995·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

We have previously reported that bilateral amygdala damage in humans compromises the recognition of fear in facial expressions while leaving intact recognition of face identity (Adolphs et al., 1994). The present study aims at examining questions motivated by this finding. We addressed the possibility that unilateral amygdala damage might be sufficient to impair recognition of emotional expressions. We also obtained further data on our subject with bilateral amygdala damage, in order to elucidate possible mechanisms that could account for the impaired recognition of expressions of fear. The results show that bilateral, but not unilateral, damage to the human amygdala impairs the processing of fearful facial expressions. This impairment appears to result from an insensitivity to the intensity of fear expressed by faces. We also confirmed a double dissociation between the recognition of facial expressions of fear, and the recognition of identity of a face: these two processes can be impaired independently, lending support to the idea that they are subserved in part by anatomically separate neural systems. Based on our data, and on what is known about the amygdala's connectivity, we propose that the amygdala is required to link visual representations of facial expressions, on the one hand, with representations that constitute the concept of fear, on the other. Preliminary data suggest the amygdala's role extends to both recognition and recall of fearful facial expressions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.15-09-05879.1995

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–130 of 130

Metadata

Authors
Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1995-09-01
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
5879-5891
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2116372303
Cited by
1,138
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 65
FWCI
15.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Life Sciences Research Foundation
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-19632)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
amygdala, fear recognition, facial expressions, face identification, double dissociation, amygdala connectivity, concept of fear
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Art, Brain Damage, Chronic, Brain Diseases, Emotions, Face, Facial Expression, Fear, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review