Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The GTPase Arl8B Plays a Principle Role in the Positioning of Interstitial Axon Branches by Spatially Controlling Autophagosome and Lysosome Location

Adnan, Gee, Rubikaite, Aine, Khan, Moqadisa, Reber, Michael, Suetterlin, Philip, Hindges, Robert, Drescher, Uwe·2020·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Interstitial axon branching is an essential step during the establishment of neuronal connectivity. However, the exact mechanisms on how the number and position of branches are determined are still not fully understood. Here, we investigated the role of Arl8B, an adaptor molecule between lysosomes and kinesins. In chick retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), downregulation of Arl8B reduces axon branch density and shifts their location more proximally, while Arl8B overexpression leads to increased density and more distal positions of branches. These alterations correlate with changes in the location and density of lysosomes and autophagosomes along the axon shaft. Diminishing autophagy directly by knock-down of atg7, a key autophagy gene, reduces branch density, while induction of autophagy by rapamycin increases axon branching, indicating that autophagy plays a prominent role in axon branch formation.In vivo, local inactivation of autophagy in the retina using a mouse conditional knock-out approach disturbs retino-collicular map formation which is dependent on the formation of interstitial axon branches. These data suggest that Arl8B plays a principal role in the positioning of axon branches by spatially controlling autophagy, thus directly controlling formation of neural connectivity in the brain. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The formation of interstitial axonal branches plays a prominent role in numerous places of the developing brain during neural circuit establishment. We show here that the GTPase Arl8B controls density and location of interstitial axon branches, and at the same time controls also density and location of the autophagy machinery. Upregulation or downregulation of autophagy in vitro promotes or inhibits axon branching. Local disruption of autophagy in vivo disturbs retino-collicular mapping. Our data suggest that Arl8B controls axon branching by controlling locally autophagy. This work is one of the first reports showing a role of autophagy during early neural circuit development and suggests that autophagy in general plays a much more prominent role during brain development than previously anticipated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1759-19.2020

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More recent work shows compelling evidence for an important physiological function of lysosomes or related LAMP1+ organelles in the axon.

    “more recent work shows compelling evidence for an important physiological function of lysosomes or related LAMP1 + -organelles in the axon (Adnan et al., 2020;Bonifacino and Neefjes, 2017;Cason et al., 2022;Cheng et al., 2018;De Pace et al., 2020;Farfel-Becker et al., 2019;Farias et al., 2015;Farias et al., 2017a;Roney et al., 2022;Winckler et al., 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. 10.1038/nn735 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.03.221 · DOI
  3. 10.1128/MCB.00627-13 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.mcn.2016.01.001 · DOI
  5. 10.1242/jcs.123075 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2018.12.011 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.02.034 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.ceb.2017.01.008 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.08.001 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.051 · DOI
  11. 10.1083/jcb.201412046 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.009 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.027 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.030 · DOI
  15. 10.1371/journal.pone.0206743 · DOI
  16. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.150029 · DOI
  17. 10.7554/eLife.31659 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.021 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/nrm3117 · DOI
  20. 10.7554/eLife.14810 · DOI
  21. 10.1073/pnas.1616363114 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.conb.2018.02.020 · DOI
  24. 10.1083/jcb.201703061 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.12.001 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/dneu.20852 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.006 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.06.009 · DOI
  29. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123209 · DOI
  30. 10.1083/jcb.201807165 · DOI
  31. 10.3390/cells6040037 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.200 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00799-7 · DOI
  34. 10.1242/jcs.02958 · DOI
  35. 10.1083/jcb.121.2.305 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.070 · DOI
  37. 10.1074/jbc.M110.118976 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1038/nrn3650 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/dneu.22294 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/21592799.2015.1086501 · DOI
  41. 10.1242/jcs.162651 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.033 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/nature04723 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1038/ncb2204 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6412-10.2011 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/s41467-018-07416-2 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1915-08.2008 · DOI
  49. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1910-13.2014 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00295-1 · DOI
  51. 10.1083/jcb.201607085 · DOI
  52. 10.1002/dneu.22317 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.11.006 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0223-06.2006 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/s41598-018-29421-7 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.043 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.013 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.02.011 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1242/jcs.196287 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1083/jcb.201703094 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.10.007 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Rosa-Ferreira C , Sweeney ST , Munro S (2018) The small G protein Arl8 contributes to lysosomal function and long-range axonal transport in Drosophila . Biol Open 7:bio035964. · DOI
  64. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0069-06.2006 · DOI
  65. 10.1007/s11033-008-9339-8 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.023 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.10.015 · DOI
  68. 10.1091/mbc.E13-05-0259 · DOI
  69. 10.1002/syn.890030312 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.004 · DOI
  71. 10.1080/15548627.2017.1386820 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.07.010 · DOI
  73. 10.1101/cshperspect.a006734 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.07.016 · DOI
  75. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.04.035 · DOI
  76. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-21-08548.2001 · DOI
  77. 10.4161/auto.3602 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Adnan, G., Rubikaite, A., Khan, M., Reber, M., Suetterlin, P., Hindges, R., & Drescher, U.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2020-09-11
Volume
40
Issue
42
Pages
8103-8118
ISSN
  • 0270-6474
  • 1529-2401
Cited by
17
References
7
Language
en
Funders
  • Royal Society (IE150445)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (E015522/1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review