Cited by 222Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

When the Sense of Smell Meets Emotion: Anxiety-State-Dependent Olfactory Processing and Neural Circuitry Adaptation

Open access
Krusemark, Elizabeth A., Novak, Lucas R., Gitelman, Darren R., Li, Wen·2013·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Phylogenetically the most ancient sense, olfaction is characterized by a unique intimacy with the emotion system. However, mechanisms underlying olfaction–emotion interaction remain unclear, especially in an ever-changing environment and dynamic internal milieu. Perturbing the internal state with anxiety induction in human subjects, we interrogated emotion-state-dependent olfactory processing in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study. Following anxiety induction, initially neutral odors become unpleasant and take longer to detect, accompanied by augmented response to these odors in the olfactory (anterior piriform and orbitofrontal) cortices and emotion-relevant pregenual anterior cingulate cortex. In parallel, the olfactory sensory relay adapts with increased anxiety, incorporating amygdala as an integral step via strengthened (afferent or efferent) connections between amygdala and all levels of the olfactory cortical hierarchy. This anxiety-state-dependent neural circuitry thus enables cumulative infusion of limbic affective information throughout the olfactory sensory progression, thereby driving affectively charged olfactory perception. These findings could constitute an olfactory etiology model of emotional disorders, as exaggerated emotion–olfaction interaction in negative mood states turns innocuous odors aversive, fueling anxiety and depression with rising ambient sensory stress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1835-13.2013

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krusemark, E. A., Novak, L. R., Gitelman, D. R., & Li, W.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-09-25
Volume
33
Issue
39
Pages
15324-15332
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2048207916
Cited by
222
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 3
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH093413, T32MH018931)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD03352., P30HD003352)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
anxiety, olfaction, odor detection, piriform cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, emotional disorders, depression
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adolescent, Adult, Amygdala, Anxiety, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Male, Nerve Net, Odorants, Smell, Olfactory Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review