Cited by 537Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

A developmental change in NMDA receptor-associated proteins at hippocampal synapses

Open access
Sans, Nathalie, Petralia, Ronald S., Wang, Ya-Xian, Blahos, Jaroslav, Hell, Johannes W., Wenthold, Robert J.·2000·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The membrane-associated guanylate kinases [Chapsyn-110/postsynaptic density-93 (PSD-93), synapse-associated protein-90 (SAP-90)/PSD-95, and SAP-102] are believed to cluster and anchor NMDA receptors at the synapse and to play a role in signal transduction. We have investigated the developmental changes in expression of these proteins in rat hippocampus using biochemical analyses and quantitative immunogold electron microscopy. At postnatal day 2 (P2), SAP-102 was highly expressed, whereas PSD-93 and PSD-95 were low. SAP-102 expression increased during the first week, stayed stable through P35, and showed a reduced expression at 6 months. From P2 through 6 months, PSD-93 and PSD-95 increased. For PSD-95, the percent of labeled synapses increased almost threefold with age, whereas the number of gold particles per labeled synapse did not change significantly, suggesting that the increase in PSD-95 is attributable primarily to an increase in the number of synapses containing PSD-95. In contrast, for SAP-102, both percent labeled synapses and the number of gold particles per labeled synapse decreased during this time. From Western blots of hippocampus and immunogold analysis of CA1 synapses, the high expression of NR2B at P2 coincides with the high level of SAP-102 at synapses, whereas the later expression of NR2A coincides with that of PSD-93 and PSD-95. To determine whether the changes in PSD-93/95 and SAP-102 reflect preferred associations with NR2A and NR2B, respectively, we measured co-immunoprecipitation in the adult hippocampus. These studies suggest that there is a preference for complexes of NR2A/PSD-93/95 and NR2B/SAP-102. These results indicate that individual receptor-associated proteins may have specific functions that are critical to synapse development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.20-03-01260.2000

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PSD95 and NR1 rise due to the robust synaptogenesis that occurs during this time.

    “which rise due to the robust synaptogenesis that occurs during this time (Sans et al., 2000).”

    From The E3 ubiquitin ligase IDOL regulates synaptic ApoER2 levels and is important for plasticity and learning (2017) · cites this paper as Sans et al., 2000

    The Results section (‘Development of PSD-95/SAP-102 proteins at the synapse’; page unavailable) reports that synaptic PSD-95 increases during development. The Discussion attributes this mainly to more synapses containing PSD-95, not to demonstrated synaptogenesis; it treats formation of new synapses as an alternative explanation. The cited passages do not establish a developmental rise in NR1. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Vaughn JE (1989) Review: fine structure of synaptogenesis in the ver- tebrate central nervous system. Synapse 3:255-285.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sans, N., Petralia, R. S., Wang, Y.-X., Blahos, J., Hell, J. W., & Wenthold, R. J.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2000-02-01
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
1260-1271
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1648575050
Cited by
537
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 27
FWCI
7.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS035563, NS 35563)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
NMDA receptor, synaptic development, hippocampus, PSD-95, PSD-93, NR2A, NR2B, synaptic proteins, postsynaptic density, CA1 synapses, postnatal development
MeSH terms
Disks Large Homolog 4 Protein, Aging, Animals, Cell Line, Hippocampus, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Membrane Proteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neuropeptides, Nuclear Proteins, Nucleoside-Phosphate Kinase, Synapses, Transcription Factors, Blotting, Western, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, AMPA, Protein Isoforms, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Rats, Guanylate Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review