The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cortical Regions Involved in Perceiving Object Shape
Open accessAbstract
The studies described here use functional magnetic resonance imaging to test whether common or distinct cognitive and/or neural mechanisms are involved in extracting object structure from the different image cues defining an object's shape, such as contours, shading, and monocular depth cues. We found overlapping activations in the lateral and ventral occipital cortex [known as the lateral occipital complex (LOC)] for objects defined by different visual cues (e.g., grayscale photographs and line drawings) when each was compared with its own scrambled-object control. In a second experiment we found a reduced response when objects were repeated, independent of whether they appeared in the same or a different format (i.e., grayscale images vs line drawings). A third experiment showed that activation in the LOC was no stronger for three-dimensional shapes defined by contours or monocular depth cues, such as occlusion, than for two-dimensional shapes, suggesting that these regions are not selectively involved in processing three-dimensional shape information. These results suggest that common regions in the LOC are involved in extracting and/or representing information about object structure from different image cues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Neural Mechanism for Working and Recognition Memory in Inferior Temporal Cortex
Miller, E. K., Li, L., & Desimone, R. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1962197 · Cited by 706
Cited by
Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects
Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006 · Cited by 2,256
A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body
Downing, P. E., Jiang, Y., Shuman, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1063414 · Cited by 2,043
Self-citationCichy, R. M., Khosla, A., Pantazis, D., Torralba, A., & Oliva, A. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep27755 · Cited by 716
Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events
Ranganath, C., & Rainer, G. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1052 · Cited by 779
Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans
Orban, G. A., Van Essen, D., & Vanduffel, W. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.009 · Cited by 639
Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway
Amedi, A., Malach, R., Hendler, T., Peled, S., & Zohary, E. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/85201 · Cited by 630
Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas
Culham, J. C., Danckert, S. L., Souza, J. F. X. D., Gati, J. S., Menon, R. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2003) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1591-5 · Cited by 637
Neural decoding of visual imagery during sleep
Horikawa, T., Tamaki, M., Miyawaki, Y., & Kamitani, Y. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1234330 · Cited by 498
Shape perception reduces activity in human primary visual cortex
Murray, S. O., Kersten, D., Olshausen, B. A., Schrater, P., & Woods, D. L. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.192579399 · Cited by 496
Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain
Grafton, S. T., & de C. Hamilton, A. F. (2007) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2007.05.009 · Cited by 503
Visual dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease
Weil, R. S., Schrag, A. E., Warren, J. D., Crutch, S. J., Lees, A. J., & Morris, H. R. (2016) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aww175 · Cited by 481
“In the healthy brain, object processing occurs in V2, V4 and the lateral occipital complex, especially in the right hemisphere (Grill-Spector et al., 1999; Kourtzi and Kanwisher, 2000; Large et al., 2007).”
BackgroundThe topography of high-order human object areas
Malach, R., Levy, I., & Hasson, U. (2002) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01870-3 · Cited by 459
Human temporal-lobe response to vocal sounds
Belin, P., Zatorre, R. J., & Ahad, P. (2002) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(01)00084-2 · Cited by 452
Observing others: multiple action representation in the frontal lobe.
Nelissen, K., Luppino, G., Vanduffel, W., Rizzolatti, G., & Orban, G. A. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1115593 · Cited by 352
Reber, P. J. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.019 · Cited by 296
Disentangling visual imagery and perception of real-world objects
Lee, S.-H., Kravitz, D. J., & Baker, C. I. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.055 · Cited by 263
The Infancy of the Human Brain
Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Spelke, E. S. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.026 · Cited by 264
fMRI Repetition Suppression: Neuronal Adaptation or Stimulus Expectation?
Larsson, J., & Smith, A. T. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr119 · Cited by 264
Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2013) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00381 · Cited by 172
Measuring neural representations with fMRI: practices and pitfalls
Davis, T., & Poldrack, R. A. (2013) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12156 · Cited by 132
Repetition suppression for spoken sentences and the effect of task demands
Hasson, U., Nusbaum, H. C., & Small, S. L. (2006) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.12.2013 · Cited by 61
Stimulus repetition probability effects on repetition suppression are position invariant for faces
Kovács, G., Iffland, L., Vidnyánszky, Z., & Greenlee, M. W. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.038 · Cited by 61
De Baene, W., Kühn, S., & Brass, M. (2012) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21234 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2000-05-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3310-3318
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2131354767
- Cited by
- 673
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
