Cited by 459Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

The topography of high-order human object areas

Malach, Rafael, Levy, Ifat, Hasson, Uri·2002·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Cortical topography is one of the most fundamental organizing principles of cortical areas. One such topography - eccentricity mapping - is present even in high-order, ventral stream visual areas. Within these areas, different object categories have specific eccentricity biases. In particular, faces, letters and words appear to be associated with central visual-field bias, whereas buildings are associated with a peripheral one. We propose that resolution needs are an important factor in organizing object representations: objects whose recognition depends on analysis of fine detail will be associated with central-biased representations, whereas objects whose recognition entails large-scale integration will be more peripherally biased.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01870-3

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sensitivity to increasingly larger visual units varies along a posterior-to-anterior gradient, whereas sensitivity to increasingly eccentric sectors of the retina varies along a lateral-to-mesial gradient.

    “Sensitivity to increasingly larger visual units varies along a posterior-toanterior gradient, whereas sensitivity to increasingly eccentric sectors of the retina varies along a lateral-tomesialgradient.”
  • Regions that show particular responsivity to objects, faces, or houses occupy reproducible locations within those gradients, corresponding to the differential requirements that they put on peripheral or foveal vision.

    “Strikingly, the regions that show particular responsivity to objects, faces, or houses occupy reproducible locations within those gradients, corresponding to the differential requirements that they put on peripheral or foveal vision [43].”
  • Two gradients of selectivity that cut across all areas of the ventral visual system have been identified.

    “Two gradients of selectivity that cut across all areas of the ventral visual system have been identified [43].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malach, R., Levy, I., & Hasson, U.
Affiliations
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Malach, Rafael
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-04
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
176-184
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022251150
Cited by
459
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
James S. McDonnell Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
cortical topography, ventral stream, object recognition, face perception, visual word recognition, building recognition, visual resolution, object representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review