The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Protective Autoimmunity Is a Physiological Response to CNS Trauma
Open accessAbstract
Primary damage caused by injury to the CNS is often followed by delayed degeneration of initially spared neurons. Studies in our laboratory have shown that active or passive immunization with CNS myelin-associated self-antigens can reduce this secondary loss. Here we show, using four experimental paradigms in rodents, that CNS trauma spontaneously evokes a beneficial T cell-dependent immune response, which reduces neuronal loss. (1) Survival of retinal ganglion cells in rats was significantly higher when optic nerve injury was preceded by an unrelated CNS (spinal cord) injury. (2) Locomotor activity of rat hindlimbs (measured in an open field using a locomotor rating scale) after contusive injury of the spinal cord (T8) was significantly better (by three to four score grades) after passive transfer of myelin basic protein (MBP)-activated splenocytes derived from spinally injured rats than in untreated injured control rats or rats similarly treated with splenocytes from naive animals or with splenocytes from spinally injured rats activated ex vivo with ovalbumin or without any ex vivo activation. (3) Neuronal survival after optic nerve injury was 40% lower in adult rats devoid of mature T cells (caused by thymectomy at birth) than in normal rats. (4) Retinal ganglion cell survival after optic nerve injury was higher (119 ± 3.7%) in transgenic mice overexpressing a T cell receptor (TcR) for MBP and lower (85 ± 1.3%) in mice overexpressing a T cell receptor for the non-self antigen ovalbumin than in matched wild types. Taken together, the results imply that CNS injury evokes a T cell-dependent neuroprotective response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The far-reaching scope of neuroinflammation after traumatic brain injury
Simon, D. W., McGeachy, M. J., Bayır, H., Clark, R. S. B., Loane, D. J., & Kochanek, P. M. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2017.13 · Cited by 1,190
Ziv, Y., Ron, N., Butovsky, O., Landa, G., Sudai, E., Greenberg, N., Cohen, H., Kipnis, J., & Schwartz, M. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1629 · Cited by 1,209
Self-citationButovsky, O., Ziv, Y., Schwartz, A., Landa, G., Talpalar, A. E., Pluchino, S., Martino, G., & Schwartz, M. (2006) · Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2005.10.006 · Cited by 923
Self-citationKipnis, J., Cohen, H., Cardon, M., Ziv, Y., & Schwartz, M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0402268101 · Cited by 510
Self-citationMicroglial phenotype: is the commitment reversible?
Schwartz, M., Butovsky, O., Brück, W., & Hanisch, U.-K. (2006) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2005.12.005 · Cited by 434
Self-citationPsychoneuroimmunology of early-life stress: the hidden wounds of childhood trauma?
Danese, A., & J Lewis, S. (2017) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2016.198 · Cited by 393
Dealing with danger in the CNS: the response of the immune system to injury
Gadani, S. P., Walsh, J. T., Lukens, J. R., & Kipnis, J. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.019 · Cited by 342
Schwartz, M., & Baruch, K. (2014) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/embj.201386609 · Cited by 349
Self-citationImmune signalling in neural development, synaptic plasticity and disease
Boulanger, L. M., & Shatz, C. J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1428 · Cited by 334
Ziv, Y., Avidan, H., Pluchino, S., Martino, G., & Schwartz, M. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0603747103 · Cited by 285
Self-citationPro-cognitive properties of T cells
Kipnis, J., Gadani, S., & Derecki, N. C. (2012) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3280 · Cited by 246
Neurological Disease as a Failure of Brain-Immune Crosstalk: The Multiple Faces of Neuroinflammation
Schwartz, M., & Deczkowska, A. (2016) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2016.08.001 · Cited by 246
Self-citationHow and why do T cells and their derived cytokines affect the injured and healthy brain?
Filiano, A. J., Gadani, S. P., & Kipnis, J. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.39 · Cited by 199
Novel glucocorticoid effects on acute inflammation in the CNS
Dinkel, K., MacPherson, A., & Sapolsky, R. M. (2003) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01604.x · Cited by 179
Cohen, H., Ziv, Y., Cardon, M., Kaplan, Z., Matar, M. A., Gidron, Y., Schwartz, M., & Kipnis, J. (2006) · Journal of Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/neu.20249 · Cited by 173
Self-citationKunis, G., Baruch, K., Miller, O., & Schwartz, M. (2015) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3644-14.2015 · Cited by 105
Self-citationProtective Autoimmunity: A Unifying Model for the Immune Network Involved in CNS Repair
Schwartz, M., & Raposo, C. (2014) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858413516799 · Cited by 86
Self-citationAutoantibody repertoires to brain tissue in autism nuclear families
Silva, S. C., Correia, C., Fesel, C., Barreto, M., Coutinho, A. M., Marques, C., Miguel, T. S., Ataide, A., Bento, C., Borges, L., et al. (2004) · Journal of Neuroimmunology · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroim.2004.03.015 · Cited by 76
Ziv, Y., & Schwartz, M. (2008) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2008.09.004 · Cited by 75
Self-citationMacrophages and microglia in central nervous system injury: are they helpful or harmful?
Schwartz, M. (2003) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1097/00004647-200304000-00001 · Cited by 207
Self-citationJean-Toussaint, R., Lin, Z., Tian, Y., Gupta, R., Pande, R., Luo, X., Hu, H., Sacan, A., & Ajit, S. K. (2021) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2021.02.005 · Cited by 36
Ereifej, E. S., Cheng, M. M.-C., Mao, G., & VandeVord, P. J. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.04.023 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Yoles, E., Hauben, E., Palgi, O., Agranov, E., Gothilf, A., Cohen, A., Kuchroo, V., Cohen, I. R., Weiner, H., & Schwartz, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2001-06-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3740-3748
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2149509854
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
