Cited by 61Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

Taking Action in the Face of Threat: Neural Synchronization Predicts Adaptive Coping

Open access
Collins, Katherine A., Mendelsohn, Avi, Cain, Christopher K., Schiller, Daniela·2014·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The ability to take action in the face of threat is highly diverse across individuals. What are the neural processes that determine individual differences in the ability to cope with danger? We hypothesized that the extent of synchronization between amygdala, striatum, and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) would predict successful active coping performance. To test this, we developed a novel computer task based on the principals of Sidman avoidance. Healthy human participants learned through trial and error to move a marker between virtual game board compartments once every 3 s to avoid mild shocks. Behaviorally, participants exhibited large individual differences. Strikingly, both amygdala-mPFC and caudate-mPFC coupling during active coping trials covaried with final active coping performance across participants. These findings indicate that synchronization between mPFC subregions, and both amygdala and caudate predicts whether individuals will achieve successful active coping performance by the end of training. Thus, successful performance of adaptive actions in the face of threat requires functional synchronization of a neural circuit consisting of mPFC, striatum, and amygdala. Malfunction in the crosstalk between these components might underlie anxiety symptoms and impair individuals' ability to actively cope under stress. This opens an array of possibilities for therapeutic targets for fear and anxiety disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2152-14.2014

Cites

41 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Talairach J, Tournoux P (1998) Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain: an approach to medical cerebral imaging. New York: Thieme.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collins, K. A., Mendelsohn, A., Cain, C. K., & Schiller, D.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2014-10-29
Volume
34
Issue
44
Pages
14733-14738
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2095764525
Cited by
61
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH097125, T32MH096678)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
active coping, threat response, neuronal synchronization, amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex, caudate nucleus, striatum, individual differences, Sidman avoidance, avoidance learning, anxiety, fear, stress response
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Avoidance Learning, Brain, Emotions, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Nerve Net, Psychomotor Performance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review