Cited by 382Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

SynGAP regulates ERK/MAPK signaling, synaptic plasticity, and learning in the complex with postsynaptic density 95 and NMDA receptor

Open access
Komiyama, Noboru H., Watabe, Ayako M., Carlisle, Holly J., Porter, Karen, Charlesworth, Paul, Monti, Jennifer, Strathdee, Douglas J. C., O'Carroll, Colin M. +4 more·2002·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

At excitatory synapses, the postsynaptic scaffolding protein postsynaptic density 95 (PSD-95) couples NMDA receptors (NMDARs) to the Ras GTPase-activating protein SynGAP. The close association of SynGAP and NMDARs suggests that SynGAP may have an important role in NMDAR-dependent activation of Ras signaling pathways, such as the MAP kinase pathway, and in synaptic plasticity. To explore this issue, we examined long-term potentiation (LTP), p42 MAPK (ERK2) signaling, and spatial learning in mice with a heterozygous null mutation of the SynGAP gene (SynGAP(-/+)). In SynGAP(-/+) mutant mice, the induction of LTP in the hippocampal CA1 region was strongly reduced in the absence of any detectable alteration in basal synaptic transmission and NMDAR-mediated synaptic currents. Although basal levels of activated ERK2 were elevated in hippocampal extracts from SynGAP(-/+) mice, NMDAR stimulation still induced a robust increase in ERK activation in slices from SynGAP(-/+) mice. Thus, although SynGAP may regulate the ERK pathway, its role in LTP most likely involves additional downstream targets. Consistent with this, the amount of potentiation induced by stimulation protocols that induce an ERK-independent form of LTP were also significantly reduced in slices from SynGAP(-/+) mice. An elevation of basal phospho-ERK2 levels and LTP deficits were also observed in SynGAP(-/+)/H-Ras(-)/- double mutants, suggesting that SynGAP may normally regulate Ras isoforms other than H-Ras. A comparison of SynGAP and PSD-95 mutants suggests that PSD-95 couples NMDARs to multiple downstream signaling pathways with very different roles in LTP and learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.22-22-09721.2002

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Grant SG (1999) Genetic dissection of a postsynaptic multiprotein com- plex controlling synaptic plasticity and learning in the mouse. In: Handbook of molecular-genetic techniques for brain and behavior research (Crusio WE, Gerlai RT, eds), pp 315-329. New York: Elsevier.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Komiyama, N. H., Watabe, A. M., Carlisle, H. J., Porter, K., Charlesworth, P., Monti, J., Strathdee, D. J. C., O'Carroll, C. M., Martin, S. J., Morris, R. G. M., O'Dell, T. J., & Grant, S. G. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2002-11-15
Volume
22
Issue
22
Pages
9721-9732
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2105350975
Cited by
382
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 16
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
SynGAP, PSD-95, NMDA receptor, ERK signaling, long-term potentiation, synaptic plasticity, spatial learning, Ras GTPase-activating protein, H-Ras, hippocampal CA1, excitatory synapses
MeSH terms
Disks Large Homolog 4 Protein, Animals, Electric Stimulation, Fetal Viability, Heterozygote, Hippocampus, Learning, Membrane Proteins, Mice, Mutant Strains, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Synapses, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Long-Term Potentiation, Gene Targeting, Patch-Clamp Techniques, ras Proteins, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1, GTPase-Activating Proteins, MAP Kinase Signaling System, Macromolecular Substances, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Mice, Guanylate Kinases, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review