Cited by 128Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

SynGAP Regulates Steady-State and Activity-Dependent Phosphorylation of Cofilin

Open access
Carlisle, Holly J., Manzerra, Pasquale, Marcora, Edoardo, Kennedy, Mary B.·2008·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

SynGAP, a prominent Ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein in the postsynaptic density, regulates the timing of spine formation and trafficking of glutamate receptors in cultured neurons. However, the molecular mechanisms by which it does this are unknown. Here, we show that synGAP is a key regulator of spine morphology in adult mice. Heterozygous deletion of synGAP was sufficient to cause an excess of mushroom spines in adult brains, indicating that synGAP is involved in steady-state regulation of actin in mature spines. Both Ras- and Rac-GTP levels were elevated in forebrains from adult synGAP+/−mice. Rac is a well known regulator of actin polymerization and spine morphology. The steady-state level of phosphorylation of cofilin was also elevated in synGAP+/−mice. Cofilin, an F-actin severing protein that is inactivated by phosphorylation, is a downstream target of a pathway regulated by Rac. We show that transient regulation of cofilin by treatment with NMDA is also disrupted in synGAP mutant neurons. Treatment of wild-type neurons with 25 μ m NMDA triggered transient dephosphorylation and activation of cofilin within 15 s. In contrast, neurons cultured from mice with a homozygous or heterozygous deletion of synGAP lacked the transient regulation by the NMDA receptor. Depression of EPSPs induced by a similar treatment of hippocampal slices with NMDA was disrupted in slices from synGAP+/−mice. Our data show that synGAP mediates a rate-limiting step in steady-state regulation of spine morphology and in transient NMDA-receptor-dependent regulation of the spine cytoskeleton.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4695-08.2008

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In adult mouse hippocampal CA1, mushroom spine density is increased in Syngap1+/− mice compared with wild-type, while thin and stubby spine densities are not increased.

    “In the hippocampal CA1 of adult mice, the density of mushroom spines, but not those of thin or stubby spines, is increased in Syngap1+/− mice compared to WT mice [51]”

    From Autism spectrum disorder: neuropathology and animal models (2017) · cites this paper as [51]

  • These results are consistent with signaling deficits previously reported in adult SynGAP mice.

    “These results are consistent with signaling deficits previously reported in adult SynGAP mice (Carlisle et al., 2008; Komiyama et al., 2002).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlisle, H. J., Manzerra, P., Marcora, E., & Kennedy, M. B.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, Mary B.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2008-12-10
Volume
28
Issue
50
Pages
13673-13683
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2095421300
Cited by
128
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  • California Institute of Technology
  • National Institutes of Health (1f32ns047894-01)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS017660, NS-17660, F32NS47894, F32 NS047894)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
SynGAP, cofilin phosphorylation, dendritic spine morphology, mushroom spines, actin cytoskeleton, Rac GTPase, Ras GTPase, NMDA receptor, activity-dependent regulation, postsynaptic density, glutamate receptor trafficking, synaptic plasticity, hippocampus
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cytoskeleton, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Organ Culture Techniques, Phosphorylation, Blotting, Western, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, N-Methylaspartate, Mice, Knockout, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Microscopy, Confocal, ras Proteins, Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, ras GTPase-Activating Proteins, rac GTP-Binding Proteins, Long-Term Synaptic Depression, Dendritic Spines, Actin Depolymerizing Factors, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review