Cited by 1,160Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Enhanced long-term potentiation and impaired learning in mice with mutant postsynaptic density-95 protein.

Migaud, Martine, Charlesworth, Paul, Dempster, Maureen, Webster, Lorna C., Watabe, Ayako M., Makhinson, Michael, He, Yong, Ramsay, Mark F. +4 more·1998·Nature

Abstract

Specific patterns of neuronal firing induce changes in synaptic strength that may contribute to learning and memory. If the postsynaptic NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors are blocked, long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) of synaptic transmission and the learning of spatial information are prevented. The NMDA receptor can bind a protein known as postsynaptic density-95 (PSD-95), which may regulate the localization of and/or signalling by the receptor. In mutant mice lacking PSD-95, the frequency function of NMDA-dependent LTP and LTD is shifted to produce strikingly enhanced LTP at different frequencies of synaptic stimulation. In keeping with neural-network models that incorporate bidirectional learning rules, this frequency shift is accompanied by severely impaired spatial learning. Synaptic NMDA-receptor currents, subunit expression, localization and synaptic morphology are all unaffected in the mutant mice. PSD-95 thus appears to be important in coupling the NMDA receptor to pathways that control bidirectional synaptic plasticity and learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/24790

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Migaud, M., Charlesworth, P., Dempster, M., Webster, L. C., Watabe, A. M., Makhinson, M., He, Y., Ramsay, M. F., Morris, R. G. M., Morrison, J. H., O'Dell, T. J., & Grant, S. G. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Grant, Seth G. N.
Venue
Nature
Published
1998-12
Volume
396
Issue
6710
Pages
433-439
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1624178692
Cited by
1,160
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 26
FWCI
17.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
PSD-95, long-term potentiation, long-term depression, NMDA receptor, synaptic plasticity, spatial learning, learning and memory
MeSH terms
Disks Large Homolog 4 Protein, Animals, Electrophysiology, Hippocampus, Learning, Learning Disabilities, Membrane Proteins, Memory, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Models, Neurological, Mutation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Synapses, Signal Transduction, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Long-Term Potentiation, Gene Targeting, Maze Learning, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Mice, Guanylate Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review