Cited by 203Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

SynGAP regulates spine formation

Open access
Vazquez, Luis E., Chen, Hong-Jung, Sokolova, Irina, Knuesel, Irene, Kennedy, Mary B.·2004·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

SynGAP is a brain-specific ras GTPase-activating protein that is an abundant component of the signaling complex associated with the NMDA-type glutamate receptor. We generated mutant mice lacking synGAP to study its physiological role. Homozygous mutant mice die in the first few days after birth; however, neurons from mutant embryos can be maintained in culture. Here, we report that spine and synapse formation are accelerated in cultured mutant neurons, and the spines of mature mutant neurons are significantly larger than those of wild type. Clusters of PSD-95 and subunits of AMPA-type and NMDA-type glutamate receptors accumulate in spines of mutant neurons by day 10 in vitro , whereas in wild-type neurons they are still mostly located in dendritic shafts. The frequency and amplitude of miniature EPSCs are larger in mutant neurons at day 10 in vitro , confirming that they have more functional synapses. At day 21 in vitro , the spines of mutant neurons remain significantly larger than those of wild type. The mutant phenotype at day 10 in vitro can be rescued by introduction of recombinant wild-type synGAP on day 9. In contrast, introduction of mutant synGAP with a mutated GAP domain or lacking the terminal domain that binds to PSD-95 does not rescue the mutant phenotype, indicating that both domains play a role in control of spine formation. Thus, the GAP activity of synGAP and its association with PSD-95 are important for normal regulation of spine and synapse formation in hippocampal neurons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3213-04.2004

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These findings are consistent with SynGAP acting as an essential repressive factor that contributes to the developmental trajectory of glutamatergic synapse maturation.

    “These findings are consistent with the role of SynGAP as an essential repressive factor that contributes to the developmental trajectory of glutamatergic synapse maturation (Kim et al., 2003; Rumbaugh et al., 2006; Vazquez et al., 2004).”
  • The role of SynGAP in regulating dendritic spine synapse function has been controversial, with some studies reporting repression and others stimulation.

    “However, the role that SynGAP plays in neurons to regulate dendritic spine synapse function has been controversial because some studies report that SynGAP is a repressor of these synapses (Kim et al., 2005; Rumbaugh et al., 2006; Vazquez et al., 2004), while others report that it stimulates them (Krapivinsky et al., 2004; McMahon et al., 2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vazquez, L. E., Chen, H.-J., Sokolova, I., Knuesel, I., & Kennedy, M. B.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, Mary B.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2004-10-06
Volume
24
Issue
40
Pages
8862-8872
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2165462647
Cited by
203
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50mh049176-10)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH49176, T32MH020069)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS028710, R01NS017660, NS-17660, NS28710)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
SynGAP, dendritic spine formation, synaptogenesis, NMDA receptor signaling, PSD-95, AMPA receptors, miniature EPSCs, hippocampal neurons, GTPase-activating protein, synapse maturation
MeSH terms
Disks Large Homolog 4 Protein, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Hippocampus, Membrane Proteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Phenotype, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Mice, Knockout, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, ras GTPase-Activating Proteins, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Dendritic Spines, Mice, Guanylate Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review