Cited by 134Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Serotonin Modulates Striatal Responses to Fairness and Retaliation in Humans

Open access
Crockett, Molly J., Apergis-Schoute, Annemieke, Herrmann, Benedikt, Lieberman, Matthew D., Müller, Ulrich, Robbins, Trevor W., Clark, Luke·2013·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Humans are willing to incur personal costs to punish others who violate social norms. Such “costly punishment” is an important force for sustaining human cooperation, but the causal neurobiological determinants of punishment decisions remain unclear. Using a combination of behavioral, pharmacological, and neuroimaging techniques, we show that manipulating the serotonin system in humans alters costly punishment decisions by modulating responses to fairness and retaliation in the striatum. Following dietary depletion of the serotonin precursor tryptophan, participants were more likely to punish those who treated them unfairly, and were slower to accept fair exchanges. Neuroimaging data revealed activations in the ventral and dorsal striatum that were associated with fairness and punishment, respectively. Depletion simultaneously reduced ventral striatal responses to fairness and increased dorsal striatal responses during punishment, an effect that predicted its influence on punishment behavior. Finally, we provide behavioral evidence that serotonin modulates specific retaliation, rather than general norm enforcement: depleted participants were more likely to punish unfair behavior directed toward themselves, but not unfair behavior directed toward others. Our findings demonstrate that serotonin modulates social value processing in the striatum, producing context-dependent effects on social behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2761-12.2013

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased dorsal striatum activity is associated with a decision to punish a partner who has acted unfairly, even when we must incur a cost to punish the partner.

    “Increased dorsal striatum activity is associated with a decision to punish a partner who has acted unfairly, even when we must incur a cost to punish the partner 96, 97.”
  • The striatum displays signals related to making a decision to punish someone for acting unfairly.

    “The striatum displays signals that are related to making a decision to punish someone for acting unfairly 96, 97, as well as related to observing a punishment meted out to someone who has acted unfairly 98.”
  • Serotonin appears to play an important role in regulating striatal responses that influence punishment decisions.

    “Indeed, decisions to punish unfairness at a personal cost are associated with impulsivity 99, and serotonin appears to play an important role in regulating striatal responses that influence punishment decisions 97.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Güth W Schmittberger R An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 1982 3 367 388
  2. Tabibnia G Satpute AB Lieberman MD The sunny side of fairness Psychological Science 2008 19 339 18399886

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crockett, M. J., Apergis-Schoute, A., Herrmann, B., Lieberman, M. D., Müller, U., Robbins, T. W., & Clark, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • European Commission (BE)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Crockett, Molly J.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-02-20
Volume
33
Issue
8
Pages
3505-3513
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2024532043
Cited by
134
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9
FWCI
45.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (092217, 093875)
  • University of Cambridge
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
serotonin, costly punishment, fairness, retaliation, striatum, ventral striatum, dorsal striatum, tryptophan depletion, cooperation, social norms, neuroeconomics
MeSH terms
Adult, Altruism, Cooperative Behavior, Corpus Striatum, Double-Blind Method, Female, Games, Experimental, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Photic Stimulation, Punishment, Serotonin, Tryptophan, Cross-Over Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review