Cited by 85Toxic Organic Pollutants ImpactNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

The Environmental Neurotoxicant PCB 95 Promotes Synaptogenesis via Ryanodine Receptor-Dependent miR132 Upregulation

Open access
Lesiak, Adam, Zhu, Mingyan, Chen, Hao, Appleyard, Suzanne M., Impey, Soren, Lein, Pamela J., Wayman, Gary A.·2014·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Non–dioxin-like (NDL) polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are widespread environmental contaminants linked to neuropsychological dysfunction in children. NDL PCBs increase spontaneous Ca 2+oscillations in neurons by stabilizing ryanodine receptor (RyR) calcium release channels in the open configuration, which results in CREB-dependent dendritic outgrowth. In this study, we address the question of whether activation of CREB by NDL PCBs also triggers dendritic spine formation. Nanomolar concentrations of PCB 95, a NDL congener with potent RyR activity, significantly increased spine density and the frequency of miniature EPSCs in primary dissociated rat hippocampal cultures coincident with upregulation of miR132. Inhibition of RyR, CREB, or miR132 as well as expression of a mutant p250GAP cDNA construct that is not suppressed by miR132 blocked PCB 95 effects on spines and miniature EPSCs. PCB 95 also induced spine formation via RyR- and miR132-dependent mechanisms in hippocampal slice cultures. These data demonstrate a novel mechanism of PCB developmental neurotoxicity whereby RyR sensitization modulates spine formation and synaptogenesis via CREB-mediated miR132 upregulation, which in turn suppresses the translation of p250GAP, a negative regulator of synaptogenesis. In light of recent evidence implicating miR132 dysregulation in Rett syndrome and schizophrenia, these findings identify NDL PCBs as potential environmental risk factors for neurodevelopmental disorders.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Nanomolar PCB 95 promotes dendritic spine formation and increases mEPSC frequency in rat hippocampal cultures and slice cultures through RyR-dependent CREB–miR132–p250GAP signaling. These findings suggest non-dioxin-like PCBs may act as environmental risk factors for neurodevelopmental disorders by mimicking activity-dependent synaptogenesis.

Key findings

  • PCB 95 (200 nM) increased total dendritic spine density by ~50% above vehicle in dissociated rat hippocampal cultures, reflecting increases in mushroom and stubby spines but not filopodia; it also significantly increased mEPSC frequency without altering amplitude or decay time.
  • PCB 95-induced synaptogenesis required RyR activity: FLA365 or siRNA against RyR1 or RyR2 blocked PCB 95-induced increases in spine density and mEPSC frequency, while not altering basal spine density.
  • PCB 95 caused a threefold increase in pre-miR132 transcript, and ACREB reduced this; anti-miR132 blocked PCB 95 effects on all spine types and mEPSC frequency. PCB 95 decreased p250GAP protein by ~60%, and mutant p250GAP that cannot be suppressed by miR132 prevented PCB 95-induced spine increases.
  • In organotypic hippocampal slice cultures, PCB 95 caused a 25% increase in total dendritic spine density in CA1 pyramidal neurons, with siRYR1, siRYR2, anti-miR132, or mutant p250GAP inhibiting the effect.

Methods

  • Primary dissociated hippocampal cultures from postnatal day 1–2 Sprague-Dawley rats and organotypic hippocampal slices from P5 rats were transfected with mRFP-β-actin or TFP plus test constructs and treated with vehicle or PCB 95 (200 nM), with or without FLA365, siRYR1/2, ACREB, shCREB, caCREB, anti-miR132, WT p250GAP, or MT p250GAP.
  • Dendritic spine density and subtype were quantified from confocal images by a blinded observer; synapsin-1 juxtaposition was assessed immunocytochemically; mEPSCs were measured by whole-cell patch clamp; pre-miR132 was measured by qPCR and p250GAP by Western blot.
  • Statistical analyses used one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test and Student’s t test, with data presented as mean ± SEM.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: PCB 95 caused a 50% increase in spine density but a threefold increase in mEPSC frequency, and the authors note there are no experimental data indicating a 1:1 correlation between spine density and mEPSC density; they suggest PCB 95 may also enhance presynaptic release because RyRs are expressed presynaptically.
  • Stated in the paper: why both RyR1 and RyR2 are required remains to be determined, and the specificity of the siRNA constructs was proved in HEK cells, with the assumption that this also holds in cultured hippocampal neurons.
  • Evident from the text: the main mechanistic evidence comes from in vitro dissociated cultures and organotypic slice cultures, not in vivo developmental exposure or behavioral outcomes; the comparison to human brain PCB 95 levels is correlational.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2884-13.2014

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

33 of 47 cited sources checked · 18 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    CREB-miR132-p250GAP signaling also mediates activity-dependent synaptogenesis in cultured hippocampal neurons.

    “CREB-miR132-p250GAP signaling also mediates activity-dependent synaptogenesis in cultured hippocampal neurons (Impey et al., 2010), suggesting that NDL PCBs interfere with neurodevelopment by mimicking and/or enhancing the effects of neuronal activity, a critical cue in refining patterns of synaptic connectivity in the developing brain (Katz and Shatz, 1996;Yuste and Bonhoeffer, 2001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Impey et al., 2010 source
  • Findingcitation

    Expression of cDNA encoding WT p250GAP does not prevent PCB 95 effects on spine density.

    “Expression of cDNA encoding WT p250GAP does not prevent PCB 95 effects on spine density, presumably because PCB 95induced miR132 expression knocks down p250GAP levels (Wayman et al., 2008;Impey et al., 2010) (ANOVA: F (5,137) , total F ϭ 20.16, p Ͻ 0.0001, mushroom F ϭ 14.74, p Ͻ 0.0001, stubby F ϭ 16.12, p Ͻ 0.0001, filopodia F ϭ 0.2675, p ϭ 0.9303, Tukey's post hoc; Fig. 4G).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wayman et al., 2008 source

      The Results (page unavailable) show that miR132 reduces WT p250GAP expression and that WT p250GAP, unlike a miR132-insensitive mutant, did not block CREB-dependent dendritic growth. These findings support the proposed mechanism, but the paper does not test PCB 95 or its effects on spine density. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Impey et al., 2010 source

      In Results, ‘miR132 regulates spine formation by down-regulating p250GAP’ (page unavailable), wild-type p250GAP did not inhibit spine formation, whereas a miR132-insensitive mutant did. This supports the proposed miR132–p250GAP mechanism, but the source does not test PCB 95 or establish that wild-type p250GAP fails to prevent PCB 95’s effects. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    Transfection with anti-miR132 blocks PCB 95 effects on all spine types.

    “Transfection with a 2ЈO-methyl RNA oligonucleotide that targets miR132 (anti-miR132) (Impey et al., 2010) blocks PCB 95 effects on all spine types (ANOVA: F (3,88) , total F ϭ 11.24, p Ͻ 0.0001, mushroom F ϭ 9.282, p Ͻ 0.0001, stubby F ϭ 8.253, p Ͻ 0.0001, filopodia F ϭ 0.1983, p ϭ 0.8973, Tukey's post hoc; Fig. 4B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Impey et al., 2010 source
  • Findingcitation

    Expression of cDNA encoding MT p250GAP that lacks a functional miR132 regulator element and cannot be suppressed by miR132 prevents PCB 95-induced increases in dendritic spine density.

    “However, expression of cDNA encoding MT P250GAP that lacks a functional miR132 regulator element within the 3Ј region, and therefore cannot be suppressed by miR132 (Wayman et al., 2008), prevents PCB 95induced increases in dendritic spine density (Fig. 4G).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wayman et al., 2008 source
  • Premisecitation

    Developmental exposure to PCB 95 or Aroclor 1254 (a commercial mixture of PCBs enriched for NDL PCBs) impairs cognitive behavior in weanling rats at doses that enhance neuronal connectivity in vivo.

    “Consistent with this hypothesis, developmental exposure to PCB 95 or Aroclor 1254, a commercial mixture of PCBs enriched for NDL PCBs, impairs cognitive behavior in weanling rats at doses that enhance neuronal connectivity in vivo (Schantz et al., 1997;Kenet et al., 2007;Yang et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Schantz et al., 1997 source
    • cites Kenet et al., 2007 source

      The PCB95 Administration section describes developmental PCB95 exposure in rats, and the Results and Discussion report altered auditory-cortex organization and plasticity in their pups. The paper does not report impaired cognitive behavior or enhanced neuronal connectivity at those doses; it discusses Aroclor 1254 only in connection with previous hearing-impairment studies. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Yang et al., 2009 source

      The Results sections on spatial learning and dendritic plasticity report that developmental Aroclor 1254 exposure at 1 mg/kg/day impaired learning and memory in weanling rats while increasing dendritic length in untrained animals. The paper does not report cognitive impairment after developmental PCB 95 exposure: its PCB 95 dendritic-growth experiment used cultured neurons, not rats. No page numbers are available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. 17
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Decreased translation of p250GAP releases inhibition on Rac1, resulting in increased synaptogenesis.

    “Because p250GAP inhibits Rac1 activity (Moon et al., 2003;Nakazawa et al., 2003;Taniguchi et al., 2003;Zhao et al., 2003;Nasu-Nishimura et al., 2006), the decreased translation of p250GAP effectively releases inhibition on Rac1, resulting in increased synaptogenesis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Moon et al., 2003 source

      The In Vitro and in Cells section reports that p200RhoGAP reduces Rac1-GTP, supporting the proposed inhibitory activity. But our copy identifies the protein as p200RhoGAP, not p250GAP, and does not establish that the two names refer to the same protein. The citation is attached to the Rac1-inhibition premise; the later translation and synaptogenesis statement is the citing authors’ inference. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Nakazawa et al., 2003 source

      The Results (page unavailable) directly contradict the cited premise that p250GAP inhibits Rac1: p250GAP reduced active RhoA and Cdc42 but had little effect on active Rac1. The subsequent claim about decreased translation and synaptogenesis is the citing authors’ inference, not the part this citation is attached to. (LLM, conf=0.94)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Taniguchi et al., 2003 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Nanomolar concentrations of PCB 95 stabilize ryanodine receptors in the open configuration, increasing Ca2+ release from intracellular stores.

    “Nanomolar concentrations of PCB 95 stabilize ryanodine receptors (RyRs) in the open configuration, increasing Ca 2ϩ release from intracellular stores (Pessah et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pessah et al., 2010 source

      Section 2.2 says PCB 95 stabilizes RyR1 in its fully open state, and section 2.3 describes PCB 95–induced calcium release from intracellular ER stores. The copy does not establish that these effects occur at nanomolar PCB 95 concentrations; its concentration statement reports enhanced RyR activity at ≤1 μM. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    CREB activation mediates activity-induced dendritic spine formation in cultured hippocampal neurons via upregulation of miR132, which suppresses the translation of p250GAP, a negative regulator of synaptogenesis.

    “CREB activation also mediates activity-induced dendritic spine formation in cultured hippocampal neurons via upregulation of miR132, which suppresses the translation of p250GAP, a negative regulator of synaptogenesis (Impey et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Impey et al., 2010 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Because RyRs are functionally coupled to NMDA receptors, the findings suggest that RyRs are required for not only PCB-induced synaptogenesis, but also activity-dependent synaptogenesis, expanding the role for RyRs in neuronal plasticity.

    “Because RyRs are functionally coupled to NMDA receptors (Berridge, 2006;Pessah et al., 2010), our findings suggest that RyRs are required for not only PCB-induced synaptogenesis, but also activity-dependent synaptogenesis, expanding the role for RyRs in neuronal plasticity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Berridge, 2006 source
    • cites Pessah et al., 2010 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Dysfunction of MeCP2 has been implicated in significant cognitive impairment.

    “Dysfunction of MeCP2 has been implicated in significant cognitive impairment, and both mutations and duplications of the gene have been associated with Rett syndrome and ASDs (LaSalle and Yasui, 2009;Percy, 2011;Cukier et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites LaSalle and Yasui, 2009 source
    • cites Percy, 2011 source
    • cites Cukier et al., 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Both mutations and duplications of the MeCP2 gene have been associated with Rett syndrome and ASDs.

    “Dysfunction of MeCP2 has been implicated in significant cognitive impairment, and both mutations and duplications of the gene have been associated with Rett syndrome and ASDs (LaSalle and Yasui, 2009;Percy, 2011;Cukier et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites LaSalle and Yasui, 2009 source

      The Rett syndrome section identifies MECP2 mutations as a cause of Rett syndrome, and the autism section reports MECP2 mutations or expression defects in autism-spectrum disorders (page numbers unavailable). The paper discusses MECP2 duplication in mice and cites a study associating duplication of the MECP2 region with severe intellectual disability in males, but our copy does not link that duplication to Rett syndrome or ASDs. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Percy, 2011 source

      The ‘Role of MECP2’ section reports that MECP2 mutations are common in classic Rett syndrome. The ‘Continuum of MECP2 Associated Phenotypes’ section describes a MECP2 duplication disorder but says its phenotype is distinct from Rett syndrome. The ‘Autism and RETT Syndrome: Molecular Convergence’ section links altered MECP2 expression to autism; it does not establish that both MECP2 mutations and duplications are associated with ASDs. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Cukier et al., 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Disruption of MeCP2 function results in significant dendritic and synaptic dysregulation.

    “MeCP2 is a transcriptional repressor, and disruption of its function results in significant dendritic and synaptic dysregulation (Zhou et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhou et al., 2006 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    NDL PCBs potentiate RyR activity to activate CREB, which then upregulates miR132, a translational repressor that suppresses p250GAP expression.

    “Our data support a model (Fig. 6) in which NDL PCBs potentiate RyR activity to activate CREB, which then upregulates miR132, a translational repressor that suppresses p250GAP expression (Wayman et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wayman et al., 2008 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    MeCP2 knock-out animals have significantly perturbed synthesis and release of BDNF.

    “MeCP2 knock-out animals have significantly perturbed synthesis and release of BDNF, a neurotrophic factor that stimulates dendritic outgrowth and synaptogenesis (Jin et al., 2003;Wang et al., 2006;Rex et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Jin et al., 2003 source

      The Results section reports that BDNF promotes dendritic growth in cultured neocortical interneurons, supporting the sentence’s description of BDNF. But the claim under review is specifically about perturbed BDNF synthesis and release in MeCP2 knock-out animals. No passage in our copy addresses MeCP2 knock-out animals or that perturbation (searched: MeCP2 knock-out, BDNF synthesis and release). (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Wang et al., 2006 source
    • cites Rex et al., 2007 source

      The Introduction discusses BDNF release during theta-pattern stimulation, and the section on theta-stimulation-induced actin polymerization examines BDNF in adult hippocampal slices. Neither addresses MeCP2 knock-out animals or whether their BDNF synthesis and release are perturbed (searched: MeCP2 knock-out, BDNF synthesis and release). (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    MeCP2 is a transcriptional repressor.

    “MeCP2 is a transcriptional repressor, and disruption of its function results in significant dendritic and synaptic dysregulation (Zhou et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhou et al., 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    BDNF is a neurotrophic factor that stimulates dendritic outgrowth and synaptogenesis.

    “MeCP2 knock-out animals have significantly perturbed synthesis and release of BDNF, a neurotrophic factor that stimulates dendritic outgrowth and synaptogenesis (Jin et al., 2003;Wang et al., 2006;Rex et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Jin et al., 2003 source
    • cites Wang et al., 2006 source

      The Discussion (page not provided) describes BDNF-dependent regulation of neural development and activity-dependent refinement of synaptic connections. That supports a broad role in neural and synaptic development, but our copy does not state that BDNF stimulates dendritic outgrowth or synaptogenesis specifically. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Rex et al., 2007 source

      The Introduction (page not provided) describes neurotrophins as stimulating process outgrowth during development and modifying dendritic cytoskeletons; the paper identifies BDNF as a neurotrophin. The Discussion (page not provided) mentions synaptogenesis but does not say that BDNF stimulates it. The paper therefore supports the outgrowth portion, not the synaptogenesis portion. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Expression of miR132 is dysregulated in schizophrenia.

    “More recently, expression of miR132 has been shown to be dysregulated in schizophrenia (Kim et al., 2010;Miller et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kim et al., 2010 source
    • cites Miller et al., 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    miR132 interacts with fragile X mental retardation protein to regulate synapse formation.

    “miR132 has also been shown to interact with fragile X mental retardation protein to regulate synapse formation (Edbauer et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Edbauer et al., 2010 source

      The Introduction and Discussion identify miR-132 as FMRP-associated, and the Discussion reports that FMRP knockdown prevented miR-132’s effect on dendritic spine morphology. The Results also report changes in spine density and synaptic activity, but the paper does not establish that miR-132 interacts with FMRP to regulate synapse formation specifically. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    FLA365 treatment or expression of siRyR1 or siRyR2 inhibits PCB 95-induced increases in mEPSC frequency but has no effect on mEPSCs in control cultures.

    “Consistent with these findings, FLA365 treatment or expression of siRyR1 or siRyR2 inhibits PCB 95induced increases in mEPSC frequency but has no effect on mEPSCs in control cultures (ANOVA: FLA series F (3,51) ; Freq F ϭ 15.92, p Ͻ 0.0001, Amp F ϭ 8.722, p Ͻ 0.0001, DT F ϭ 0.5313, p ϭ 0.6629; ANOVA: siRYR series F (5,87) ; Freq F ϭ 9.138, p Ͻ 0.001,”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The specificity of the siRNA constructs for RyR1 and RyR2 demonstrated in HEK cells also holds true in cultured hippocampal neurons.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Expression of siRNA specific for either RyR1 or RyR2 suppresses PCB 95 effects on dendritic spine density but does not alter basal dendritic spine density.

    “RyR1 and RyR2, but not RyR3, are expressed in this hippocampal cell culture model (Wayman et al., 2012b), and expression of siRNA specific for either RyR1 or RyR2 (Wayman et al., 2012b) suppresses PCB 95 effects on dendritic spine density but does not alter basal dendritic spine density (Fig. 2A).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wayman et al., 2012b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: The specificity of the siRNA constructs for RyR1 and RyR2 demonstrated in HEK cells also holds true in cultured hippocampal neurons.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Transfection with constitutively active CREB phenocopies the effects of PCB 95 on mature mushroom-shaped spines but did not increase immature stubby spine density.

    “Conversely, transfection with constitutively active (ca) CREB (Cardinaux et al., 2000) phenocopies the effects of PCB 95 on mature mushroomshaped spines but did not increase immature stubby spine density (Fig. 3B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cardinaux et al., 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Exposure to PCB 95 at 200 nM causes a 25% increase in total dendritic spine density in CA1 pyramidal neurons in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures, reflecting significant increases in both mushroom and stubby spine density.

    “Exposure to PCB 95 at 200 nM causes a 25% increase in total dendritic spine density in CA1 pyramidal neurons, which reflects significant increases in both mushroom and stubby spine density (Fig. 5).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Neither WT p250GAP nor MT p250GAP expression had any significant effect on filopodia density.

    “Neither WT p250GAP nor MT p250GAP expression had any significant effect on filopodia density (Fig. 4G) or changed the percentage of mRFP ϩ spines in close physical apposition to synapsin-1 immunoreactivity (data not shown).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Neither WT p250GAP nor MT p250GAP expression changed the percentage of mRFP+ spines in close physical apposition to synapsin-1 immunoreactivity.

    “Neither WT p250GAP nor MT p250GAP expression had any significant effect on filopodia density (Fig. 4G) or changed the percentage of mRFP ϩ spines in close physical apposition to synapsin-1 immunoreactivity (data not shown).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Expression of anti-miR132 prevents PCB 95-induced increases in mEPSC frequency but did not change mEPSC decay time.

    “Expression of anti-miR132 also prevented PCB 95induced increases in mEPSC frequency but did not change mEPSC decay time (ANOVA: F (3,49) , Freq F ϭ 17.84, p Ͻ 0.0001, DT F ϭ 1.301, p ϭ 0.285, Tukey's post hoc; Fig. 4C,E).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In cultured hippocampal neurons, PCB 95 sensitization of RyRs increases Ca2+ oscillations and triggers sequential activation of CaM kinase, Mek/ERK, CREB, and Wnt to enhance dendritic growth.

    “In cultured hippocampal neurons, PCB 95 sensitization of RyRs increases Ca 2ϩ oscillations, and this triggers sequential activation of CaM kinase, Mek/ERK, CREB, and Wnt to enhance dendritic growth (Wayman et al., 2012a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wayman et al., 2012a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    All constructs were tested on multiple cultures, with each normalized to an average of their own controls.

    “(all constructs were tested on multiple cultures, with each normalized to an average of their own controls).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Spines were manually counted and classified by an individual blinded to experimental condition.

    “Spines were manually counted and classified by an individual blinded to experimental condition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Each experiment was repeated at least twice (three times or more for most conditions) using cultures prepared from independent dissections.

    “Each experiment was repeated at least twice (three times or more for most conditions) using cultures prepared from independent dissections.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    PCB 95 upregulates miR132 expression in cultured hippocampal neurons via CREB-dependent mechanisms, and this is critical for the effect of PCB 95 on synaptogenesis.

    “Specifically, we demonstrate that PCB 95 upregulates miR132 expression in cultured hippocampal neurons via CREB-dependent mechanisms, and this is critical for the effect of PCB 95 on synaptogenesis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These data demonstrate a novel mechanism of PCB developmental neurotoxicity whereby RyR sensitization modulates spine formation and synaptogenesis via CREB-mediated miR132 upregulation, which in turn suppresses the translation of p250GAP, a negative regulator of synaptogenesis.

    “These data demonstrate a novel mechanism of PCB developmental neurotoxicity whereby RyR sensitization modulates spine formation and synaptogenesis via CREB-mediated miR132 upregulation, which in turn suppresses the translation of p250GAP, a negative regulator of synaptogenesis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ triggers phosphorylation of CREB, stimulating CREB-dependent transcription.

    “Increased cytoplasmic Ca 2ϩ triggers phosphorylation of CREB, stimulating CREB-dependent transcription.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
27 of 27
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The specificity of the siRNA constructs for RyR1 and RyR2 demonstrated in HEK cells also holds true in cultured hippocampal neurons.

    “The specificity of these siRNA constructs was proved in HEK cells (Wayman et al., 2012b), so we assume this also holds true in cultured hippocampal neurons.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Spine density is often positively correlated with cognitive capacity.

    “Spine density is often positively correlated with cognitive capacity; however, histological studies of brains from patients diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders (Hutsler and Zhang, 2010) or fragile X syndrome (Irwin et al., 2001) have revealed significantly increased spine densities in neurons relative to neurotypical controls.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    miR132 dysregulation is implicated in Rett syndrome and schizophrenia.

    “In light of recent evidence implicating miR132 dysregulation in Rett syndrome and schizophrenia, these findings identify NDL PCBs as potential environmental risk factors for neurodevelopmental disorders.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Hyperconnectivity may be as disruptive to normal cognitive function as hypoconnectivity.

    “that hyperconnectivity may be as disruptive to normal cognitive function as hypoconnectivity.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Figure 5A is cited for quantification but caption identifies it as images

    Minor

    The results cite Figure 5A for the measured effects of siRYR1 and siRYR2 on spine density. The caption assigns representative photomicrographs to panel A and quantification to panels B-D.

  • miR132 is described as both a transcriptional and translational repressor

    Minor

    The Figure 6 caption calls miR132 a transcriptional repressor, whereas the discussion calls it a translational repressor. Both passages describe its suppression of p250GAP in the same proposed mechanism.

  • Figure 1 electrophysiology sample counts conflict with ANOVA degrees of freedom

    Minor

    For two groups, F(1,58) implies 60 observations, but the Figure 1 caption gives 38 and 32 neurons, totaling 70. The reported group counts and test degrees of freedom therefore do not describe the same sample size.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lesiak, A., Zhu, M., Chen, H., Appleyard, S. M., Impey, S., Lein, P. J., & Wayman, G. A.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2014-01-15
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
717-725
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1974761966
Cited by
85
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
PCB 95, non-dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls, ryanodine receptor, calcium release channel, CREB, dendritic spine formation, synaptogenesis, developmental neurotoxicity
MeSH terms
Animals, Cells, Cultured, Environmental Pollutants, Female, Hippocampus, Male, Organ Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-12.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-12.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review