Cited by 80Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Neural Correlates of Reinforcement Learning and Social Preferences in Competitive Bidding

Open access
van den Bos, Wouter, Talwar, Arjun, McClure, Samuel M.·2013·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

In competitive social environments, people often deviate from what rational choice theory prescribes, resulting in losses or suboptimal monetary gains. We investigate how competition affects learning and decision-making in a common value auction task. During the experiment, groups of five human participants were simultaneously scanned using MRI while playing the auction task. We first demonstrate that bidding is well characterized by reinforcement learning with biased reward representations dependent on social preferences. Indicative of reinforcement learning, we found that estimated trial-by-trial prediction errors correlated with activity in the striatum and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Additionally, we found that individual differences in social preferences were related to activity in the temporal-parietal junction and anterior insula. Connectivity analyses suggest that monetary and social value signals are integrated in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and striatum. Based on these results, we argue for a novel mechanistic account for the integration of reinforcement history and social preferences in competitive decision-making.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3095-12.2013

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The social competition inherent in an auction drives overbidding and is related to striatal value computations for winning and losing an auction.

    “That is, the social competition inherent in an auction drives overbidding and is related to striatal value computations for winning and losing an auction 88, 89.”
  • Ventral striatum responses are involved in decisions where we are in direct competition with someone else, as in bidding for an item in an auction.

    “Ventral striatum responses are also involved in decisions where we are in direct competition with someone else, as in the case of bidding for an item in an auction.”
  • Ventral striatum and medial prefrontal cortex signals encode information learned about strategic actions of competitors.

    “Additionally, ventral striatum and medial prefrontal cortex signals encode information learned about strategic actions of competitors 72, 88, 90.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. van den Bos et al. • Competition, Learning, and Social Preferences J. Neurosci., January 30, 2013 • 33(5):2137-2146 • 2145

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van den Bos, W., Talwar, A., & McClure, S. M.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-01-30
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
2137-2146
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2094413769
Cited by
80
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (446-11-012)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
tendering, common value auctions, reinforcement learning, social preferences, prediction error, striatum, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, anterior insula, temporoparietal junction, individual differences, monetary value, neural correlates of decision making
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Competitive Behavior, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Reinforcement, Psychology, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review